Brand New CT sub-group: No-Sounders

[LastChild]

You have 3 people in that video who you think could confirm bombs going off on 9/11 and you won't contact them?

Where the hell did I even claim to know they were bombs? Can't you even follow the thread? Do you need glasses as well as a hearing aid?

I claimed they were loud as demolition charges and provided the video that compares them.

Do microphones only pick up loud noises that are bombs? Are you another expert?

YOU FAIL AGAIN

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Where the hell did I even claim to know they were bombs? Can't you even follow the thread? Do you need glasses as well as a hearing aid?

I claimed they were loud as demolition charges and provided the video that compares them.

Do microphones only pick up loud noises that are bombs? Are you another expert?

YOU FAIL AGAIN

What are the distinctive characteristics, that can be observed in multimedia, that distinguish between "demolition charges" and "bombs"? Unless it can be demonstrated that they are distinguishable then, in the context of this thread, it is perfectly reasonable to use the two terms interchangeably.

 

[WildCat]

Where the hell did I even claim to know they were bombs?

So why did you post it?

I claimed they were loud as demolition charges and provided the video that compares them.

So the sound which you can't even show wasn't dubbed into the video, nor what time of day it allegedly happened, nor who filmed it or where, nor even who the people in it are, yet you somehow think it's the same sound in another video?

Do microphones only pick up loud noises that are bombs? Are you another expert?

You're the one claiming microphones can be of some magical design that won't pick up loud noises. And while I've never claimed to be an expert, i guarantee you I have far more experience with microphones and recording loud events than you do.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

I ask again. Did everyone do their job properly leading up to and on 9/11 to protect the US? Stop dodging. Did someone's head roll? Because I missed it.

BTW as far as explosives and this thread goes and what I asked for....?

YOU CONTINUE TO FAIL

And the conspiracy shuffle jumps to the next argument. Dance dance dance little monkey!

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Where the hell did I even claim to know they were bombs? Can't you even follow the thread? Do you need glasses as well as a hearing aid?

I claimed they were loud as demolition charges and provided the video that compares them.

Do microphones only pick up loud noises that are bombs? Are you another expert?

YOU FAIL AGAIN

And how again did you determine they were as loud as demolition charges? How did you determine where and when they were?

 

[LastChild]

So why did you post it?

What do you want cliff notes? If you can't read the thread I can't help you.

So the sound which you can't even show wasn't dubbed into the video, nor what time of day it allegedly happened, nor who filmed it or where, nor even who the people in it are, yet you somehow think it's the same sound in another video?

I'm suppose to show it wasn't dubbed into the video? LOL Was it my claim it was fake? Why don't you go ask Gravy to do that for his piece of crap movie? You're sounding like a no planer who wants someone to prove the videos aren't fake. Have many conspiracy theories do you? LOL

You're the one claiming microphones can be of some magical design that won't pick up loud noises.

Wrong

And while I've never claimed to be an expert, i guarantee you I have far more experience with microphones and recording loud events than you do.

That must be some good stuff you smoke. LOL

LETS REVIEW...

WRONG

WRONG

WRONG

CONGRATULATIONS YOU STILL FAIL

 

[LastChild]

What are the distinctive characteristics, that can be observed in multimedia, that distinguish between "demolition charges" and "bombs"? Unless it can be demonstrated that they are distinguishable then, in the context of this thread, it is perfectly reasonable to use the two terms interchangeably.

Fine but not when someone starts asking me to prove they were bombs. I never claimed to know they were.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Yes you DID clam that the microphones were responsible for the demolition charges not being picked up. Please stop lying LC. When that was proven to be nonsense, you moved on to compression. When that was shown to be nonsense, you started arguing that it's because the building wasn't gutted.

Please continue to act like a 6 year old though. We're really impressed by your caps.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Fine but not when someone starts asking me to prove they were bombs. I never claimed to know they were.

So you agree then that there is no real evidence of bombs bringing down the WTC?

 

[LastChild]

And how again did you determine they were as loud as demolition charges? How did you determine where and when they were?

Go back and watch the comparison video. I'm not reposting it. Do your own work.

 

[LastChild]

So you agree then that there is no real evidence of bombs bringing down the WTC?

I agree there has been no real investigation that might make such a finding.

 

[LastChild]

Yes you DID clam that the microphones were responsible for the demolition charges not being picked up. Please stop lying LC. When that was proven to be nonsense, you moved on to compression. When that was shown to be nonsense, you started arguing that it's because the building wasn't gutted.

Please continue to act like a 6 year old though. We're really impressed by your caps.

What I claimed was depending on where and when the charges went off and where the microphone was and what kind it was it wouldn't have necessarily picked it up over the sound of the collapsing wtc in the video Gravy uses in his comparison.

Now what was your response to that and how does it hold up to the explosive sounds I have provided?

 

[Good Lt]

I agree there has been no real investigation that might make such a finding.

Yes, there was.

Just because you don't like its conclusions doesn't mean there wasn't a real investigation.

Likewise, there is no evidence - NONE - to support any conspiracy fantasy about 9-11. And there was no investigation that came to the conclusion that 9-11 was an inside job either.

Looks like you've got nothing. Again.

What I claimed was depending on where and when the charges went off and where the microphone was and what kind it was it wouldn't have necessarily picked it up over the sound of the collapsing wtc in the video Gravy uses in his comparison.

Now what was your response to that and how does it hold up to the explosive sounds I have provided?

You, before:

Fine but not when someone starts asking me to prove they were bombs. I never claimed to know they were.

You just said that you don't know if there were any bombs, and now you're claiming that you've provided "sounds of explosions," which you didn't.

 

[mortimer]

I agree there has been no real investigation that might make such a finding.

Can you explain how an investigation now could determine whether or not there were demolition charges in the buildings?

 

[SDC]

Can you explain how an investigation now could determine whether or not there were demolition charges in the buildings?

Put together a panel of distinguished Truthers.

"I'll be judge and I'll be jury," said cunning old Fury.
"I'll try the whole cause and condemn you to death."

(Alice in Wonderland.)

 

[LastChild]

Yes, there was.

Just because you don't like its conclusions doesn't mean there wasn't a real investigation.

Just because you like the results doesn't mean it was real.

Likewise, there is no evidence - NONE - to support any conspiracy fantasy about 9-11. And there was no investigation that came to the conclusion that 9-11 was an inside job either.

Last I looked there wasn't any hard evidence connecting UBL to 9/11 either. I also just saw something in the news about CIA confession tapes and an investigation as to why the tapes were destroyed. Is that some of your evidence? Did the tapes go the same way as the WTC steel?

Looks like you've got nothing. Again.

I don't think anyone has much of anything in regards to 9/11 because there hasn't been a real investigation. Though some people insist they know the truth. I just don't know what they're basing that belief on. Is it an agenda?

You, before:

You just said that you don't know if there were any bombs, and now you're claiming that you've provided "sounds of explosions," which you didn't.

Holy crap who's on first? Are bombs and explosions the same thing?

idontknow third base

YOU FAIL

 

[DavidJames]

Last I looked there wasn't any hard evidence connecting UBL to 9/11 either. I also just saw something in the news about CIA confession tapes and an investigation as to why the tapes were destroyed. Is that some of your evidence? Did the tapes go the same way as the WTC steel?

Does bouncing around topics so much make your head hurt? Do you find you are unable to maintain a coherent thought process. Please go here to seek some help.

 

[LastChild]

Can you explain how an investigation now could determine whether or not there were demolition charges in the buildings?

I don't know if it is possible at this point to determine if there was evidence of demolition charges or not. The crime scene has been some what tampered with and no one was really looking for it at the time. I mean they weren't even worried about finding all the remains of victims and firefighters that was possible to be found. Just scoop and dump. There could however be further investigation into other areas though.

 

[332nd]

I don't know if it is possible at this point to determine if there was evidence of demolition charges or not. The crime scene has been some what tampered with and no one was really looking for it at the time. I mean they weren't even worried about finding all the remains of victims and firefighters that was possible to be found. Just scoop and dump. There could however be further investigation into other areas though.

Where did you get this idea from?

 

[LastChild]

Does bouncing around topics so much make your head hurt? Do you find you are unable to maintain a coherent thought process. Please go here to seek some help.

No why does yours? Are you having comprehension problems again? Is it all going too fast for you to follow? Don't worry you're not alone. It seems many of the so-called critical thinkers are having the same problem.

You also have a lot of company at FAILING.

So don’t feel so bad.