HumanityBlues
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,741
Read the post you quoted more carefully.
Damn, thanks! Ya, totally out of context.
Read the post you quoted more carefully.
I make that comment fairly often. Single payer Health Insurance would be a BOON to small and new businesses. Those things that conservatives claim to support.
Small businesses would be better able to compete for employees, and new business owners wouldn't have to worry about their own health care. Everyone is simply covered.
But it would gut the profits of the insurance industry and I understand they're pretty heavy lobbyists not to mention political contributors.![]()
Not necessarily. Insurance companies LOVE Medicare. It doesn't quite cover everything and has created a huge market for supplemental plans. Single payer would likely be similar.
Obama's (and Clinton's before him) mistake was not getting the insurers to help write the Obamacare bill. It would look very different, of course, but the R's would have had a harder time opposing it.
I'm a Democrat, but frankly this kind of game of gotcha by taking a quote out of context and twisting its meaning just makes me roll my eyes. What he's talking about is freaking people who have part-time jobs but want to work full time!
"(That) means we have to be a lot more productive. Workforce participation has to rise from its all-time modern lows. It means that people need to work longer hours and through their productivity gain more income for their families. That's the only way we are going to get out of this rut that we're in," Bush had said.
Except that many times people who want to work more aren't allowed to because their employer often does not want to give them benefits if they work full-time hours or does not want to or can't afford to pay them over-time.
Even if he is, he's still out of touch. I don't know if you work full-time but it sucks. Full-time work means that you spend forty hours (or more) a week at the workplace which translates into eight to twelve hours at work for most of the week, usually at undesirable hours.
You never get any time for friends, family, or other loved ones because you spend half the day at work, the other half sleeping it off. All to slave away to do likely menial work for just enough money to get by.
So get another job. It isn't illegal to have more than one job. Work as much as you need/want to.
Oh of course. Instead of paying people a living wage, let's just work them to death. Is that the country you want?
I'm playing the saddest song I know (d minor, naturally) on my imaginary violin.
xjx said:What's more important? Playtime or supporting your family?
xjx said:We all do what we have to so we can provide what we need/want. If we don't, we don't get what we need/want. It's pretty simple....
Oh of course. Instead of paying people a living wage, let's just work them to death. Is that the country you want?
We work more than 60 hours a week.
Yes, as long as he has a comfortable life, who cares?
Out of curiosity how many hours per day is that?
Usually 12 to 15.
I used to work 12 hour shifts, I could scarcely stand it. I'm not a father nor a husband and it beats me how anyone can work full-time and have any kind of a family life.
Maybe I need to delegate my time better, hahah.
So get another job. It isn't illegal to have more than one job. Work as much as you need/want to.
I've heard it put this way. "You'll never get wealthy working 9-5. Commute in the dark."Usually 12 to 15. When we owned the clinic, there are days I would go in at 7am and come home after 2am. Now that I don't worry about the clinic, There are some days I get away with 10 hours.
I don't need to do that, but if I want to provide my family all the things I want to provide them, I do it gladly.
We don't necessarily like working as much as we do but it serves our goals: have no debt, get our kids set up and semi-retire at 55.