AkuManiMani
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2008
- Messages
- 3,089
What are you talking about?Oh, I see. So you can give an allegedly accurate account of the experiences of a stranger from across the internet but you can't accurately recall your own?![]()
I never gave an account of your experiences.
What are you talking about?
I never gave an account of your experiences.
I can recall my own experiences, but I fully expect my recollections to be inexact.
Wrong again. You haven't presented us with anything to test or investigate. You have presented us with a list of what seem to my unqualified eyes to be pretty obvious seizure symptoms; certainly if it happens again I'd suggest you see a doctor.
Now, if you have some actual evidence you wish to discuss, feel free.
Oh, and I'll note that once again you entirely failed to address the points I made.
Hardly an answer.
Nope. I never gave an account of your expereince, not in that post nor anywhere else.Really? The forum history shows differently.
You'd be far better off making allowances for your own. Let me see you attempt that before I burden you further.BTW, what were the contents of your auditory hallucinations, Pixy? Don't worry, I'll make allowances for your piss poor, confabulated memory.
No, it's perfectly true.This is misleading at best, dishonest at worst.
Sure. So? Do you consider that implausible?You can hedge all you want, but you heavily implied Aku had had a seizure.
Reduced to pointing out your basic errors in comprehension and logic? My dear chap, we've been doing that since the discussion began.Rocketdodger was also caught putting words in peoples' mouths (or out and out lying). Is this what the computationalist position has been reduced to?
Any time you wish to address any of the points being discussed, you are of course free to do so.Gud lurd... If I had realized you were this comically dense, PixyMisa, I'd have stoped taking you seriously years ago
Any time you wish to address any of the points being discussed, you are of course free to do so.

This is misleading at best, dishonest at worst.
PixyMisa said:No, it's perfectly true.
You can hedge all you want, but you heavily implied Aku had had a seizure.
PixyMisa said:Sure. So? Do you consider that implausible?
PixyMisa said:I never gave an account of your experiences.
Rocketdodger was also caught putting words in peoples' mouths (or out and out lying). Is this what the computationalist position has been reduced to?
PixyMisa said:Reduced to pointing out your basic errors in comprehension and logic? My dear chap, we've been doing that since the discussion began.
It's a possible explanation. I never said what AkuManiMani experienced; I suggested a reason why.No, it's not. You denied giving an account of Aku's claim.
In fact, you heavily implied he suffered from a seizure. You were quite explicit in your reasoning. That qualifies as "giving an account".
Do you grasp the fact that your own memory is unreliable, that your memories are constructs?Oh, and I'm still curious about the content of those hallucinations, PixyMisa. While your memory may be shoddy and your integrity seriously questionable, I'd still like to hear you out![]()
Any time you feel like attempting to address any of the points being discussed, you are of course free to do so.[nothing]
Do you grasp the fact that your own memory is unreliable, that your memories are constructs?Oh, and I'm still curious about the content of those hallucinations, PixyMisa. While your memory may be shoddy and your integrity seriously questionable, I'd still like to hear you out![]()
Until you understand your own fallability - and stop with the pathetic ad homs - I see no reason to trouble you further with reality.
Any time you feel like attempting to address any of the points being discussed, you are of course free to do so.

PixyMisa said:It's a possible explanation. I never said what AkuManiMani experienced; I suggested a reason why.No, it's not. You denied giving an account of Aku's claim.
In fact, you heavily implied he suffered from a seizure. You were quite explicit in your reasoning. That qualifies as "giving an account".
So, no. Not that it matters. If you really want to call an explanation an "account", feel free.
Me and everyone familiar with the meaning of the word.
Definition of ACCOUNT
1archaic : reckoning, computation
2a : a record of debit and credit entries to cover transactions involving a particular item or a particular person or concern b : a statement of transactions during a fiscal period and the resulting balance
3a : a statement explaining one's conduct b : a statement or exposition of reasons, causes, or motives <no satisfactory account of these phenomena> c : a reason for an action : basis <on that account I must refuse>
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/account
Rather than admit this trivial fact you once again dig in your heels and pretend to be infallible.
Yawn.
I'm afraid this really only shows that you are using differing connotations of the same word.
Pixy actually did not recast what Aku experienced. He provided an alternative explanation for it. I don't happen to agree with either explanation -- Aku's or Pixy's -- but it is not the case that Pixy recast what Aku actually experienced, which was his point.