Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

roscoe_the_first said:
... Wait 'till I mention the fact all over the internet that the chicken yellow bellied JREF shills have been blown away yet again and want to crawl under a rock.
Click to expand...

I was impressed. roscoe has the same evidence to support CIT as CE does.

Bird2.jpg
 
Last edited:
How come some people just blatantly ignores the search function and the opportunity to realize that these exact "groundbreaking ,earthshattering points that will expose the government as a fraud now and forever etc etc" have all been discussed AD NAUSEUM on this very forum by these very people that they are now trying to entice into a new debate?

Is it because you think its boring to read 5 years worths of old threads or is it because you want your own "15 minutes of attention"?

Furthermore these things you propose arent really up for debate anymore they ever were.
Its like proposing something like "the earth is really flat" and then proceed to present a bunch of videos of an earth appearing to be..flat(im being generous ,your case isnt even that solid,its more like"the moon is made of cheese").

Ask yourself this,draw your own conclusions why you want to continue this debate before you waste anymore of "people that are smarter then you"'s time..

just my 2 cents..
 
Several more posts have been moved to AAH. Come on, folks, be civil, stay on-topic, and abide by the terms of your Membership Agreement.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Howie Felterbush said:
I have no dog in this fight, and I'm not trying to disparage what Redtail's saying, because he (or she) is totally correct.

That being said, when people do the things listed above they get called "loons" or worse.

Not saying they're right or wrong, but that is what happens, isn't it? What's a person to do, really?
Click to expand...

You're right if (like truthers) one doesn't actually have said evidence or the evidence is flawed.

However if one does actually have solid evidence of a great injustice... Well, I have the right to vote, my wife has the right to vote, hell we have the right to be married in the first place (and much more) because people did what I mentioned.

Granted it was many people, and it took time, but the truthers claim numbers in (at least) the thousands.

Point is, truthers seems more concerned with showing up debunkers on web forums than doing anything that would effect the real world.
 
Redtail said:
You're right if (like truthers) one doesn't actually have said evidence or the evidence is flawed.

However if one does actually have solid evidence of a great injustice... Well, I have the right to vote, my wife has the right to vote, hell we have the right to be married in the first place (and much more) because people did what I mentioned.

Granted it was many people, and it took time, but the truthers claim numbers in (at least) the thousands.

Point is, truthers seems more concerned with showing up debunkers on web forums than doing anything that would effect the real world.
Click to expand...

Good point.

I guess if they had anything substantial, they'd be hollering at the newspapers instead of hollering here.
 
Howie Felterbush said:
I guess if they had anything substantial, they'd be hollering at the newspapers instead of hollering here.
Click to expand...

at this point, I'm not sure that would do any good.

do you know what happens when you bring insane and stupid "evidence" to the media, and then when they think your evidence is crap, you call them evil NWO agents out to destroy mankind?

they start to ignore you. Truthers could know where Jimmy Hoffa is buried and most reporters wouldn't give a ****.

not because they don't care about such a huge news story, but because it comes from known liars and charlatans and jerks.
 
Funny, on June 2, 2010, I wrote the following

"Heh, you forgot to add their socks.

You know, The Buffet Slayer and Shakey have been very quiet.

They haven't had a stooge pimping their stuff here in months. I assume they've given up.

Can't say I'm surprised, Da Twoof is getting down to the unemployed and unemployable hard core losers."

And the next day, we get a new thread about their garbage video that came out a year ago. Things that make you go, hmmmm.
 
16.5 said:
Really, then you've seen the raw video then?

And lying about what? Even the Buffet Slayer admits that Lloyde was mistaken, he could not have been on the bridge where he insisted he was. So you think an eighty year old man who was, by the time that hidden video was shot, confused about the events of the day was also "indirectly" admitting to foreknowldge of mass murder?

Really. Well, good for you. hey it is on You Tube, it has got to be true.
Click to expand...

For me it seems, that the cab-driver is the only eyewitness, the official conspiracy theory (OVT) has for the more southerly flight path. This flight path would be consistent with the damage on the light poles and inside the pentagon. When you have more eyewitness, show it. And even that "official" eyewitness, Mister Lloyd England, is now claiming the opposite, that the plane flew more northerly, than the OVT claims! He indicates, that someting was staged. That is exciting.

The OVT did a big mistake on 911 in damaging the light poles, because the plane flew more northerly as planned.
 
carlitos said:
A quick search found this, but there are some others.



one more:
Click to expand...

how dare you in misrepresenting the accounts!

Many eyewitnesses did their case very clear by marking the more northerly flight path in a map.
 
After watching the video - the case, that the plane was not hitting the pentagon, is not as strong as the point with the light poles and the lying cab-driver.

... before I make a indefinite call, I wait for eyewitnesses for the more southerly flight path put up by supporters of the OVT.
 
bio said:
come on, there had to be any witnesses for the official flight path! IF not, somethings stinks.
Click to expand...

No such rule actually exists. Your insistence that it does is irrelevant.

It's been 9 years. Human memories have faded and become blurred by time. But physical evidence always trumps eyewitness testimony.

Is there any physical evidence for the Ranke/Marquis flightpath?
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
No such rule actually exists. Your insistence that it does is irrelevant.

It's been 9 years. Human memories have faded and become blurred by time. But physical evidence always trumps eyewitness testimony.

Is there any physical evidence for the Ranke/Marquis flightpath?
Click to expand...

oh my god, you have not a single eyewitness! :shocked:
 
bio said:
oh my god, you have not a single eyewitness!
Click to expand...

Using that standard then neither do you. The northern path witnesses are just as likely to be wrong as the southern path witnesses for the same reasons, time fades memories. That leaves the actual physical evidence to determine the facts, and that evidence does not agree with the northern flight path.

Thanks for conceding the point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom