Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

[DazzaD]

No they do not, if they did the whole universe must change every time you drive your car.
.

Fine. No problem with that. If you mean the mathematical model of the universe will have different 'values' that is fine. Particles will be in different places, hence a 'different' universe. I would worry if it were otherwise.

Digest or don’t, it is your own problem if you ignore what reality is and not is.

To a certain extent I dont care about reality as you call it. The issue at hand with a lot of the questions I have posed to you, none of which you have answered, refer to the mathematical model of the world around us. In that sense whether the reality is there or not I dont care. That is a question for philosophers to sit round discussing. Us mathematicians and scientists can quite happily get on with things that demonstrably work.

 

[DazzaD]

When the creator has made reality of dreams, he must had have a problem with gravity, because how can something fall to the ground, when it all only is made of dreams? I mean I have never seen a dream falling to the ground. – This is maybe why gravity is an elastic property of space-density. And space density is then the stuff dreams (realities) are made of.

What does the creator think of the EM, Strong or Weak force? Or is gravity a special case here?

Circular reasoning?

How can it be falling to the ground if that is not actually the reality?

 

[Reality Check]

Bjarne demonstrates that he cannot count to 3

Newtonian reality is also not 3D, - the reason to that it is not exact, is only that reality is a tiny bit different for each meter away from a gravitational field you get.

That is stupidly ignorant. Newtonian reality is explictly 3D snce it is in Cartesian coordinates, i.e. (x,y,z).
You obviously cannot count to 3 .

 

[Reality Check]

No they do not, if they did the whole universe must change every time you drive your car.
...

Yes they do, if they did not then the whole universe must change every time you drive your car.
The same laws of physics descibe your car no matter how fast you drive it.

 

[Reality Check]

The box is made of dream and the content too.
...even more gibberish snipped...

Bjarne demonstrates that he cannot count to 3

Bjarne, Given an equation, how do you determine the n in nD for it?
First asked 16th January 2012 (3 days and counting!)

Bjarne: Cite your 'loads of contradictions' for the Big Bang
First asked 21st October 2011 (99 days and counting!)

 

[Bjarne]

That is stupidly ignorant. Newtonian reality is explictly 3D snce it is in Cartesian coordinates, i.e. (x,y,z).
You obviously cannot count to 3 .

Newtonian gravity is decreasing proportional with the distance square, not proportional with the cube.

 

[Bjarne]

Yes they do, if they did not then the whole universe must change every time you drive your car.
The same laws of physics descibe your car no matter how fast you drive it.

 

[Bjarne]

What does the creator think of the EM, Strong or Weak force? Or is gravity a special case here?

Circular reasoning?

How can it be falling to the ground if that is not actually the reality?

It is all a unity

 

[Bjarne]

Exactly! That is the point. In other words, as I have been saying all along: There is only one reality, but our perception of that reality can be different.

Hans this is where you went wrong
You have simply swallowed the blue pill
It is OK - that's your live, your reality.

I have come to a new understanding
30 years ago I read a book and the words,, don’t you know that morning , noon and evening is all inside of you.

I did many times think about how that possible could be understood, - but I did not understand it really.

First now when I was working with the gravity theory, and begun to research how others also in our modern time do understand that old wisdom, I begun to understand that this is actually what the basic modern science shows us, and especially the relativity theory .
But don’t worry Hans, you live your blue pill reality I live my red pill reality, and that’s fine.

 

[Bjarne]

1) Find a busy city street.

2) Wait for large aggressive looking male to walk by (generally, the more tattoos, the better).

3) Walk up behind said large aggressive looking male and direct a solid kick at the lower, rear portion of his body.

4) When he turns, tell him: "That was because you mother is so ugly".

snipped....:

I saw a film few weeks ago about Hiroshima. A old lady surveyed. She was experience terrible thing when that bomb went off, today Hiroshima is rebuild, and she was wondering, and said, - it is hard to understand that it really was happening , today it all seems so unreal for here, that all what she once saw really did happen
Many people’s tell that after terrible experiences, - that it all was so surrealistic, - many uses the words, it was like a unreal dream. - And this is what it is, - everything is only "dreams" - second world war too, - “only” a bad dream.
People was getting heard, and was dying, but this is part of the bad dream. - A 500 ton heavy train is also part of the dream. - There is a lot that makes it look real, - but the stuff everything is made off seems to be nothing but dreams.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO4GH8bmYEg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4jMiiwefAA

 

[Paul]

It is all a unity

What is?

 

[Paul]

I have come to a new understanding

If you have, it will be the first thing you have understood.

30 years ago I read a book and the words,, don’t you know that morning , noon and evening is all inside of you.

