Complexity
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2005
- Messages
- 9,242
Leumas described proof by contradiction, which is an example of a logical proof. Logic being a branch of mathematics. So your point seems largely irrelevant.
It may seem so, perhaps, but I don't think that it is irrelevant.
That proof by contradiction is valid itself requires assumptions (axioms) that are not assumed in every mathematical system. Proof is a concept that must be used with great care, and that care is seldom taken in philosophical discussions and never (in my experience) in more casual discussions.
It should not be bandied about, and it does not belong in the sciences.
Last edited: