Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

[Daylightstar]

... Don't forget the mathematics.
...

(1m/s x 1m/s) - there = (not so much)²

 

[Daylightstar]

...
space pixies .
...

In Bjarne's adventure they are spelled like: Rspace Rpixies.

 

[Reality Check]

Mainly this;
...
http://arxivblog.com/?p=702

...http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/23865/

Mainly this: Your fantasy that the totally insane idea of RR (and 'space wind'!) can explain th he current unexplained phenomena.
Mainly this: The idiocy of citing a web page from 2009 and not researching the current position. That would show that for example the Pioneer anomaly has been solved: The Pioneer anomaly was explained in March 2011: "Pioneer Anomaly Solved By 1970s Computer Graphics Technique"

RR does not exist:

• Why particle accelerators disprove Bjarne's impossible "kinetic resistance"
  11th December 2009
• The Pioneer anomaly proves that Bjarne's "kinetic resistance" does not exist!
• Spiral galaxies prove that Bjarne's "kinetic resistance" does not exist!
• RR is useless:
  Bjarne: Show your calculations that RR is the cause of Sedna's orbit

P.S.
Bjarne: Cite your 'loads of contradictions' for the Big Bang
First asked 21st October 2011 (33 days and counting!)

 

[Bjarne]

So this. 0.006 arcseconds per year is the support for your great discovery?
Do you even have an idea what that is?
I'll tell you what it is: It is roughly equivalent to how much a moth sitting on your rear fender can sped up your car by farting.
Oh? well explain that. - Don't forget the mathematics.
Explain, coherently and in detail, how your 'theory' explains each of these phenomena.
Hans

I dont want to use time to calculate the precession Anomaly of each object because there is a lot we don’t kno, - it is tiny values, - I am busy with other things etc.
I expect such will always will emerge and also that these will be tiny.
This part do not have my attention because there are other much more significant signals which it is much easier to prove, - and then prove the theory.
Think about this, we know the AU extend with 15 cm each year (read my previous post).
Why ?
The first that strikes me is that the Sun is still pushing us away after it lost the great planet "Titanic"
Titanic was lost ´(maybe for 1 - 2-3 or 4 billion years ago) - the Sun was rotating 20 to 50 times faster as now (because of lost of several giant planet) Such always happens right after a solar system is formed.

This is all long ago and the Sun's rotation is since decreased a lot, but still the KE from the last lost planet that was scarified ; “Titanic” , - seems still to be pushing us away from the Sun.
But only a fragment of the KE from the time when Titanic demised is left.
What happen was that Titanic in its last "days" lost its entire moons; most of them smashed into either the Sun or into Titanic.
But Mercury, Venus, Earth Mars and the asteroid belt surveyed.
This is not fantasy, - you can easy imaging that some moon will surveyed when large planet is lost, and also that these off course have moons. So this speculation is plausible.
( The water is not brought to Earth, Titanic brought the Earth and the water here).

So, - long ago we was certainly pushed away several meter away from the Sun per year (ext. of the AU)
The Sun is still losing its KE due to own rotation an due to the SW.
When the last surplus of KE is used we (the Earth) will begin to approach the Sun (again). So a hot hell is waiting, but it will take a loooooong time.

It was much warmer million of years ago
Why do you think?
Take a look at this >
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X3_Fik9NU...65_Myr_Climate_Change_Rev+revised+(kopia).png

 

[Bjarne]

You couldn't calculate the orbit of a satellite even if somebody gave you all the figures.
Hans

But I can communicate with cows.
Dont underestimate that.
I have only 7 brain cell left and 2 of them is still 20% infected with mass brainwash. This is not my fail.

 

[Daylightstar]

But I can communicate with cows.
Dont underestimate that.
...

You have not actually demonstrated that.
Anyways, it doesn't matter, your problem is that you appear unable to meaningfully communicate with humans.

 

[Paul]

But I can communicate with cows.
Dont underestimate that.

Even if you weren't obviously lying, it wouldn't matter; what's wrong is that you pretend to believe what you claim the cows say to you.

This is not my fail.

I think that speaks for itself...

 

[Paul]

I dont want to use time to calculate

That's right, leave the real work to proper scientists who don't think it's beneath them to analyse data and calculate results.

I am busy with other things etc.

