Nonsense. A 757 flown at high speeds while turning is not easy to control. There is nothing speculative about that. A 757 flown in an "unsafe manner" is not easy to control.
Why are you wrong on all things 911? Are you a pilot?
Kids without flight training could fly as good as or better than the terrorists on 911. The terrorists were so unsure, they got trained! Making up false statements like you do prove you lack knowledge and are easy to fool.
Please show a manuver on 911 that was hard to do. Inclued bank angle, pitch angles, and vertical acceleration.
Flight 11 was level flight, something the plane does all by itself.
Flight 175, a slight bank and descending into the WTC, no flying skill required.
Flight 77, the terrorist pilot has the "largest target" (wide) on 911, he was flying so bad but he still hit it! He was in constant PIO for the last 30 seconds, it was horrible, he almost hit the road where he knocked down the lampposts. Up to the final 20 seconds, Hanni had not done anything a pilot on a first flight could not do without training, and then he proved it.
Flight 93, it takes no skill at all to fly a plane erratically and then hit the ground; the earth is the biggest target on earth! Easy to hit! I know of no pilots, trained or not trained who can't hit mother earth without trying.
"I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon," the former employee said. "He could not fly at all."
Crashing into the Pentagon is not flying, it is crashing! He was right, your conclusion is wrong. Saying a pilot, the terrorist pilots were pilots, can' fly is like saying a trained driver can't drive; an exaggeration based on an opinion. Do you call crashing into the Pentagon flying? It is terrorism. You almost got something right, but not.
That was a quote from just one of his instructors. That was a Cessna. But now he's making extreme descending turns and planning contingencies and preparing strafing runs in a 757 which he's never flown in his life.
It is harder to fly a Cessna single engine plane than a 767/757. I have flown both large jets and small prop planes; would rather fly a 767/757. I would not be surprised if the terrorists picked the 767/757 since they were very easy to hand fly.
You are telling lies, there were no extreme descending turns, and it was not a strafing run, it was point and aim. You are wrong on this point, failure is the best you can do.
Yeah, "he liked that side"? That's why he performed the maneuver he did and decided to hit the Pentagon at it's most difficult angle? His attraction to western faces of short buildings?
There are no difficult angles to hit the Pentagon, it is one of the largest office buildings in the world. What are you talking about? You have no clue.
