Now that some context has been provided, we might see what this person was trying to achieve by referring to Egypt in that way. This looks like a small part of a bigger discussion, but I think it's an attempt to reference colonialism. By referring to Egypt as "brown people's land", this person may have been trying to say that white people going there to tell the people living there how to do things has colonialist undertones (people with predominantly brighter skin patronizing people with predominantly darker skin).
Yes, exactly
I'm the one who used this term in that context
DC, thinking he had a real live racist on the line went all politically correct on me, calling the term "offensive" with out the slightest clue that this is used regularly by people within the PC movement.
See here
So if the hardcore PCers, the people who run around calling "racism" every chance they get are not offended and use the term itself, I'm thinking DC's focus on my use of the term betrays not only a lack of understanding of the terminology he chose to attack, but an inability to even remotely grasp the point I was trying to make.
Which is succinctly quoted above.
So, I'll agree to the term being stupid. hey, I didn't coin it, but I figure that if anyone is going to support a group ( in this case a group if international protesters who flew to Egypt to protest at the Gaza border) that should person should be at least remotely familiar with the politics of the people he chooses to defend.
In this case, DC was defending the actions of a far left group, a group IMO who fails to live up to their own ideology and if Dc is capable of engaging that argument, then bring it on.
But screaming racism, when there is clearly no racism present is nothing more than a self aggrandizing cheap shot.