Random said:
Why should Barbour and Nagin get the bulk of the blame? Look, the whole point of putting FEMA into the Department of Homeland Security was that there would be a single organization that could respond when really bad stuff happened. Something really bad happened, and FEMA and the DHS screwed up royally. Did the governor and mayor make mistakes? Yes. But you can’t get around the fact that FEMA and DHS didn’t do their jobs.
Barbour is the governer of Mississippi.
Hurricane Kat at Cat1 hits Florida, casualties reported
Hurricane Kat gathers strength over the Gulf reaching Cat4
Bush declares disaster areas preemptively in anticipation.
Two days before Landfall, Federal FEMA starts to stage supplies/personnel.
One day before Landfall, New Orleans Mayor (at the request of Bush) orders an evacuation. Sorta, unless you want to ride it out in the dome or at the convention center.
Lousiana has its own homeland security/fema director as well as its own National Guard units. These are controlled by the governer.
Hurricane makes landfall. Superdome damaged.
One day post-hurricane, town floods.
Two days after landfall, federal fema (who usually plays a a support role while locals "drive") in an unprecedented act has to take over a large metropolitan area.
Not only has Fema done its job, its gone beyond the call of duty. FEMA doesn't drive. FEMA is the co-pilot for large metro areas.
People point to the convention center mistake as evidence of incompetence. Whatever, it might be. However, that doesn't excuse systematic incompetence that hindered evacuation, hindered damage assessments, hindered problem assessments, blocked the flow of timely information upstream. The proper role for FEMA in New Orleans should have been assisting the locals. FEMA was caught off guard by the Mayor basically throwing up his hands. Should FEMA have takeover plans for large US cities in case of total meltdown of local fire/PD/mayor and in case of absentee state leadership?