Like not researching, not calculating, not understanding, not listening...

I expect such will always will emerge and also that these will be tiny.

That's OK them, as long as you expect, I'm sure the universe will just reorder itself to suit your lazy, ignorant assertions.

This part do not have my attention because there are other much more significant signals which it is much easier to prove, - and then prove the theory.

How's that going?

Why ?

I don't know, why don't you make something up. Don't forget to include guesswork, wild speculation, and misuse of science.

The first that strikes me is that the Sun is still pushing us away after it lost the great planet "Titanic"

Impressive first try.

Titanic was lost ´(maybe for 1 - 2-3 or 4 billion years ago)

Because there's no difference between 1,2,3 or 4 billion.

the Sun was rotating 20 to 50 times faster as now (because of lost of several giant planet)

Ooh, excellent more theoretical planets.

Such always happens right after a solar system is formed.

So now you know how solar systems form?

This is all long ago and the Sun's rotation is since decreased a lot, but still the KE from the last lost planet that was scarified ; “Titanic” , - seems still to be pushing us away from the Sun.

Would you care to invent an explanation of how that works?

But Mercury, Venus, Earth Mars and the asteroid belt surveyed.

You're funny.

This is not fantasy, .

Right there, that's your problem.

So, - long ago we was certainly pushed away...

It would be funny, if you didn't want us to believe that you think this nonsense is real.

 

[MRC_Hans]

I dont want to use time to calculate the precession Anomaly of each object because there is a lot we don’t kno, - it is tiny values, - I am busy with other things etc.

Translation: I don't have the foggiest idea how tot calculate this stuff.

I expect such will always will emerge and also that these will be tiny.

Translation: But I hope someone will post something on the internetz that I can claim supports my idea.

This part do not have my attention because there are other much more significant signals which it is much easier to prove, - and then prove the theory.

Translation: In the meantime I will pretend you never asked and instead dream up some new nonsense.

The first that strikes me is that the Sun is still pushing us away after it lost the great planet "Titanic" *Sniiip*[/quote]

The first thing that strikes me is that you are not even trying any more.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

But I can communicate with cows.

That does explain a lot.

Dont underestimate that.

I'm afraid I find it virtually impossible to underestimate you.

I have only 7 brain cell left.

Well, it shows.

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

600 Mysteries in the Night Sky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQHuF3BGZzw

Exploding stars from a previous Universe?
When all stars explode at almost the same time, the Universe would not be 100 % transparent.

 

[MRC_Hans]

600 Mysteries in the Night Sky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQHuF3BGZzw

Yes, interesting. But hardly surprising. This is something we recently started exploring, and the whole purpose of exploration is to find things we didn't know about.

Exploding stars from a previous Universe?

No.

When all stars explode at almost the same time, the Universe would not be 100 % transparent.

Why?

Hans

 

[Paul]

Exploding stars from a previous Universe?

"Of course we're hoping for something really exotic like dark matter, but we have to look first at all the other options," says Thompson. "Fermi is an ongoing mission. We'll continue to search for answers to these puzzles and perhaps turn up even more surprises."

That's what real scientist do.

When all stars explode at almost the same time, the Universe would not be 100 % transparent.

In science, first thought best thought doesn't always apply.

 

[Paul]

While Bjarne's away with the space fairies, I'm intrigued by the idea that dark matter might shine in gamma rays.

 

[Bjarne]

Did we misunderstood what BigBang really was ?
http://earthsky.org/space/gamma-ray-burst-illuminates-new-mystery-in-early-galaxies

 

[Paul]

Did we misunderstood what BigBang really was ?

Did you even attempt to understand the article?

 

[Bjarne]

Why?

Hans

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/041029a.html

 

[Paul]

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/041029a.html

Another link you haven't properly read or understood.

The primary reason that the reionized universe is transparent is that because of the expansion of the universe the intergalactic medium (IGM) is much less dense on average than the plasma before recombination... ...so there just aren't very many electrons to scatter light from distant galaxies and quasars.

 

[MRC_Hans]

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/041029a.html

And?

 

[Bjarne]

And?

How transparent (for EM waves) do you think gas clouds left by a supernova are ?
Can visible light penetrate?
Can gamma penetrate?
How would temperature be?
I cannot see the big basic difference from a Bitgbang, except BB was bigger, can you ?