Challenge to William Rodriguez

Hmm what a surprise. I just nicely sent you an email agreeing to do your show without knowing you were challenging me in this forum. Very surprised you went this route. So my offer know is off. For the record, like I said on the e-mail, I happen to like Mr Roberts and remeber meeting him on Ground Zero. Very cordial. also after checking in my past list of media contacts, I found that I sent you an email long time ago when you had Les Jamieson on your show because you lied on the air saying that I did not go to the NIST because all I wanted was money. Wrong approach buddy.



to Ronald Wieck <ronniejames@att.net>
date Apr 29, 2007 4:23 PM
subject Re: Hardfire Appearance
mailed-by gmail.com

Hi, thanks for the invitation. I will love to appear and since my actual agenda is full, I will find a date in the coming weeks to help you. I like Mr. Mark Roberts very much and agree with him in many aspects. It will be a humble honor to have a dialogue with him. what number my organizer should call you at?
William Rodriguez

William how many explosions did you hear during the initial impact?
You claim one before,... and then what?
 
Now you definitely won't have that interview. :rolleyes:


Rodriguez understands that his bluff was called. He thought he was being clever by pretending to accept my invitation to tell his story and then ducking out on a bizarre pretext. He made a mistake by kissing up to Mark. All I had to do to expose Willie as a complete fraud was offer to drop out of the picture. Now he's reduced to silence and looks ridiculous.
 
Anyways, it's no big loss. It's not like his testimony had any importance, as far as conspiracy theories go. He just heard a loud noise.
 
"I like Mr. Mark Roberts very much and agree with him in many aspects. It will be a humble honor to have a dialogue with him. what number my organizer should call you at?"

William Rodriguez


Gee, Willie, I think you're a phony. Why not make me eat my words by setting up an interview with Mark?

I'm beginning to think the same thing.

Nobody discounts that he was heroic on 9-11. His story about having to return early from a speaking engagement in Europe when his wife miscarried rings true and my heart goes out to anyone who suffers such a loss.

If he wants to make a buck speaking about his experiences on that fatefull day, that's fine with me. But, if he wants to do so then he has to accept the baggage that brings.

He can't avoid the hard questions. He can't make lame excuses as to why he would back out of an appearance. He can't continue to use his heroic deeds on that day as a shield to why he shouldn't defend some of his statements and observations to those who have questions.
 
show me the money!
Pardalis- you are right on the last 2 threads.
Kissing up to Marks ass? I do not think he will like that,
and yes I do respect him.
 
show me the money!
Pardalis- you are right on the last 2 threads.
Kissing up to Marks ass? I do not think he will like that,
and yes I do respect him.

Then please have a debate with him on Hardfire, sans Ron, and we can leave all this forum bickering to rest, which, to be honest, is not doing anyone any good.

The place for discussion and truth is only outside the internet system, one that the truthers will guard at any cost, but one that Ron gave the chance to break out of. Whatever your issue you have with him, you cannot deny his initial cordial invitation.

I think I speak for everyone here William, when we want to see you beyond the confines of youtube, and speaking in a rational, ordered enviroment. Or, that said,not listening to tedious sods like me with stupid names.
 
Does this mean that you're going to show, or only show if they're willing to pay for the appearance?
 
Why post of you arent going to address the issue?
dodge and weave, dodge and weave
 
Willie's central deception is that I somehow insulted him. He understands perfectly well that my original invitation contained no hint of an insult. His posturing makes him look silly.
 
When I say show me the money, It was to answer the post previous to mine. Meaning, where is the money I have supposedly made. Also where are the money from supposed interviews I made all over the world?
Why post of you arent going to address the issue?
dodge and weave, dodge and weave

You are right, not answers needed.
 
Okay then William. Direct question. If your travel and accomadation were paid for, would you be willing to appear on Hardfire for a 25 minute interview, hosted by Mark Roberts, where you both discussing your claims about 9/11?

No dodging, no weaving, just yes, or no.
 
He is preparing a Q & A. I still want to see what that contains.
 
He is preparing a Q & A. I still want to see what that contains.

What does that mean? He lobs himself some softballs?

Isn't that convenient.

"Yes, I'll do an interview. Here are the only questions you may ask me. Please ask them exactly in that order and exactly as written."
 
I have no idea what he means by that, but I'm expecting some answers. And about real issues, not some paychecks. But I'm not expecting too much until I see something.
 
Perhaps I am just being curmudgeonly this morning, but unless WR saw an explosive device, there is little he can contribute to the events of that day aside from anecdotal evidence of what he experienced. His actions that day are not relevant to a discussion of the facts. His actions since that day are not relevant to a discussion of the facts.
 

Back
Top Bottom