• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bush backs Sharon Peace Proposal

Originally posted by a_unique_person
I don't get your point. The land has changed hands many times over thousands of years, the Jews cannot claim to have had any exclusive ownership of it. The people who happened to be living in it at the time modern Israel was created got the arse because the Western world felt guilty at it's responsibility for the Holocaust, and ignored the fact that Palestinians had nothing to do with it but had to pay the price for that guilt.

Yes, those poor Arabs suffered terribly as those Jewish immigrants came and purchased unused land at three or four times its value, built roads that incidentally helped Arab farmers get their crops to market faster and at greater profit, drained those malarial swamps making it possible that the average Arab peasant might have a chance to live past his teenage years without getting struck down by disease, and provided all that industry in building things so that during the Great Depression there were jobs to be had in Palestine.

Truly, it’s no wonder the Arabs wanted to kill the immigrants.
 
Of course I will return to this thread to reply to Zenith-Nadir I just want to point out to Unique and the others that personally I do not discuss if the Jews had the right to go there the first place.

This issue is resolved long ago. Even the Palestinians have accepted it as a fact I don't know why other people who live so far away are getting still in those discussions.I don't understand why every discussion about ME turns into that debate. The Jews went there and they established a recognized country. Period. Next topic.
 
Cleopatra:
"Of course I will return to this thread to reply to Zenith-Nadir I just want to point out to Unique and the others that personally I do not discuss if the Jews had the right to go there the first place.

This issue is resolved long ago. Even the Palestinians have accepted it as a fact I don't know why other people who live so far away are getting still in those discussions.I don't understand why every discussion about ME turns into that debate. The Jews went there and they established a recognized country. Period. Next topic."

Fair enough.
This is a point I took considerable time to explain to ZN but to no avail. The Palestinians, the Americans and the Israelis proceed from the position that Isreal is a reality now, even if we disagree about the subsequent direction of the debate. It is a diversion used by ZN but one I think we are right to ignore.
 
Originally posted by Cleopatra
Of course I will return to this thread to reply to Zenith-Nadir I just want to point out to Unique and the others that personally I do not discuss if the Jews had the right to go there the first place.

This issue is resolved long ago. Even the Palestinians have accepted it as a fact I don't know why other people who live so far away are getting still in those discussions.I don't understand why every discussion about ME turns into that debate. The Jews went there and they established a recognized country. Period. Next topic.

Cleopatra,

For Demon, AUP, the Fool, and others, the topic will always go back to that. It’s not about the latest thing said by Sharon or Bush, it’s not about the fence or the IDF, it’s not the hardships of people suffering or the latest atrocity. These are just peripheral issues, convenient excuses to start a dialogue where the discussion might give them an opportunity to state again their basic objection: to Jews being there to begin with.

I could go on at length as to why this is, but I’ll save that for another time.
 
Mycroft said:


Yes, those poor Arabs suffered terribly as those Jewish immigrants came and purchased unused land at three or four times its value, built roads that incidentally helped Arab farmers get their crops to market faster and at greater profit, drained those malarial swamps making it possible that the average Arab peasant might have a chance to live past his teenage years without getting struck down by disease, and provided all that industry in building things so that during the Great Depression there were jobs to be had in Palestine.

Truly, it’s no wonder the Arabs wanted to kill the immigrants.

Mate, you are one big ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊.
 
Mycroft said:


Yes, those poor Arabs suffered terribly as those Jewish immigrants came and purchased unused land at three or four times its value, built roads that incidentally helped Arab farmers get their crops to market faster and at greater profit, drained those malarial swamps making it possible that the average Arab peasant might have a chance to live past his teenage years without getting struck down by disease, and provided all that industry in building things so that during the Great Depression there were jobs to be had in Palestine.

Truly, it’s no wonder the Arabs wanted to kill the immigrants.

Ok, so you completely ducked your original point, and started off on a completely new tangent. It had nothing to do with Jewish habition for some indeterminate time in the distant past when various other groups also inhabited the area.

The real reason for the legitimacy of the occupation is that the Israelis created a better life for the Arabs.
 
Mycroft said:


Cleopatra,

For Demon, AUP, the Fool, and others, the topic will always go back to that. It’s not about the latest thing said by Sharon or Bush, it’s not about the fence or the IDF, it’s not the hardships of people suffering or the latest atrocity. These are just peripheral issues, convenient excuses to start a dialogue where the discussion might give them an opportunity to state again their basic objection: to Jews being there to begin with.

I could go on at length as to why this is, but I’ll save that for another time.

