So far you have only made uselss measurements, and you have not proved a single thing, so......
As people have been pointing out (and which you have ignored), your thesis is neither logical nor coherent. Your math makes no sense, and you don't understand the obvious consequences of your own ideas.
Yes, I have. Current science has observations and coherent theories to support its position. You problem is that you don't understand even the simplest concepts.
Charges in motion.
Gravity.
Gravity.
They don't.
It doesn't.
It doesn't. It is right where the force lines end.
I don't know. Neither do you.
E=MC
2.
False. I can reject your thoughts till such time as YOU prove them right.
Hans
Exactly so superficial (from A to Z) as expected.
And like if I would say the cow gives milk because it eat grass, and the car can drive because it is gasoline in the tank, and women blab la too much because they have a mouth.
To accuse sompne of being drunk while doing their work as you did is libel.
Completely crap.
First at all you cannot take my words out of its context.
And the context is: that you denied that the Sun MSP is
not found where we expected it to be, - and we don't know why. or where it really is.
If this really “should be
true” (notice the context) -
then people that seems to know better, and that have reason for claiming the opposite, -
must either be joking, lying, drunk or stupid etc..
OR those that claim that we know where the MSP is, must be joking, lying, drunk or stupid etc..
This is not libel, but a matter of simple logic / contradiction /
fact.
Simply because not both can be
true.
The truth is
NEVER libel.
The MSP
cannot both be where we expect it to be, and
not be where we expect it to be. – Simple cow logic.
But first at all, - I did not accuse, - but assumed the one or the other person to be drunk, based on:
if your information is true, - (
which I do not believe) .
Secondly to be libel, it must be either illegal or humiliating.
It is for example humiliating to compare people with animals (except off course cows, - because of cows have higher IQ than us) and it is humiliating to accused people from illegal actions. (It is not illegal to be drunk).
But If I accused someone for being drunk
and driving a car, -
this would be a different story.
To be drunk or to suspect someone to be drunk can never be libel.
Thirdly if there were good reasons to suspect a man for example driving a car, -drunk, - it would not be not be libel, because the way the man had behaved before driving the car could give me
the right to suspect him for something even if it was illegal, and even if it was not true. – Without that this is libel either.
Have you ever heard about: the freedom of speech? ?
Difference opinions are legal to any time.
You can even in public suspect a man for being a murder, - even though it is not true.
IF YOU HAVE GOOD REASON TO BELIVE SO.
I can also accuse anyone for whatever, -
so long it is true.
RC
You understanding of Jury are exactly so poor as your ability to judge the thesis I represent.
Don’t even try to teach me jury, - you could very easy demonstrate how incompetent you really are in that field (too) and make a big fool out of yourself.
--
!
