I never said we owed him anything only that we shouldn't forget that an American winning the chess championship was exponentially less likely than an American team winning the World Cup eight years ago (we have a real chance this year)![]()
Not as much as that Checkmite character.Chess makes people crazy.
I'm a victim of chess.
If Fischer were alive today, he would be foaming with rage at you for referring to him as an American. He really, really, really hated America.
No representative of my country.
You can't say that Spassky or any other Russian "defecting" or "hating Russia" makes their achievements "not Russian", and then turn around and put Fischer on a pedestal as some kind of American Hero.

You must have a poster of that commie suck up Karpov hanging over your bed.
And I bet he salutes it before bed every night, too!
I didn't want to say it -- but yeah, I agree, I bet that anti-American anti-Fischer scoundrel does give homage to the Karpov's of the world before he hits the sack. He longs for the good old days of commie chess rule.
Those days are long gone.
Sadly, at this point I honestly don't know if you are being serious or not.
Sadly, you see the world in black and white.
...says the guy accusing Checkmite of "longing for the good old days of commie chess rule."
Yes, and obviously Russia is reeling so much from that "embarrassing blow" that they still dominate the game to this day...
If Fischer were alive today, he would be foaming with rage at you for referring to him as an American. He really, really, really hated America.
No representative of my country.
Fischer was an American hero at the time and still is to me. The guy suffered from mental illness.
You were also dissing the SU chess accomplishments, essentially accusing them of continuously cheating.I represented Fischer as a hero of mine and he started the argument. I'm only finishing it.
The starving of the Ukrainians was in the 1930s, not the 1960s or 1970s. And what has that to do with their chess accomplishments? The SU poured a lot of money and effort in training chess players. The US public education system devotes a lot of time and effort to sports like baseball and American football. I don't see the difference.If you were living and aware in the early 70's you knew the Soviet Union was many things: Oppressive on political rights, oppressive to the point of starving millions of Ukranians, crazy ass oppressive for many reasons -- but what they were to me were evil chess cheats. Bobby showed them. He forfeited games and still kicked their cheating asses.
At the time of his defection, he was well past his prime and had lost interest in really playing for the top. It had no influence on the SU chess accomplishments.You're out of touch because they no longer dominate chess. Spassky had to defect
Link for that claim?and four of his advisors went to the gulags.
If he had no seconds, it was his own choice. They were well part of the game, and any GM at the time would have considered it an honor to even be asked for the position.Fischer single handedly without a single chess advisor with him crushed a well oiled chess machine. That kind of event happens less than once in a lifetime. I came home from grade school and watched the PBS coverage and was one of the first to celebrate.
Nevertheless, he was raised in that system and owed the development of his talent to it, there's no point in denying that.You don't think Gary Kasporov who dominated shortly later was a commie Russian do you. He was/is a non-Russian commie hater.
No he wasn't "mentally ill", he was just a jackass. I'm unaware of any doctor actually diagnosing Fischer with a mental disease. If you are, please post a source.
Was he ever evaluated at all? If he wasn't, this isn't a fair question.
MY bad, Fischer was a model of mental health.No he wasn't "mentally ill", he was just a jackass. I'm unaware of any doctor actually diagnosing Fischer with a mental disease. If you are, please post a source.
I accuse them of cheating in the interzonals.You were also dissing the SU chess accomplishments, essentially accusing them of continuously cheating.
I see how you can equate the twoThe starving of the Ukrainians was in the 1930s, not the 1960s or 1970s. And what has that to do with their chess accomplishments? The SU poured a lot of money and effort in training chess players. The US public education system devotes a lot of time and effort to sports like baseball and American football. I don't see the difference.
Tiamanov lost 6-0 why didn't you mention him in your commie sympathizing.Where did they cheat? Were Smyslov, Tal, Petrosian, Spassky, Karpov and Kasparov undeserving champions? Didn't they get their titles according to the book?
The US championship was internal. We had a special person who stepped aside and no international rules (which applied) were broken. You are the commie sympethizer for saying the US didn't bring the right player when it was an internal national choice. Fischer only insisted on a fair prize to the game when the commie cheaters made a good living and Fischer didn't make a penny and needed the prize money. Every professional chess player owes a debt to Fischer for demanding a fair fee. You mock Fischer for demanding what every person knows today was right. I don't know if I should even speak to you anymore for saying that. You don't get it.I find it mildly amusing that you accuse the SU of cheating, what with all the shenanigans that Fischer pulled. Hell, he didn't even have a spot in the interzonal because he skipped the US championship. And then the discussions about the place of the game, the prize money, and during the game the cameras. And then, of course, the shenanigans about the next match, which he eventually forfeited because the FIDE would not give in to all his demands.
If he wasn't, "he had a mental illness" isn't a fair claim.
And from those alleged quick draws between Soviets, both players magically got a whole point each, or what? More substantiation is needed than parrotting a wild claim from Fischer.I accuse them of cheating in the interzonals.
I see a complete lack of counterarguments.I see how you can equate the two![]()
You may have missed the word "champion". Taimanov (mind the spelling) never was. Sorry for forgetting Botvinnik, btw.Tiamanov lost 6-0 why didn't you mention him in your commie sympathizing.
Re-read my post. I didn't address whether it was legal or not. But the US championship also was the zonal tournament and if Benko had insisted, he had gone himself to the Interzonal.The US championship was internal. We had a special person who stepped aside and no international rules (which applied) were broken. You are the commie sympethizer for saying the US didn't bring the right player when it was an internal national choice.
No wonder he didn't make a penny. He hadn't been playing for 18 months. And after the Reykjavik match, he hardly played either.Fischer only insisted on a fair prize to the game when the commie cheaters made a good living and Fischer didn't make a penny and needed the prize money.
I don't mind if you respond or not; you're just foaming at the mouth anyway.Every professional chess player owes a debt to Fischer for demanding a fair fee. You mock Fischer for demanding what every person knows today was right. I don't know if I should even speak to you anymore for saying that. You don't get it.
I don't mind if you respond or not; you're just foaming at the mouth anyway.
By that standard, neither is your claim that he wasn't.
I expect nothing less from the communist side of this chess forum.