And my take on the OP, too, even though it comes very late.
[soapbox]Mel Gibson's case illustrates why the smartest choice is not to drink alcohol at all.
With a sample size of one? Hardly. He's an example that you shouldn't drink too much perhaps, or that you shouldn't be a bad actor in silly religious movies...
As a society, we have a
drinking problem.
"Speak for yourself" is often good advice. I personally know a handful of people from your society that do not contribute to what you seem to perceive as a problem.
There's evidence that drinking alcohol is
harmful to ourself and those around us.
If done in moderation? The link you gave doesn't suggest it - but I am sure I could find similar statistics for white bread. If many people drink then *of course* you will have many drinking criminals, too. No proof of causation there, though.
Alcohol does something to your brain.
Just like milk, sugar, chocolate and oxygen.
People suffer tremendously as a direct consequence of drinking alcohol or being around people who drink alcohol. Every alcoholic starts with just one drink. Every drunken-driving death starts with just one drink.
I sense a slippery slope.
Nobody sips that first drink thinking, "I'm going to ruin my life," or "I'm going to kill someone tonight." We all tend to think that just one drink is no big deal. But "just one drink" has a way of turning into another. And another.
And then you had a grand total of an entire three drinks. Whoopie. Of course, most people after 3 drinks, or even 6 or 9 or 12, will *still* not go out and kill someone, steer a car into a tree or get married in Vegas.
OK, maybe you're strong enough and responsible enough to stop at just one drink. Maybe you've never, ever had too much to drink, or done something stupid or hurtful after drinking alcohol. You think you're a responsible drinker.
Indeed. At least, I am as responsible when drinking as I am with other things. I am not perfect either way, but I don't expect myself to be. Oh: I've hurt more people when I was sober, so I guess I ought to be drinking more, yes?
But the social reality in most cases is that when you drink, you encourage others to drink.
Yes, and when I eat I encourage others to have a bite, too. I give books to other people, too. Frequently.
When you drink, you teach your children to drink.
<rant>You better believe that I would teach my children to drink. I have seen many people who didn't know how to drink, and it wasn't always pretty. Funny thing is, these people tend to be underaged Americans set on the loose in Europe where a beer is no big deal. they certainly didn't know how to drink...</rant>
When you drink, through your example you invite others to engage in an activity that, for some of them, will become harmful. Even deadly.
Cry me a river.
I do the same driving my car. Or jogging, or swimming. Sometimes people die. It's called "live". Some people even die in their sleep, so I guess children should under no circumstances be encouraged to sleep, right?
If you drink regularly in moderation, ask yourself, can you stop drinking for a month? If so, then do it, as an experiment. If you can't stop for a month, you have a problem. If you can stop for a month, why not do yourself and everyone else a favor and stop for another month? And then another?
How exactly would I be doing anyone - including me - a favour?
I *like* beer, or chicken wings in a red-wine-and-herbs-sauce, as well as the slivovic sauce.
Prohibition isn't the answer. Individual choice is. There's no such think as drinking responsibly.
[/soapbox]
How is it a choice, if there are no real options acceptable to you?
And how on earth do you explain all the people that do drink, but somehow fail to kill others, do not beat their wifes and children and end up being productive members of their society?
And what insane twist of logic should have me being responsible for the actions of others? I drink. I can handle it. If you can't then you shouldn't be drinking regardless of what I do.