Shalamar
Dark Lord of the JREF
So, does Missouri's new law to ban books quality as "cancel culture"?
No. Only ‘libs’ can cancel.
So, does Missouri's new law to ban books quality as "cancel culture"?
The segment only lasts a few minutes, and I've already told you where it begins. Have a listen, or don't.How's about you present these "meaningful arguments" yourself, rather than expecting everybody else to go slog through a 40 minute podcast to find them?
The segment only lasts a few minutes, and I've already told you where it begins. Have a listen, or don't.![]()
So it seems.No. Only ‘libs’ can cancel.
Plenty of content for those who care to listen.Ah, so content free spam promotion it was!
Plenty of content for those who care to listen.
"He who has ears, let him hear."
Plenty of content for those who care to listen.
"He who has ears, let him hear."
Once again, a "segment" is not an entire "podcast" or "show," it is but a portion thereof.If you can't summarize the 40 minute podcast, or even describe the arguments made, you give no one a reason to actually watch/listen to the latest thing you're just spamming links to.
Once again, a "segment" is not an entire "podcast" or "show," it is but a portion thereof.
The "cancel court" segments typically last between 10 and 15 minutes, and I'm going to keep posting them here whether you like it or not, since they are definitely on topic.
On that note, here's another episode of Cancel Court, this time about "whether former New York Times Op-Ed page editor James Bennet was canceled or not..."
https://twitter.com/D4M10N/status/1593394392928231426
Once again, a "segment" is not an entire "podcast" or "show," it is but a portion thereof.
The "cancel court" segments typically last between 10 and 15 minutes, and I'm going to keep posting them here whether you like it or not, since they are definitely on topic.
On that note, here's another episode of Cancel Court, this time about "whether former New York Times Op-Ed page editor James Bennet was canceled or not..."
https://twitter.com/D4M10N/status/1593394392928231426
If you think "cancelled" requires utter destitution and perpetual unemployment, you aren't using the term correctly.
Then all your establishing is that "cancelling" is no big deal. Lives and careers aren't destroyed. People just get new jobs and life goes on. It seems fairly mundane actually, and not very useful in the service of convincing people "cancel culture" is this terrible scourge that threatens us all.
I don't recall claiming anything about a "terrible scourge" but possibly I'm misremembering. I would say that sometimes cancellations go too far and have rather undesirable results, such as when Gimlet lost their flagship podcast following the public shaming of two of its main figures, or when Slate lost its daily news podcast, or when Gelato Mio was ratings bombed by angry skeptics.People just get new jobs and life goes on. It seems fairly mundane actually, and not very useful in the service of convincing people "cancel culture" is this terrible scourge that threatens us all.
I listen to them. You might try it, sometime; the link I posted earlier should take you to exactly the starting point.How do you know they're on topic?
I don't recall claiming anything about a "terrible scourge" but possibly I'm misremembering. I would say that sometimes cancellations go too far and have rather undesirable results, such as when Gimlet lost their flagship podcast following the public shaming of two of its main figures, or when Slate lost its daily news podcast, or when Gelato Mio was ratings bombed by angry skeptics.
What’s the criteria for determining how and when “cancellations” go to far?
And who gets to make that determination?
And studiously avoiding certain matters.*** checking in to see what is happening in this thread ***
Same old same old. People still bitching about "cancel culture"; something that doesn't really exist except in the minds of social justice warriors and other salty types.
Nothing new to see here then...