Oh, I see, the truth is hidden in random sentences in books from the 80's.

I did many times think about how that possible could be understood, - but I did not understand it really.

Any clues as to what sort of book it was? Pop-up, colouring, historical romance, children's stories?

First now when I was working with the gravity theory, and begun to research how others also in our modern time do understand that old wisdom,

Old wisdom?

I begun to understand that this is actually what the basic modern science shows us, and especially the relativity theory

Which demonstrates that you understood nothing.

I live my red pill reality, and that’s fine.

Live whatever fantasy you want, just don't pretend it is real or scientific.

 

[Paul]

I saw a film few weeks ago about Hiroshima.

And even after that you thought you would behave in a deplorable manner and diminish those experiences to advance your palpable nonsense. You are an unpleasant person.

second world war too, - “only” a bad dream.

You don't know an elderly Jewish people do you?

There is a lot that makes it look real

Like existing, that always helps in the looking real stakes.

By the way, have you considered that blind people can arrive at the same mathematical - and often physical - description of the same object as sighted people, how do they dream that?

but the stuff everything is made off seems to be nothing but dreams.

Try punching yourself in the head repeatedly while explaining to your brain that it's just a dream.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO4GH8bmYEg&feature=related

More crap.

 

[Paul]

Just to save anyone else the brainache, the video is of Deepak Chopra.

 

[Reality Check]

Bjarne, Can you understand what a distance between 2 points is

Newtonian gravity is decreasing proportional with the distance square, not proportional with the cube.

Newtonian gravity is decreasing proportional with the distance squared.
It is stupid to think that squaring this distance means that Newtonian gravity is 2D.

The radial distance r in Newtonian gravity is the distance between 3 dimensional points.
The first point is (a, b, c). This has 3 dimensions.
The second point is (x,y,z). This has 3 dimensions.
The distance between these 2 3D points is

r^2 = (x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 + (z-c)^2
​

Newtonian gravity is 3D.

 

[Reality Check]

http://www.science27.com/forum/cowstamp2.jpg

That is ironic coming from someone who cannot even count up to 3!

The simple fact that you remain ignorant of is that you can always use SR to describe the movement of objects.

Bjarne demonstrates that he cannot count to 3

Bjarne, Given an equation, how do you determine the n in nD for it?
First asked 16th January 2012 (3days and counting!)

Bjarne: Cite your 'loads of contradictions' for the Big Bang
First asked 21st October 2011 (99 days and counting!)


P.S.
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)

 

[phunk]

Newtonian gravity is decreasing proportional with the distance square, not proportional with the cube.

[qimg]http://www.science27.com/forum/cowstamp.jpg[/qimg]

Anyone with even a basic understanding of geometry should understand why the inverse square law implies three dimensions, not two.

 

[Bjarne]

Newtonian gravity is decreasing proportional with the distance squared.
It is stupid to think that squaring this distance means that Newtonian gravity is 2D.

The radial distance r in Newtonian gravity is the distance between 3 dimensional points.
The first point is (a, b, c). This has 3 dimensions.
The second point is (x,y,z). This has 3 dimensions.
The distance between these 2 3D points is

r^2 = (x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 + (z-c)^2
​

Newtonian gravity is 3D.

Gravity (ADG) decreases 4 times when distances (radius) increases 2 times.
This gives us the proportional 1:2. – Cows have known this exactly 7777352390236273053469 years (on Monday)
If the gravity decrease should have been proportional to the cube decrease it would have been a completely different story, - that reality DO NOT exist (except in RC's fantasy).
Cows have also known this wisdom exactly 7777352390236273053469 years (on Monday)

There is now way off manipulating that RC, - maybe you can cheat yourself, and the foolish parts of the world, - but not all, and not at all cows.
RC, - The offer I gave you some time ago, - 10,000 free cow logic lessons are still valid.

 

[Bjarne]

You don't know an elderly Jewish people do you?

It doesn’t matter whether you or other "looks backwards" in time to the past
What we see is images in our brain (mind), - happy or said.
And the exactly the same is the main basic for what you call reality.
That reality is indeed must stranger as you think.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Newtonian gravity is decreasing proportional with the distance square, not proportional with the cube.

http://www.science27.com/forum/cowstamp.jpg

Yes, and this is exactly because it is three dimensional. Only in a three-dimensional realm can a distance translate to an area. If it was two-dimensional, it would be decreasing proportionally to distance.

You like simple explanations, and this is really, really simple: The circumference of a circle is proportional to the radius. The surface of a sphere is proportional to the cube of the radius.

And to top it Bjarne, gravity is proportional to mass. The mass of a ball is proportional to the cube of the radius. Also Newtonian.

So, please stop this nonsense.

Hans