Of course they can vote, just not in Israeli elections.
Just like Puerto Ricans can vote, just not in United States elections.
Puerto Ricans have chosen to remain a Commonweath. Let us know when the Palestinians get to vote on their own fate.
Of course they can vote, just not in Israeli elections.
Just like Puerto Ricans can vote, just not in United States elections.
Now it's not just Arabs in Jerusalem, but Palestinians in general.Puerto Ricans have chosen to remain a Commonweath. Let us know when the Palestinians get to vote on their own fate.
Now it's not just Arabs in Jerusalem, but Palestinians in general.
That goalpost is on wheels!
It's not if they don't want to be Israeli citizens and vote. Is there some law preventing them from becoming Israeli citizens parky?do Palestinian tax-payers who are permanent residents of Israel, in East Jerusalem, have the right to vote in parliamentary elections?
no? than that is Apartheid.
It's not if they don't want to be Israeli citizens and vote. Is there some law preventing them from becoming Israeli citizens parky?
do Palestinian tax-payers who are permanent residents of Israel, in East Jerusalem, have the right to vote in parliamentary elections?
no? than that is Apartheid.
Do Puerto Rican tax-payers who are citizens of the United States, have the right to vote in Presidential elections?
What's that parky/Thunder? You admit that they can become citizens, but for whatever reason chose not to? And now you're whining that they can't vote?Do Palestinians in "East Jerusalem" still have the right to obtain automatic citizenship? They did in 1967.
What's that parky/Thunder? You admit that they can become citizens, but for whatever reason chose not to?
"Appears" that way? What evidence do you have to back up that claim?um....this is 2010...not 1967. it appears they were given a one time offer.
I wonder if Palestinians born in East Jerusalem after 1967...are given the same offer when they hit 18?
what do you think Wildcat? "Cat" got ya tongue?
"Appears" that way? What evidence do you have to back up that claim?
in 1967, Israel offered citizenship to the Palestinians of "East Jerusalem".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Jerusalem#Residency
The PA has absolutely no pressure on them to act. The Obama administration has done its best to put all the pressure on Israel to make another bout of fruitless concessions, blaming Israel for a malady of unrelated issues, ie:The current method is too vague and loose.
It isn't sustainable for four months, especially since it is understood in advance that there will be complaints of "new violations" by one side or the other that will invariably cause the talks to be suspended, leaving everyone back on square one.
Does this sound familiar?INDYK EVEN went to the length of reiterating that Israeli intransigence was contributing to US military casualties – a manifestly untrue accusation (as Indyk himself must know) – repudiated by Gen. David Petraeus, who emphasized the positive aspects of Israel as a strategic ally. Indyk effectively claimed that American soldiers were dying because Israelis are endangering “a vital national security interest for the United States,” presumably by building apartments in Jewish neighborhoods in east Jerusalem.
In subsequent more explicit comments, Indyk said 200,000 US troops are fighting terrorism and Obama is obliged to write between 30 and 40 condolence letters a month – far more than the Israeli prime minister. Such chilling remarks from a mainstream American Jewish public figure have the capacity of inflicting enormous damage on Israel and the Jewish community.
Indyk also repeats the absurdity that by making more unilateral concessions to the Palestinians, Israel will enable the US to resolve the Iranian nuclear threat, again linking the construction freeze in Jerusalem with Obama’s ability to deal with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
This balderdash is compounded when he also urges Israel to cede the Golan to Syria – ignoring the latter’s alliance with Iran and its increasing aggressiveness toward Israel.
...
stop flapping.. There are going to be talks... Sorry, but the far right in Israel is losing its power to drive the agenda. get used to it...The PA has absolutely no pressure on them to act. The Obama administration has done its best to put all the pressure on Israel to make another bout of fruitless concessions, blaming Israel for a malady of unrelated issues, ie:
From pro-Israel to anti-Israel apologist
Does this sound familiar?