Care to Comment

[Tony Szamboti]

If you examine this part of your newly edited word salad, you will find that the same object is both decelerating at 1g, and have zero acceleration, both at the same time.

You have to remember that a static load is the weight of the building when stationary, it does not disappear just because it is moving. So when something is moving downwards and decelerating the load will be the usual 1g plus the g of the deceleration.

Decelerating a drop at 0.2g would be mass times (1g+0.2g) for a total of 1.2 times static load.

Let's describe it in terms of the velocity change. To get a load from an impact of a freefalling object which is equal to 1.2 times the static load you need to have a deceleration of 32.2 ft/sec/sec x 1.2 = 38.64 ft/sec/sec, in other words a 1.2g deceleration.

That is equal to the static load plus an amplification of 0.2.

It seems there is confusion because I am speaking of deceleration occuring relative to full gravitational acceleration. The static load is being decelerated by 1g to begin with relative to a full gravitational acceleration state.

 

[Profanz]

I love when truthers try to get technical. You'll only find a meaningless term like "incendiary assistance" when a truther troll steps out of his comformt zone.

I love when debunkers have no real reply at all. Except maybe a cartoon. It shows where they are coming from.

 

[funk de fino]

I love when debunkers have no real reply at all. Except maybe a cartoon. It shows where they are coming from.

By incendiary assistance you meant fire. Right?

 

[Profanz]

By incendiary assistance you meant fire. Right?

Here is an example, just an example.

http://www.anarchistnews.org/?q=node/11160

You could just type incendiary into google too.

"incendiary devices". Is this a new subject for you? Do you not know the difference between explosives, incendiary devices, or incendiary/bombs?

 

[funk de fino]

Here is an example, just an example.

http://www.anarchistnews.org/?q=nod...ries than you or any of your previous guises.

 

[Toke]

Does Tony disagree with the graphs from his own data?

I think so, but it is hard to keep track.

 

[Profanz]

Incendiary assistance to start a fire. That would be the planes then eh? When did you join the debunkers?

Planes and jet fuel wouldn't burn long enough Funk. Not even according to your bedtime story.

As I was in the military I know far more about explosives and incendiaries than you or any of your previous guises.

Then why did you pretend to not know the difference? Hmm?

 

[Toke]

It seems there is confusion because I am speaking of deceleration occuring relative to full gravitational acceleration. The static load is being decelerated by 1g to begin with relative to a full gravitational acceleration state.

Well, you obviously managed to confuse yourself, and be off by 1g.

 

[Toke]

Planes and jet fuel wouldn't burn long enough Funk. Not even according to your bedtime story.

So the fires in the towers were not started by the planes?

And the columns were cut by ninja squirrels with light sabres?

 

[Bell]

So the fires in the towers were not started by the planes?

I guess Profanz is a no-planer.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

So the fires in the towers were not started by the planes?

And the columns were cut by ninja squirrels with light sabres?

They all happen to fall under the idiotic view that the office spaces these planes went into were entirely devoid of other flammables.

 

[Toke]

They all happen to fall under the idiotic view that the office spaces these planes went into were entirely devoid of other flammables.

I guess one have to be reality impaired to be a truther.

 

[Profanz]

So the fires in the towers were not started by the planes?

And the columns were cut by ninja squirrels with light sabres?

Why don't you tell me what you think happened? Because right now you don't have a very believable narrative. 9/11 compares to a ninja a squirrel for you? That's what I'm saying.

 

[Toke]

Why don't you tell me what you think happened? Because right now you don't have a very believable narrative. 9/11 compares to a ninja a squirrel for you? That's what I'm saying.

Sure, a plane hit the building, damage building and start a fire, the fire heats the steel until it gets soft, and building collapse.

See, easy enough, your turn.

 

[Baylor]

You could just type incendiary into google too.

No term of "incendiary assistance" came up. http://www.google.com/search?q=incendiary+assistance&hl=en&rlz=1W1ADFA_en&start=10&sa=N

It was nice of you to dress up words in order to kowtow to Tony--one of the few truthers with technical training.

 

[Oystein]

No term of "incendiary assistance" came up. http://www.google.com/search?q=incendiary+assistance&hl=en&rlz=1W1ADFA_en&start=10&sa=N
...

This even gets funny if you put quote marks arounbd the search term:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="incendiary+assistance"

First hit is THIS thread
Second hit is some financial analogy
Third hit is "In August the incendiary assistance of Jupiter will be added as an ignition device alongside Uranus at that time. Exactly how we are supposed to cooperate ...
mysticmarguerite.com/WebDocs/.../November09Rant.html - Cached"

 

[funk de fino]

Planes and jet fuel wouldn't burn long enough Funk. Not even according to your bedtime story.

Nver said they would. Incendiary assistance means to help eh? Those fires helped start the fires which did bring down the towers.

Go debunker!

Then why did you pretend to not know the difference? Hmm?

You lie.

 

[Dave Rogers]

I try not to call anyone a liar unless it is very warranted. In this instance here you are lying.

Look at post #272, then repeat your assertion that there is no negative slope in the velocity curve. Then I'll be able to call you a liar.

Dave

 

[Dave Rogers]

Does Tony disagree with the graphs from his own data?

I don't think he understands them well enough to disagree with them. He certainly doesn't understand his own analysis of the data.

Dave

 

[TruthersLie]

I love when truthers try to get technical. You'll only find a meaningless term like "incendiary assistance" when a truther troll steps out of his comformt zone.

Unloved.

That is so mean.

He means they tied up several hundred thousands of these to the building

didn't you get the invitation?