I dunno, why don't you try posting their pictures
Here are some named Gaza-Freedom-White-People-Telling-Brown-People-What-To-Do March participants- one's I've found so far from quick google:
What proportion of brown to white people must there be in a group before the group becomes a white and brown group?
I'm starting bets how many pages this thread will have.
Who says 20?
Ok a group of white and brown...... North Americans and Europeans.
Privileged westerners any way you slice it.
That's OK Jane, it's normal to feel anger and outrage when you find that some of "the other' has been co-opted by the privileged white west and even joined in with them in using that privilege to invade a sovereign nation and interfere in their affairs.
I trust you slept well, dreaming of the journey we've embarked upon, a journey that will make you a double plus good anti-racism/anti-oppression activist and allow you the insights needed to storm through the forums here at the JREF identifying and correcting unacceptable language.
So...the first step you need do is to publicly acknowledge your privileges, which will serve as an admission that you're actually part of the problem but taking active steps to counter that.
You need to answer a few questions, publicly.
Are you a member of the dominant society ?
Are you male ?
Is your family middle or ruling class (read elite) ?
Do you speak the dominant language of the country you live in ?
Do you have any formal education ?
Is your current gender the one you feel you should be living with ?
Are you heterosexual ?
Are you able bodied ?
Do you live in the country you were born in ?
I know grappling with your demons is challenging, I tried it and failed and remain a boring ole' centrist whose to grounded in reality but Dammit Janet, errr, sorry, Jane I sense you have the potential to do great things.
Need help with the questions ?
Then talk to Maysie, she'll help.
Yes, it is valid![]()
We talkin about Egypt, so we talking about circumcized females land.I look forward to you referring to Israel as "circumcised peoples land".
Hi Rufo
While my point may not seem valid when discussed using everyday, people are people politics, I do think I have a case if we switch to far left politics and use race, privilege (class) as the benchmarks for what the left assumes is motivates everybody else in their relationships with others, and "the other"
Yes, it was an international effort, mainly an effort from the very same countries that the far left accuses of screwing up the world and the same countries the far left accuse of supporting the "apartheid" system that currently defines the relationship Israel has with the Palestinians, usually referred to as "the west"
I think they were out to patronise the Egyptian government, to try to embarrass them into redefining their relationship with Gaza to something more in line with their far left politics. It's using those very same far-left politics that I'm basing my assumptions on. In the real world, however, I'll agree, my premise is insignificant.
My colonial reference had more to do with how the far-left views the creation/existence of Israel. We have what basically amounts to a bunch of Europeans colonising lands that they aren't native to and this is what sparks the far left's objection to anything other than the one state solution.
I do agree, the colonisation angle does not apply to the Gaza Freedom Marchers.
We talkin about Egypt, so we talking about circumcized females land.
A bit impolite, but some social pressure of this kind would be a good idea actually.