I'm talking about the hight of the floors. Which is obviously not 22cm
Whiteout knowing the thickness of the floors, you cannot konw the height.
The hight is important because, to find the contribution of the building's gravity, you have to subtract Earth's gravity, and that varies with elevation (free air gradient). So we need the approximate elevation of each floor.
No, - you
MUST KNOW the
exactly hight.
If the total height is only total 20 cm off you wouldn’t have any clear pattern, according to whether the buildings ADG is stable from top to bottom or increasing.
If you do NOT understand the difference between floor (etage) elevation, and floor (gulv) thickness, YOU are the one beyond hope (but I already knew that).
If you don’t know the difference between a cow and a scientist (or between a meter and a centimeter) you are beyond any hope.
What Bjarne is doing is that he is plotting the differential gravity floor to floor. This is not entirely silly, because his original thesis was that it would suddenly shift to an upward pull when the gravitational center of the building was passed, and that would be visible in the differential, as well.
A suddenly shift to an upward pull , - is true when the building is floating in space.
The fact that the Earth also contributes to encircle central space of the building is in no way a big surprise, but should be expected,
after a little simple thoughtfulness, - so you have no point here either, - but can only point to the cow logic consequences, - that in fact support the basic theory, rather than opposing it.
To find the actual gravity contribution of the building, floor by floor, the correct way is to subtract Earth's gravity, corrected for the fact that this diminishes as you move up wards (the free air gradient).
And it is exactly here that the world’s most stupid cow could have done pretty much better like you.
To calculate the buildings own gravity e.g; on 15th floor you
must deduct the
EXCACT FAG from the measured value.
To be able to do that you
MUST KNOW the
exact hight on that 15th floor.
But according to Hans pretty silly opinion, - this doesn’t matter, - plus or minus 2 meter doesn’t matter according to Hans. ( we speak about
deviation +/- 661 microgal ) >> Stated here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6164036&postcount=1477
I think further comments regarding this are not necessary.
Hans advice: you can only cheat the most stupid one at this forum, - and I hope you enjoy it. - So far not a single cow have been trapped by this silly cheat opinion.
I have done this, and it shows a nice slope, where you can see that the building pulls down on the upper floors, and pulls up on the lower floors, and this effect varies gradually with elevation.
A 99,9999999999 % brain damage cow will understand that if you can chose the height
at pleasure, and hence the value
you like to reduce from the buildings gravity, (without respecting the real height values) it must be because you are in a completely different dimension where one meter no longer is 1 meter. Or how shall we really understand you SIR ?.
What you cannot do is determine exactly it actually crosses zero, because we do not have the baseline gravity for the building. This is the gravity at the surface, on the spot where the building stands, but without the building. That could have been measured when the foundations were laid, but the building not yet started, but that opportunity is missed for good.
This is the most cow silly stupid I even have hear.
You have two columns of data:
- on the one side, - the measured total ADG values,
- and on the other side: the FAG values, (based on down to earth hight measurement), and based not free fantasy.
Now deduct the values “2” from “1” - and store these in a third column.
Now you can cow objective clear see the buildings own gravity from top to bottom.
Already by doing such cow brain damage simple calculation, you can easy see the prevailing creeds in no possible way can be truth, simply because you can in no way point to the fact that there are ANY NEGATIVE ADG values from floor 15th to ground floor. (compared to FAG)
You will doesn’t matter what you do (except cheating) ONLY be able to see that ADG never is negative. (compared to FAG)
Off course you can speculate whether the density of the underground beneath the building is.
But this is peanuts, and will anyway not change the pattern your cow logic simple calculation above proves.
Even if there is a (weak) extra
+/- from the underground, still the calculated gravity
“pattern” (above) is nailed.
But we shall
not expect any large contribution deviation from the underground, even a heavy foundation only affects with 20 % (density difference).
And you can see a larger ADG value at 2nd floor. ( please notice this) -
So the large downwards pull at 2nd (etc) floor can NOT come from the underground.
The buildings pull at the lower floors "should" according the prevailing creeds pulls upwards.
The buildings pull
is DOWNWARDS at ground floor Hans (!). - ( and this is the case ON ALL FLOORS, - HANS ) (!)
What really confuse you is that the old thesis have fall.
You couldn’t believe that to happen, and you still don’t believe you own eyes.
When I measured the floor thickness there was a little edge, I wanted to check the thickness further but forgot. – The floor could be between 20 and 22 cm.
+ 1 or 2 cm. is enough to give a much different “picture”.
When the floor is 21 cm,
or if there is other measurement mistake, for example that the roof at ground floor is + 30 cm higher ( I could not measure exactly because of the PVC / roof cover)
So
+ 30 cm give a stable ADG (also compared to the FAG)
If the difference
+ 60 cm (which also is possible) then we will have a accelerating ADG (not stable) .
A friend in KBH will check all this
soon.
Bjarne's next project is better in this regard, as they are actually obtaining a baseline, before the mass is placed.
Off course this will be more “accurate”
But as mentioned DOMUS VISTA already give 100% of the cow society a 100%clear pattern, - enough to know that the prevailing thesis is dead.
It is like you not only are in a unknown "distance-dimension" - but also seems to expect a goldmine beneath DOMUS VISTA. - You should then go digging (!) (?)
This shows you that Bjarne is actually reading and understanding the arguments put forth, and all his cow-speak, insults, and other obfuscations is really just a smoke-screen to buy time, in the vain hope that the next experiment will vindicate him.
I think you soon will have enough stuff to you can write a book: How it is to pee against headwind.
(There IS, of course, the possibility that the new protocol is designed by the professionals he has hired, and that Bjarne's ignorant ramblings are really a measure of his mental capacity)
Shame on you.
!
!
is a number with no units of measurement.
