arthwollipot
Limerick Purist Pronouns: He/Him
The treaty was convened specifically for the mitigation of climate effects.Art: there is no evidence that any Tuvaluans who win the lottery are climate refugees.
The treaty was convened specifically for the mitigation of climate effects.Art: there is no evidence that any Tuvaluans who win the lottery are climate refugees.
And North Korea is explicitly a democratic people's republic.The treaty was convened specifically for the mitigation of climate effects.
Are you saying that the United States isn't United?And North Korea is explicitly a democratic people's republic.
"Just read what's on the tin" doesn't work, once we've seen what's actually inside the tin.
No.Are you saying that the United States isn't United?
It's not the "label on the tin" it's the content and substance of the treaty and its explicit purpose.Trausti has made a case that Australia's policy towards Tuvalu is one of economic migration, despite what it supposedly says on the tin. Appealing to the label on the tin doesn't address any of his claims about what's actually inside.
My, Dude. How many Tuvaluans were driven out of their homes and washed up in rickety boat on Australia's shores?The treaty was convened specifically for the mitigation of climate effects.
And yet a climate effects mitigation purpose isn't served by an economic migration lottery that excludes children from consideration.It's not the "label on the tin" it's the content and substance of the treaty and its explicit purpose.
If they had named it the "Anti-Martian Protection Visa" would you believe the actual purpose was to protect them from little green men?It's not the "label on the tin" it's the content and substance of the treaty and its explicit purpose.
Hopefully, none. With any luck, they will all have a safe and dignified avenue for legal migration before that becomes necessary.My, Dude. How many Tuvaluans were driven out of their homes and washed up in rickety boat on Australia's shores?
Why not? You clearly don't understand this at all.And yet a climate effects mitigation purpose isn't served by an economic migration lottery that excludes children from consideration.
Hopefully, none.
Why is luck a factor? What about your vaunted treaty?Hopefully, none. With any luck, they will all have a safe and dignified avenue for legal migration before that becomes necessary.
So explain it. Tuvalu is drowning, but only earners are allowed to enter a lottery to emigrate to the land of plenty.Why not? You clearly don't understand this at all.
Analogy fail.And North Korea is explicitly a democratic people's republic.
The title 'democratic people's republic' describes what's in the tin pretty well, once you understand it. What you are doing is the equivalent of arguing that Chicken of the Sea canned Tuna doesn't describe what's in the tin because it isn't chicken.People's republic... is mainly associated with soviet republics, communist states that self-designate as people's democratic states, sovereign states with a democratic-republican constitution that usually mentions socialism... Following World War II, developments in Marxist–Leninist theory led to the appearance of people's democracy, a concept which potentially allowed for a route to socialism and dictatorship... Countries which had reached this intermediate stage were called people's republics.
My argument is that Arth is relying on the same disingenuous labeling strategy that communist states and tuna industrialists rely on.Analogy fail.
People's republic
The title 'democratic people's republic' describes what's in the tin pretty well, once you understand it. What you are doing is the equivalent of arguing that Chicken of the Sea canned Tuna doesn't describe what's in the tin because it isn't chicken.
Whereas you are relying, once again, on overly-pedantic hyperliteral interpretations of common idioms.My argument is that Arth is relying on the same disingenuous labeling strategy that communist states and tuna industrialists rely on.
Why is luck a factor? What about your vaunted treaty?
When your island is only a few meters above sea levels, you don’t have much choice. And in case people think a few centimetre sea rise is no big deal, think storm surges.Most climate refugees are, for now, migrating inernally, ie in their own countries.
I don't think some people understand just how low-lying some of these Pacific islands are.When your island is only a few meters above sea levels, you don’t have much choice. And in case people think a few centimetre sea rise is no big deal, think storm surges.
Long before storm surges, there's the more important and permanent problem of contamination of the water tables by sea water and the salinisation of the soil, both of which make the low lying islands and coastal regions uninhabitable …When your island is only a few meters above sea levels, you don’t have much choice. And in case people think a few centimetre sea rise is no big deal, think storm surges.
Yes, agreed. Thanks.Long before storm surges, there's the more important and permanent problem of contamination of the water tables by sea water and the salinisation of the soil, both of which make the low lying islands and coastal regions uninhabitable …
Absolutely, but for countries such as Bangladesh, the climate refugees are still able to stay. That will not be true for long, and the issue with fresh water Flo mentions will probably be the tippning point. By then, the climate refugee crisis will be noticeable (even to the staunchest deniers), and excacerbated by the destruction of ecosystems, and extreme weather, which will make crop growing impossible.When your island is only a few meters above sea levels, you don’t have much choice. And in case people think a few centimetre sea rise is no big deal, think storm surges.