The claim that the US government is already targeting the family members of ISIS operative is false.
Its called collateral damage. I never said they were targeted, I said they're already being killed.
The claim that the US government is already targeting the family members of ISIS operative is false.
Actually, I've heard about the 2009 military coup in Honduras when it happened, but I didn't have it on the radar until this item, and those who never heard a single word about it are likely in the vast majority of "news followers".
Trump said we should kill their families. This is a fact. Think about this deeply, actually do some research, then talk to me in the morning.Its called collateral damage. I never said they were targeted, I said they're already being killed.
None, we have our own interests.
Bernout Sanders will be 79 years old in the year 2020.
The oldest president to assume office was Ronald Reagan, at age 69.
Better still,what if he chose some key states and some good candidates to back and got a bunch of E Warrens elected to the Senate and a few in the House?
And what if he took up the cause of eliminating gerrymandering?
Think of the progress we could all make in that case.
Hate to agree with logger but Bernie is done.
I'm just the opposite, but like you, Sanders was available!![]()
For some reason it is quite easy to imagine that this is a common state for you.
People interested in progress vote that way, those who don't, obviously aren't.
Sanders pretty much is a Bull Moose.
...That party’s nickname can in part trace its routes to a speech given in the very Milwaukee auditorium where Republican presidential candidates debated in November. Outside the theater on October 14, 1912, an anarchist shot the former president who went ahead and delivered his remarks with a bullet lodged in his chest. The wounded Roosevelt, who tried to recapture the office he left in 1909, informed the audience, “I have just been shot—but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose.” He noted that his life was likely spared when the bullet was slowed down as it passed through the lengthy (and thick) speech in his coat pocket.
Perhaps the reason the Republican candidate who shared that stage did not invoke TR was the message he delivered from that stage: “The laboring man must organize for his own protection, but that it is the duty of the rest of us to help him.”
That same year, the Bull Moose Party platform, written by Roosevelt, laid out one of the most progressive platforms in American history calling for “the protection of the home life against the hazards of sickness, irregular employment and old age through a system of social insurance adopted to American use.”
...What is Bernie Sanders asking of the country as he begins his presidential campaign? A fairer economic system pried loose from the people who nearly wrecked it all four years ago. Legitimately progressive taxation. That the country acknowledge, with its money, that we all need bridges and roads and water systems. Honest elections. Recognition that environmental crises are national crises. Theodore Roosevelt could have run on those issues, and once did.
A long time ago, I met a guy named Frank P. Zeidler. He was a Socialist and once he was the mayor of Milwaukee, the last Socialist to be elected mayor of a major American city. (Milwaukee elected three of them, as Alice Cooper once informed Wayne Campbell.) Zeidler won his first election, as Milwaukee County Surveyor, on the Progressive Party line, as a Bull Moose liberal. Once, I heard him say that, when he was coming up, what made you a Socialist was the fact that you believed your city should fix potholes and that it should have a fire department. As Bernie Sanders begins his run for president in an era in which people scream "Socialist!" as a kind of conjuring word to make moderate reforms vanish, it's probably important to remember that being a Socialist once meant that you shouldn't have to put out your own fires. That's Bernie Sanders's campaign -- he's the last Bull Moose in the forest.
How is this not a non sequitur to my post?
Nope. Just watch.
WTF?You have chosen to vote in a conservative manner, which belies a self purported interest in progress.
Nope, nothing there about conservative voting or "People interested in progress vote that way, those who don't, obviously aren't."SG said:Better still,what if he chose some key states and some good candidates to back and got a bunch of E Warrens elected to the Senate and a few in the House?
And what if he took up the cause of eliminating gerrymandering?
Think of the progress we could all make in that case.
WTF?
[Looks at post in question]
Nope, nothing there about conservative voting or "People interested in progress vote that way, those who don't, obviously aren't."
![]()
Better still,what if he chose some key states and some good candidates to back and got a bunch of E Warrens elected to the Senate and a few in the House?
And what if he took up the cause of eliminating gerrymandering?
Think of the progress we could all make in that case.
You don't achieve progress by acting conservatively and supporting conservative paths.
Depends how you define "progress".
Remember, people who support Trump think the nation will progress under him.
You don't achieve progress by acting conservatively and supporting conservative paths.
Pray tell what you see that is conservative voting in that quote.SG said:Better still,what if he chose some key states and some good candidates to back and got a bunch of E Warrens elected to the Senate and a few in the House?
And what if he took up the cause of eliminating gerrymandering?
Think of the progress we could all make in that case.