• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Breaking news! Truther Ignored by Senator!

Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.

Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.

Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.

Start a new thread to get your claims torn apart. Or simply do the research and debunk yourself.
 
I keep writing in requesting that my penis be declared a national treasure, and I am also being ignored. What on earth do senators do with all of their time???
 
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.

Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.

Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.

This crap is definantly not worth looking into. :rolleyes:

2.25 seconds free fall? And in those 2.25 seconds, did WTC7 reach 120 mph?! :eye-poppi

Again, the Laws of Physics wasn't "broken". :crowded:
 
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.

Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.

Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.

LOL, somebody got a Gage-bot for christmas.
 
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.

Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.

Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.

Have you written your senator about this? I didn't think so.
 
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.

Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.

Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.
anim_head_slap.gif
 
I'm fascinated by how truthers can tell the speed of the collapses even after they are behind the dust cloud. Do truthers have x-ray vision?

:)
 
This just in: The "truth" movement is a tiny cult ignored by the rest of the world. Film at eleven.
 
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.

Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.

Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.

Although this has already been discussed and beaten to death!
 
Yawn.

New sock puppet?
I can see you've never heard of the forum search facility.

Dave

I had nothing to search for at the time. Someone said this wasn't worth looking into, and I disagreed.

congratulations on getting basically nothing right

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for civility.


i wasted some 3 years looking into it. Until i realized i have fallen for a bunch of liars.

So not only have you been duped, but you've been duped into thinking you've been duped. That takes... uniqueness.

Start a new thread to get your claims torn apart. Or simply do the research and debunk yourself.

I responded on topic in this thread. I'm sorry it upsets you.

LOL, somebody got a Gage-bot for christmas.

Have you written your senator about this? I didn't think so.

Yawn.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I had nothing to search for at the time. Someone said this wasn't worth looking into, and I disagreed.



Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited moderated content.




So not only have you been duped, but you've been duped into thinking you've been duped. That takes... uniqueness.



I responded on topic in this thread. I'm sorry it upsets you.





Yawn.
You forgot, "defied the laws of gravity".


:rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I responded on topic in this thread. I'm sorry it upsets you.

I always like when Truthers think somehow they've upset someone. All you're doing is making the same statements over and over again! If there's any feeling I get it's a feeling of sheer boredom!
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom