Charlie Rangel: Bring back the draft

The draft would not demonstrate to young people that everyone must do his or her fair share. It is more likely to convince them that the demand for sacrifice is made mainly on those too poor to avoid it. The volunteer force in Iraq has been a truer cross section of America than the force created under the last draft, which ended in 1973, before the end of the Vietnam War. The wealthy and well-connected could get deferments then or assignments to safe alternatives, and many did. While there are plenty of underprivileged in the current force, at least they are there by their own choosing.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/21/opinion/21tue1.html


I guess Rangel didn’t stop to consider the glaring example of the above demonstrated by George H.W. Bush where his own son was concerned.
 
Just remember. You're not just saying something bad about W, you're slandering everyone who served in the National Guard during the Vietnam war.

But that's OK. Ideological collateral damage.
 
Darth Rotor said:
Pre Herpies. Pre AIDS. Pre Cell Phones

Not such a bad idea.
Pre-personal computers, pre-internet, pre-CD's, pre-DVD's, and pre-VHS too. But I don't think the 60's was pre-herpies.

Come on folks, herpes. It's moments like this that I realize we on this board often collectively appear to be a bunch of red necks debating what we saw on the Discovery Channel and read on wikipedia.:covereyes
 
No question, Dave. but....

The spelling of herpes is not really a measure of redneck values but support for tradition, convention, officialdom, and conservative interpretation is.
 
The spelling of herpes is not really a measure of redneck values but support for tradition, convention, officialdom, and conservative interpretation is.
Totally my bad. I spelled it that way, didn't double check. It looked funny, but I was too lazy to make sure.

I owe all you better.

Two minute minor. :(

DR
 
The Rangel-draft seems to be the democratic symbolic legislation version of the flag amendment. Something that won't pass that gets brought up for symbolic/provocative purposes.
 
Bravo to all the Democrats who voted against all the Republicans, only because that’s Bush’s party. Have fun in the military (yes, they will draft Democrats too), and see the world. Remember, Republicans=stupid, Democrats=smart, that makes this a smart idea.

Bush and company led us to war on falsified or incorrect evidence. They have not apologized. They deserve to be out.
 
The Rangel-draft seems to be the democratic symbolic legislation version of the flag amendment. Something that won't pass that gets brought up for symbolic/provocative purposes.

It's really not even that. The flag amendment gets within a few votes of actually passing when the Republicans are in control, albeit most are doing it for political reasons rather than a deep felt sense of protecting the flag.

This is the political equivalent of voting in rape. Virtually none of the Democrats want to be associated with it from what I can tell. It might be Rangel's version of the flag amendment, but it is not the Democrat's version.

Don't confuse a single Democrat being an idiot with the whole Democratic party (at least not in this case :p).
 
The Rangel-draft seems to be the democratic symbolic legislation version of the flag amendment. Something that won't pass that gets brought up for symbolic/provocative purposes.
Except there are people who actually support the Republican symbolic legislation. What the Hell is the point of Rangel's legislation? Let's alienate everyone?
 
But I know there's no will to win. I'll be pay for the troops is bellow the poverty line for a family of four. Hell, I'll bet it's still as low as $12,500 a year!

A married E1, with less than four months, gets 1300 a month in base pay plus another (on average) 1000 a month in BAH. Roughly 27,500 annually.
 

Back
Top Bottom