Brexit: Now What? Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brexit will not lead to Mad-Max style world, says David Davis.

that's good news then.

But it's a bit of a change from the promises of utopia to giving reassurance it's not going to be the complete collapse of society and civilisation as we know it.
 
Ah Davis giving us more of the inspiring rhetoric that we've come to expect from the Brexiters. Although we seem to have gone from "sunlit uplands" and "£350 million a week for the NHS" to "at least we won't make you fight in the Thunderdome".
 
Last edited:
Brexit will not lead to Mad-Max style world, says David Davis.

that's good news then.

But it's a bit of a change from the promises of utopia to giving reassurance it's not going to be the complete collapse of society and civilisation as we know it.

Yes, that really is a not-so-subtle change in the messaging. When we were in the early stages of the Brexit process and a large chunk of the UK population weren't informed of the complexities and interconnection of the negotiations, and the fundamental contradictions in the position favoured by Brexiteers it was all going to be moonbeams and unicorns.

Our trading relationship with the EU would continue as before. We'd be able to go to the EU unhindered but they wouldn't be able to come here. We wouldn't have to abide by EU laws and standards and yet would enjoy unfettered tariff-free access to the EEA. We'd also have 40+ free trade agreements in place on day 1 and the world would be beating a path to our door to make those relationships even more advantageous for the UK.

As a Remoaner, it's been obvious to me that the only way that the UK can become more competitive is to drop "expensive" EU worker and environmental protections so that we compete with the developing world on price and not the developed world on innovation and quality. It's also pretty clear that any large economy (in other words one with whom it's worth cultivating a major trade relationship) is likely to have the whip hand in negotiations post-Brexit when a UK government needs to make face-saving trade deals in a hurry.

This news from David Davis is not reassuring. If he's willing to admit that things are going to be bad, imagine how bad they're really going to be. :mad:
 
Hmm I think it is going to be a no deal hard brexit when the timeline on article 50 runs out next year. The UK might simply be intending to kick the can down the road indefinitely but with no progress will the EU nations give an extension?

This thread makes me happy, you might not have us beat for stupidity in government but at least we have some competition.
 
A number of Brexit getting ready to stitch up Ireland. The you seem to be pushing the line that the Good Friday Agreement is already 'broken' and should be scrapped.
 
A number of Brexit getting ready to stitch up Ireland. The you seem to be pushing the line that the Good Friday Agreement is already 'broken' and should be scrapped.

I suspect that the good captain is a victim of predictive text on his phone. I think this should read:

"A number of Brexiteers are getting ready to stitch up Ireland. They seem to be pushing the line that the Good Friday Agreement is already 'broken' and should be scrapped."

Not sure how that would play with the DUP but a scrapping of the GFA followed by a resumption of "The Troubles" would be another thing that Brexiteers would seek to lay at the EU's door :mad:

It's bad enough gambling with people's livelihoods, but gambling with people's lives is IMO despicable.
 
Brexit will not lead to Mad-Max style world, says David Davis.

that's good news then.

But it's a bit of a change from the promises of utopia to giving reassurance it's not going to be the complete collapse of society and civilisation as we know it.

I think that speech was more intended to rebut Reese-Mogg's pronouncements than anything else. Not because Rees-Mogg was wrong, but because he was revealing the government's real Brexit plan before the next election is out of the way.

Meanwhile the Daily Mail cares about none of this, they are frothing about the fact that 35 years ago Jeremy Corbyn met an intelligence from one country that no longer exists who reported to another country that no longer exists either...
Yes, that really is a not-so-subtle change in the messaging. When we were in the early stages of the Brexit process and a large chunk of the UK population weren't informed of the complexities and interconnection of the negotiations, and the fundamental contradictions in the position favoured by Brexiteers it was all going to be moonbeams and unicorns.

We've gone from sunshine and puppies to light drizzle and a promise you won't have to eat a puppy to stay alive.
 
Last edited:
He could just be refering to the fact that the Mad Max movies didn't have rain.

Oddly enough, that's pretty much what I said to my colleagues when we were discussing this today. It won't be like Mad Max, because that was quite dusty.
 
...
Meanwhile the Daily Mail cares about none of this, they are frothing about the fact that 35 years ago Jeremy Corbyn met an intelligence from one country that no longer exists who reported to another country that no longer exists either...
...

The good news about such rags is that they have their audience but I don't believe they're going to recruit any more. Possibly the reverse.
 
New Conservative Contact Law Announced-:

"Break a Deal, Face the Wheel"

Henceforth Gove and Johnson to be refered to as "Master Blaster".
 
I suspect that the good captain is a victim of predictive text on his phone. I think this should read:

"A number of Brexiteers are getting ready to stitch up Ireland. They seem to be pushing the line that the Good Friday Agreement is already 'broken' and should be scrapped."

Not sure how that would play with the DUP but a scrapping of the GFA followed by a resumption of "The Troubles" would be another thing that Brexiteers would seek to lay at the EU's door :mad:

It's bad enough gambling with people's livelihoods, but gambling with people's lives is IMO despicable.

Oops yes you are right, was typing that on my crummy phone.
 
The good news about such rags is that they have their audience but I don't believe they're going to recruit any more. Possibly the reverse.

Which is what they don't seem to understand, their readers already hate Corbyn and barring revelations that he was a KGB mole no one else really cares.

Their Brexit coverage doesn't rise above how evil the EU is.
 
Which is what they don't seem to understand, their readers already hate Corbyn and barring revelations that he was a KGB mole no one else really cares.

Their Brexit coverage doesn't rise above how evil the EU is.

And as Ken Clarke has said, Corbyn would be less of a disaster than this current government's course.
 
Which is what they don't seem to understand, their readers already hate Corbyn and barring revelations that he was a KGB mole no one else really cares.

<snip>


At least you've got that much. Our entire Presidential Administration is in the pocket of the Russians, from the President on down, with the leaders of their party in both chambers of Congress aiding and abetting at every opportunity, and none of their supporters could care less.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom