• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Boston Marathon CTs

I've yet to see someone post it on the internetz but surely it can't take long.


I just saw the following status update from a "friend" on Facebook:

"aamerica gets bombed and now a 7.8 earthquake in the mioddle east, americas respone with the haarp weather manipulator"

Time for a Facebook Cull I think.
 
trustbutverify said:
If the fascist US regime thinks it can avoid the Holmes-like detective skills of ATS's finest, they better wake up and smell the RedBull!


reply posted on 15-4-2013 @ 05:18 PM by AllGloryIsGods
So why were guys in full military fatigues going in AHEAD of the police even before the smoke cleared? Just want to get that on record. Was watching this live and saw two guys in full military fatigues going in ahead of the police 10 seconds after the explosion. They didn't even evacuate they just ran straight in like they knew how many bombs were going to go off and that they were safe.

This whole thing smells. When did it become the job of the military to respond on American soil? The Cops were following the guys in fatigues for crying out loud. This whole thing screams false flag. I am guessing there is legislation they are having a hard time getting through so they need to put the sheeple to sleep.

All glory is Gods, indeed.

This post has me puzzled for a couple of reasons. First, the poster claims to have been watching the marathon live. Was anyone actually broadcasting live coverage of the marathon so late? This was long after the winners had won.

Second, and this is more speculative, but if I were watching the live marathon and there were a sudden explosion, I'm sure I wouldn't have the wherewithal to notice who was running to the scene first. I suppose, however, in this day of PVRs when we can rewind live video, this is easily explained. But has anyone actually seen a video showing that first-responders included military personnel? And would that be terribly surprising, or were uniformed national guardsmen on hand at the site?
 
Yeah there were some guys in fatigues who ran right in and started clearing the site. I saw it in the Globe video I think.

And that doesn't surprise me. If anyone can shove aside instinct and run towards danger it would be trained military people.
 
This post has me puzzled for a couple of reasons. First, the poster claims to have been watching the marathon live. Was anyone actually broadcasting live coverage of the marathon so late? This was long after the winners had won.

It's really an all-day event here. As a matter of fact, speaking as a local, I think the majority of the focus is on the "everyman" runner, as opposed to the elites. They're showing live shots 7+ hours after the event for the really, really late runners even.

Second, and this is more speculative, but if I were watching the live marathon and there were a sudden explosion, I'm sure I wouldn't have the wherewithal to notice who was running to the scene first. I suppose, however, in this day of PVRs when we can rewind live video, this is easily explained. But has anyone actually seen a video showing that first-responders included military personnel? And would that be terribly surprising, or were uniformed national guardsmen on hand at the site?

Yes, I've seen it. There was a contingent that ran with 40lb sacks on them for charity. There's almost always a large contingent of soldiers at major sporting events. I remember going to the Pats game and they had a ceremony at halftime. There were at least a hundred uniformed soldiers there.
 
This post has me puzzled for a couple of reasons. First, the poster claims to have been watching the marathon live. Was anyone actually broadcasting live coverage of the marathon so late? This was long after the winners had won.

Second, and this is more speculative, but if I were watching the live marathon and there were a sudden explosion, I'm sure I wouldn't have the wherewithal to notice who was running to the scene first. I suppose, however, in this day of PVRs when we can rewind live video, this is easily explained. But has anyone actually seen a video showing that first-responders included military personnel? And would that be terribly surprising, or were uniformed national guardsmen on hand at the site?

I didn't see it live of course, but there was a video that showed two men in simple fatigues, not carrying any equipment, who jumped in and helped other volunteers remove the fencing that separated the crowd from the street. This was within a minute of the bombings. I had the impression that they were simply watching the race and jumped into help like 100's of other people yesterday.
 
But has anyone actually seen a video showing that first-responders included military personnel? And would that be terribly surprising, or were uniformed national guardsmen on hand at the site?
This one? You can see two guys in military fatigues running forward to help. They're either spectators or volunteers. Whatever, they're using their military training - a couple of Mr Rogers' 'helpers'.
 
Thanks to everyone who pointed out the guys in fatigues. I see them now.

No idea why that's suspicious, aside from the fact that everything is suspicious to some folks, and anything connected to the U.S. government triply so.
 
Here CNN cites a Cross Country coach saying it is 'odd' that there were bomb sniffing dogs and that it seems like they knew in advance...
http://www.local15tv.com/mostpopula...Spotters-on-Roofs/BrirjAzFPUKKN8z6eSDJEA.cspx
A cross-country coach is the expert on telling the different between normal police K-9's patrolling a crowded international sporting event, and bomb-sniffing dogs?


Here is the classic mysterious shadowy figure watching over the results of his bombing
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...bombing-prompts-speculation-article-1.1317947
He can't see the explosions from that vantage... that's glaringly obvious. Most likely someone going to the front edge to see what the explosions were.
 
A cross-country coach is the expert on telling the different between normal police K-9's patrolling a crowded international sporting event, and bomb-sniffing dogs?



He can't see the explosions from that vantage... that's glaringly obvious. Most likely someone going to the front edge to see what the explosions were.

If I'm not mistaken, the photo showing the man on the roof also shows the first explosion. How could he have reacted by the time the photo was shot?

ETA: Nope. It was the second explosion. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=48482

Even the loonies at GOODF are in on it. CT bingo going on over there - FEMA death camps, mass-produced coffins, the Patriot Act and paid "crisis" actors all get a mention in connection with this bombing.

The one thing that doesn't get mentioned? Sympathy for those affected.

Absolutely vile.

Well of course not. That would entail admitting there really WERE victims and not just actors in a play.
 
Don't know about the US situation, but in the UK it would be odd if police bomb sniffing dogs didn't do a sweep before a high profile public event.

Of course they don't make a public spectacle of it. If you happen to be working 'backstage' you'll generally just be asked to stop work and move out of the way for a few minutes.
 
Who needs the government to tell me that conspiracy theorists are despicable. Just look at them at times like this.
 
Anyone know what the "remain calm" just before the explosions claim is about?
 

Back
Top Bottom