The comedian, a proud progressive, acknowledges that progressives are the ones largely pushing cancel culture, but believes people can change.
Can you believe the audacity of this.....female presenting person who's steeped in white privilege.....to actually suggest the people change and should be forgiven for past transgressions ?
SARAH SILVERMAN WARNS AGAINST CANCEL CULTURE
Somebody who's previously appeared in blackface.
We've seen with the whole Teen Vogue lesson that this is impossible. That which has been said cannot be unsaid and must follow the offender to the grave and possibly beyond.
Why do you think she is being audacious and why call her “female” rather than person, is her sex important to your point?
Audacious for going against lessons learned form examples posted on this thread, Teen Vogue being only one of those and female presenting person to display my extensive grasp of cutting progressive ideology and terminology.
Can't have people thinking I'm some sort of right winger now can I ?
I have no idea what you are trying to communicate.
1) That Sarah Silverman isn't really a progressive due to deviation from demonstrated progressive orthodoxy.
2) Sarah Silverman is female presenting and to describe he as such is to avoid pitfalls like "adult human female" which is, as any serious progressive would know, can be construed as transphobic.
3) Practically begging for a refutation and evidence that Silverman's characterization of cancel culture being largely pushed by progressives when we all know it's the right wing media that's doing that. I'd do my own research but my internet connection is currently down.
4)I'm virtue signalling.
Since the rest of your points are baggage from elsewhere, the right wing media is being criticized for largely pushing the “dangerous new thing the left is doing” narrative while gladly participating in it themselves when it’s target is someone or some thing they don’t like. In fact, recent speeches and communications from prominent right wing figures specifically call for cancellation because they feel it’s effective and they don’t do it enough.
Besides, she is calling for forgiveness to people who have repented for their sins against orthodox progression, which is much different than denouncing cancel culture. In that vein, plenty of people have been cancelled and still deserve it.
The phrase "Cancel Culture" is designed to be tough and fearful. "There's a Culture that they (you know who they are) have where they crush...kill...Cancel those unlike them!"
Great for a moral panic, but in the end, all you see standard left wingers doing is saying "WWait, why isn't Trump 'cancelling" sports leagues, sugary drinks, and the like? And how are we "canceling" things we never even said anything about, much less organized against?" And the answer is, as I said, it's not a coherently defined term.
ETA: there's no *massive* disagreement that, say, sometimes people are fired unfairly for a social media post, some people who get attacked on Youtube for screaming and howling in public are really just having a mental illness episode and need help - although where these lines are drawn, exactly, is debatable. But adding "culture" to what moves it away from any individual boycott, and into the horrifying idea that there's some unspecified, but clearly *implied* mob that just goes around seeking revenge for petty offenses, something like a volcano god or dragon that can only be appeased through sacrifices or slaughtered - an ascribing of ill will to what are, rally, events that are effectively unrelated when you examine them.
I thought "cancel culture" was about people getting fired for saying things unrelated to their job.
An writer about the outdoors losing popularity because he reveals himself to be anti-gun is pretty directly related to his job performance.
Next time I have a negative job performance review I'm going to accuse my boss of "cancelling" me.
Spewing smoke to cover reality.I have no idea what you are trying to communicate.
You are either grossly ignorant of the circumstances or in denial.
Under what definition of "cancel culture" is it *not* cancel culture for a public figure to lose support for saying something offensive?Would it be "cancel culture" if a writer for a mostly vegetarian or vegan audience lost popular support if that writer advocated occasionally eating meat?
Have you provided a viable alternative?Nope. I pointed out why I felt yours was flawed. You didn’t really care to address that so you can continue to use it if you choose
Under what definition of "cancel culture" is it *not* cancel culture for a public figure to lose support for saying something offensive?
I don't think a phenomenon needs to be new to be noteworthy. "Rape culture" is a relatively new coinage, but it certainly isn't a new thing.I fail to see how a public figure alienating their audience and suffering a loss of popularity as any novel or noteworthy phenomena that merits a new term nor hand wringing.
Is there a working definition of "cancel culture" which incorporates this distinction?In the example of the gun writer coming out as a Fudd, that's not even a personal scandal a la Bill Cosby or Weinstein, but something that speaks directly to his expertise and his position as a respected voice on the subject matter.
I don't think a phenomenon needs to be new to be noteworthy. "Rape culture" is a relatively new coinage, but it certainly isn't a new thing.
As to hand-wringing, I suppose that depends on whether hunting culture and assault rifle culture are indeed heavily overlapping. Last I checked they were not, but that was decades ago. I'd defer to the expert here, but he's the one who got cancelled.Is there a working definition of "cancel culture" which incorporates this distinction?
If only there were some working definition which has already been repeatedly linked. Ah well.As such, I don't have a definition beyond that.