Why don't you just make it short and sweet like Skeptic does, and call us all anti-semites.

I haven't called for the destruction of Israel, but I have asked, again and again, for the inhuman treatment of the Palestinians to end, and for them to get some sort of justice.

The main reason I keep on about this topic is that there are people out there like you.
 
Originally posted by a_unique_person
Mate, you are one big f**kwit.

Lol!

The point is you keep going on and on about this terrible “price” the Arabs were asked to pay. It’s pure fiction. The truth is the Jews chose a backwards sh!thole to immigrate to, put a ton of work into making it worth something, and the worst hardship the Arabs had to put up with for all the improvement was to have non-Arab neighbors.

You also perpetuate this shallow fiction that Zionism started with the Holocaust and was created out of Western guilt, ignoring the previous 65 years of Zionist history and the centuries of anti-Semitism that culminated in the Holocaust. For all your obsession with the topic, one would think that eventually you’d get around to cracking a book open and learning something of it.

Originally posted by a_unique_person
Ok, so you completely ducked your original point, and started off on a completely new tangent. It had nothing to do with Jewish habition for some indeterminate time in the distant past when various other groups also inhabited the area.

Nope, not my point. You have me confused with someone else.

Originally posted by a_unique_person
The real reason for the legitimacy of the occupation is that the Israelis created a better life for the Arabs.

I don’t call immigration occupation. That’s something only an ignorant bigot would do.

Nor do I claim that improving the lives of the native Arabs is their claim to legitimacy. That was incidental to building a better life for themselves, but worth mentioning when you start crying oh poor oppressed Arabs! as though living near someone of a different religion/ethnicity is something so terrible that it’s worth taking up arms to kill over.

In fact, I don’t particularly think that refugees fleeing persecution really need any more legitimacy than just being refugees fleeing persecution.

Think about that for a second. We in the Western World are used to the idea of immigrants wanting to come to our countries. People from South America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East, we’re used to the idea of them wanting to come to America, Europe or Australia to find a better life. Prosperity, freedom, escape from persecution, all that.

The Jews, those early Zionists, fled the Western World to seek a better life. They went from Europe, from America to go to the third world, knowing full well there wasn’t anything there for them except the opportunity to escape where they came from and the chance that someday they might have a place where they could just be.

Something to think about.
 
Originally posted by a_unique_person
Why don't you just make it short and sweet like Skeptic does, and call us all anti-semites.

Because I don’t think the Fool really is an anti-Semite. My opinion is that he’s just too liberal to think straight and is influenced by bad company.

Originally posted by a_unique_person
I haven't called for the destruction of Israel, but I have asked, again and again, for the inhuman treatment of the Palestinians to end, and for them to get some sort of justice.

No, you do stop short of calling for the destruction of the state of Israel. You just criticize every measure she uses for self-defense, interpret every event in her history in a negative way, and moan about what a great tragedy her existence is for the Arab world.

Originally posted by a_unique_person
The main reason I keep on about this topic is that there are people out there like you.

Funny you should mention that. I came to this forum looking for stuff on magic, and ended up staying after reading the BS you were putting out in your anti-Israel campaign. I’m here because of you.

Ironic, isn’t it?
 
Mycroft said:


The Jews, those early Zionists, fled the Western World to seek a better life. They went from Europe, from America to go to the third world, knowing full well there wasn’t anything there for them except the opportunity to escape where they came from and the chance that someday they might have a place where they could just be.

Something to think about.

Just how much of a racist moron you are? I have already had more than enough time to ponder it.
 
Cleopatra said:
Of course I will return to this thread to reply to Zenith-Nadir I just want to point out to Unique and the others that personally I do not discuss if the Jews had the right to go there the first place.

This issue is resolved long ago. Even the Palestinians have accepted it as a fact I don't know why other people who live so far away are getting still in those discussions.I don't understand why every discussion about ME turns into that debate. The Jews went there and they established a recognized country. Period. Next topic.
How about answering the question I asked you? Or is that too much to ask of the great Cleopatra?

How many free passes does Arafat and the Palestinian Authority get? how many decades get to go by while no palestinian elections ever take place, how many decades get to go by while no palestinian constitution is drafted, how many decades get to go by while the Palestinian Authority lets terror groups roam wild and free? how many different American presidents get to be burnt by Arafat? how many mideast envoys must go visit Arafat's Mukata compound in futility? how many buses and restaurants in Israel need to be blown up by Hamas and Al Aksa? how many decades get to go by Cleo before Arafat and the Palestinian Authority become responsible for their failures or become irrelevant?
 
