• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Chick Tracts

Cool!
Founded even earlier I see, November 18878.
We might as well talk about football in a Jack Chick thread.



Aha! Your distracting talk about the past has failed to disguise your true nature: you are time-travelers from the future!

It's a conspiracy of future-dwellers meddling with our contemporary religious thinkings, and stuff!

And now that I have unmasked you… er… well, uh… :o
 
Aha! Your distracting talk about the past has failed to disguise your true nature: you are time-travelers from the future!

It's a conspiracy of future-dwellers meddling with our contemporary religious thinkings, and stuff!

And now that I have unmasked you… er… well, uh… :o
I think Celtic was probably founded by time travellers from the past, come to meddle with religious thinking in Glasgow. Rangers even more so!
 
I don't remember anybody in the catholic church I was raised in say that god had to obey Mary, or Satan had to obey Mary either.
Here's a really weird site, that is clearly arguing the opposite.
The following work confirms many of the Bayside revelations. The book essentially exposes the remarks and gestures made by a possessed woman in Switzerland during 1975‑1978. Speaking through the possessed woman, the demons were forced to tell the truth by Our Lady under the Solemn Church Exorcism, which was witnessed by the following priests who have all expressed their conviction of the authenticity of the revelations made by the demons upon the order of the Blessed Virgin.
http://www.tldm.org/news4/warningsfrombeyond.2of3.htm
But probably they didn't read that stuff in the Catholic Church you were raised in. Or I hope not, anyway.

Once the Blessed Virgin has had a chat with the demons, well you can believe every word that comes out of Hell. They're a bit "pre-conciliar" down there, by the way. Don't think the Church should introduce innovations. I can't imagine what they think of Pope Francis!
 
asydhouse said:
Cool!
Founded even earlier I see, November 18878.
We might as well talk about football in a Jack Chick thread.



Aha! Your distracting talk about the past has failed to disguise your true nature: you are time-travelers from the future!

It's a conspiracy of future-dwellers meddling with our contemporary religious thinkings, and stuff!

And now that I have unmasked you… er… well, uh… :o

...you're not a Masked Shrike.






[Birders' joke....sorry....I'll get my coat....and my binoculars.. ]
 
This one has a good amount of Fang, with Fang briefly prevailing against his old rival, The Cat Whose Name I Don't Know (TCWNIDK). Fang has TCWNIDK up a tree, but he takes advantage of a brief lapse of concentration on Fang's part, and near the end is seen chasing Fang out of the panel, where yet another cat-on-dog rape will certainly take place. Oh, Fang, you scatterbrained scamp, will you ever win?

The problem is that the Fang plot is recycled directly from Cathy, but leaves out Fang's famous "crapping on the lawn" and "sleeping standing up" scenes that made Cathy an all-time classic of Fangdom. I give Mary's Kids a five out of ten.

I guess there was some stuff about Jesus and Mary or something too. I don't really pay attention to those parts.
 
Last edited:
I do remember comments about how Mary has "held back the wrath of God" on many occasions. So he doesn't have to obey her, but he does listen to her, and she can talk him down when he goes on a rampage, basically.

That's interesting - I've always thought of the Old Testament God as the abusive alcoholic father, and Jesus as his shy, under-achieving son. Now you've described Mary as the co-dependent wife who can settle him down from his drunken rampages.

What a dysfunctional family!
 
That's interesting - I've always thought of the Old Testament God as the abusive alcoholic father, and Jesus as his shy, under-achieving son. Now you've described Mary as the co-dependent wife who can settle him down from his drunken rampages.

What a dysfunctional family!

Hey, theologists are just going to talk about what they know
 
Like the fact that the flood was the result of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost going on a monstrous beer bash?

And the heavenly urinal was all stopped up by the enormous cigarette butts carelessly discarded by the nephilim.
 
You just know he gets up to some weird stuff, like pits dug in his basement, puts the lotion on its skin, fat girl skin suits weird. I suspect this a public battle with private demons.
 
Jack Chick has always had a beef with Catholicism, viewing it as a false version of Christianity full of made-up doctrines intended to control the members.
For example, the anti-Communion tract "The Death Cookie".
 
Jack Chick has always had a beef with Catholicism, viewing it as a false version of Christianity full of made-up doctrines intended to control the members.
For example, the anti-Communion tract "The Death Cookie".
That is a quite astounding cartoon. According to Chick the letters IHS on the host stand for "Isis, Horus and Seb, the Gods of Egypt". The RCC hasn't taken this stuff lying down of course. For its response see http://www.catholic.com/documents/the-nightmare-world-of-jack-t-chick
 
Doesn't this dispute date back to Pope Leo XIII's Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae on the heresy of Americanism in 1899?

Even today, you can find references to this. For example:
How to Address Priests and Religious: Titles and Signs of Respect

For the same reason, it is inconvenient for a Catholic to call a Protestant preacher “reverend,” because this is to indirectly confer legitimacy to his heretical confession. It is much better to call a Lutheran Mr. Jones instead of reverend Jones, or use the title Doctor or Professor, if it is applicable. In writing, it is sometimes necessary to refer to a Protestant as bishop, but the title should be lower case, e.g. bishop Philip Robinson, or Protestant bishop Robinson, as a sign of differentiation from the Catholic Bishop.

The same general rule regarding Protestants – that is, to avoid the religious title in direct address – would apply to the hierarchy in other heretical or schismatic confessions. If a title is used in writing, it should be lower case, e.g. rabbi Jacob Levinsky, or for an “orthodox” bishop, bishop Michael Baldwin, etc.
 
Doesn't this dispute date back to Pope Leo XIII's Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae on the heresy of Americanism in 1899?

Even today, you can find references to this. For example:
How to Address Priests and Religious: Titles and Signs of Respect

For the same reason, it is inconvenient for a Catholic to call a Protestant preacher “reverend,” because this is to indirectly confer legitimacy to his heretical confession.
This was very much Leo XIII's view, and not only as regards Americanism. See his On the Nullity of Anglican Orders 1896. http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13curae.htm.

The Catholic defence against Chick's absurd conspiracy theories, referred to in my last post, while it seeks Protestant support against Chick, is unyielding on the invalidity of Protestant ritual.
The Eucharist is worshiped, but since it is Jesus himself it does not amount to worshiping "another" Jesus. Many other Christians, including Lutherans, believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist (although they do not in fact have the Real Presence in their churches) and recognize that Jesus is to be worshiped wherever he is.
 
That is a quite astounding cartoon. According to Chick the letters IHS on the host stand for "Isis, Horus and Seb, the Gods of Egypt". The RCC hasn't taken this stuff lying down of course. For its response see http://www.catholic.com/documents/the-nightmare-world-of-jack-t-chick

I always wondered what it actually stood for, aside from that. From Wikipedia: "IHS" or "IHC", denoting the first three letters of the Greek name of Jesus, IHΣΟΥΣ, iota-eta-sigma, or ΙΗΣ.

Where the sigma changed form to the lunate sigma C (lunate like a moon slice) in medieval Greek, and S sigma finally.

I wonder if the vernacular thought it stood for Jesus (something) Christ, hence Jesus H. Christ.
 

Back
Top Bottom