Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
The only thing newsworthy about this story is that this imbecile is surprised he's being ignored.
The only thing newsworthy about this story is that this imbecile is surprised he's being ignored.
Wrong. Not even that is newsworthy.The only thing newsworthy about this story is that this imbecile is surprised he's being ignored.
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.
Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.
Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.
Start a new thread to get your claims torn apart. Or simply do the research and debunk yourself.
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.
Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.
Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.


2.25 seconds free fall? And in those 2.25 seconds, did WTC7 reach 120 mph?!![]()
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.
Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.
Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.
free fall doesn't mean instant teminal velocity, Chewbacca.
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.
Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.
Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.
Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.
Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.
I'm fascinated by how truthers can tell the speed of the collapses even after they are behind the dust cloud. Do truthers have x-ray vision?
![]()
Well actually, "their crap" is worth looking into. Both Twin Towers collapsed at a constant rate of acceleration, meaning crash zones, which we have been told caused the collapses, offered no less resistance than undamaged sections of those buildings, which isn't possible.
Also, WTC 7 was in free fall for 2.25 seconds even though steel offers a minimum amount of resistance to collapse. This is also not possible if only the only dead load is WTC 7's own components.
Two physical impossibilities are most definitely worth looking into.
Yawn.
New sock puppet?
I can see you've never heard of the forum search facility.
Dave
congratulations on getting basically nothing right
i wasted some 3 years looking into it. Until i realized i have fallen for a bunch of liars.
Start a new thread to get your claims torn apart. Or simply do the research and debunk yourself.
LOL, somebody got a Gage-bot for christmas.
Have you written your senator about this? I didn't think so.
You forgot, "defied the laws of gravity".I had nothing to search for at the time. Someone said this wasn't worth looking into, and I disagreed.
Edited by jhunter1163:Edited moderated content.
So not only have you been duped, but you've been duped into thinking you've been duped. That takes... uniqueness.
I responded on topic in this thread. I'm sorry it upsets you.
Yawn.
I responded on topic in this thread. I'm sorry it upsets you.