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How many free passes does Arafat and the Palestinian Authority get? how many decades get to go by while no palestinian elections ever take place, how many decades get to go by while no palestinian constitution is drafted, how many decades get to go by while the Palestinian Authority lets terror groups roam wild and free? how many different American presidents get to be burnt by Arafat? how many mideast envoys must go visit Arafat's Mukata compound in futility? how many buses and restaurants in Israel need to be blown up by Hamas and Al Aksa? how many decades get to go by Cleo before Arafat and the Palestinian Authority become responsible for their failures or become irrelevant?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this the most rhetorical questions in one post?
 
No, you do stop short of calling for the destruction of the state of Israel. You just criticize every measure she uses for self-defense, interpret every event in her history in a negative way, and moan about what a great tragedy her existence is for the Arab world.

Actally he does call for israel's destruction. He refuses to admit israel has a right to exist--despite repeated questioning--and only admits that it does in fact exist.

When you admit X exists but think X has no right to exist, it means you think it is permissible (and possibly even obligaory) to destroy X. For instance, if you say of someone that he "has no right to live", just what are you suggesting be done about him?
 
zenith-nadir said:
How about answering the question I asked you? Or is that too much to ask of the great Cleopatra?
If you expect me to reply to your questions when you want you will have to hire me. I will address your post when I will find the time and I am in the right mood, I usually think before posting I do not copy and paste homilies...
 
zenith-nadir said:
[Stand by and watch Demon and the fool try to say Wikipedia and Encarta are "lying" ;)
First a minor point... Wikipedia is bogus; you might as well reference threads on this board because the publication threshold is equally stringent.

Second... Z-N, at what point is history too old to be part of the equation? Do you advocate that Mexico has a valid claim on California? If not, why not?
 
Originally posted by varwoche
First a minor point... Wikipedia is bogus; you might as well reference threads on this board because the publication threshold is equally stringent.

I find Wikipedia fascinating and would disagree that it should be dismissed so casually. While they do occasionally have articles or editing that suffers a clear bias, they also have a peer review process that is pretty good at catching and correcting for it.

However, since the process is not perfect, I would agree that Wikipedia alone is not a perfect source, which is why I admire ZN's solution of quoting it, then backing it up with Encarta.

Originally posted by varwoche Second... Z-N, at what point is history too old to be part of the equation? Do you advocate that Mexico has a valid claim on California? If not, why not?

Great question. Why don't you answer it yourself? What should the statute of limitations be on claims of sovereignty?
 
a_unique_person said:
Why don't you just make it short and sweet like Skeptic does, and call us all anti-semites.

I haven't called for the destruction of Israel, but I have asked, again and again, for the inhuman treatment of the Palestinians to end, and for them to get some sort of justice.

The main reason I keep on about this topic is that there are people out there like you.
Hey Unique. Don't get upset if it's possible.

It is true that these days terrorism that springs mostly from religious fundamentalism is connected with the existence of Israel. EDITED TO ADD: What I mean here is that I disagree with this approach of course but now that I re-read it I realized that it can be misunderstood the way I worded it.

If you remember I have posted a couple of times so far the reason why I believe that the ME problems is not solved within 20 days. The reason is that one of the implicated part and its sponsors haven't put deep in their empty heads that Israel is a fact and it has to survive and of course the other side hasn't realized that the problem won't be solved without a viable Palestinian State.

The Palestinians who participate in the Geneva Initiative have realized very well that Israel won't survive with an arabic majority so since they really want a solution they withdrew the right of return from the negotiations.

You have to stop turning the discussion into that direction. The maltreatement of the Palestinians won't stop if Israel stops to exist and the existence of Israel has nothing to do or ok very little to do with the situation that the Palestinians are today. You have to understand that if you are interested in those people.

Think before replying to my post! Think!
 
It's a travesty of language to call anything from Sharon a "peace proposal".

Sharon has an agenda, most definitely. But mutually respectful, peaceful coexistence with Palestinians obviously isn't on it.
 
Mycroft said:
Great question. Why don't you answer it yourself? What should the statute of limitations be on claims of sovereignty?
It's a tough question Mycroft, capable of cutting both ways. This much I know: arguments dating back to 13th century, much less biblical times, should carry zero weight as to legitimacy of land claims present tense.

As to Wikipedia, I don't wish to further derail (my bad). Here's a thread where their bogosity is documented:
wikipedia is bogus thread
 

Back
Top Bottom