AkuManiMani
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2008
- Messages
- 3,089
Oh gosh, I'm already pulling enough aggro as it is. Don't really need to tell them my whole life story, nor is it necessary for me to convince them of the validity or amazingness my accounts. As I already said, I've other reasons for mentioning what I have and the details, as given so far, are more than sufficient.
Key word hilited.
You seem to have convinced yourself of the validity or amazingness your accounts.
You seem highly motivated to divest me of my alleged sense of validity and amazingness regarding these accounts
This is EXACTLY the essence of what I've been getting at. What one considers to be "supernatural" or "mundane" are all relative to what they consider to be explicable within their own conceptual model of reality. To an individual living 200 years ago, the vast majority of the technology we use today would appear "magical". Likewise, the picture of reality science will provide a couple centuries from now will probably seem extraordinary to the average scientist of today. Such violations do not invalidate their experiences of the world but merely highlight the limitations of their understanding.
Reality is vaster and stranger than any single conception of it can ever contain.There are bound to be occurrences and anomalies that completely violate any given individual's personal model of reality. It is not prudent to automatically re-interpret those anomalies to suit one's preconceptions, just as it is not a good idea to assume that they cannot be understood; in either case, one closes off their mind to potentially learning something new. Our current body of scientific understandings is not the be-all-end-all of reality; it will forever be tentative and incomplete. One would be wise to keep this in mind, especially when assessing accounts of apparently anomalous phenomena, or one's own extraordinary experiences. There are always things beyond one's epistemic horizons, no matter how knowledgeable or smart they may be.
I haven't noticed these occurrences and anomalies that completely violate my personal model of reality.
Bully for you!
So personal experience is the only arbiter of reality?
No, but it is the only connection one can have to it.