Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
Bjarne, pray tell: What is the difference between lost speed and ... deceleration?
Hans
Why not ask what the difference is between linier and not linear.
RR is not linear resistance.
Bjarne, pray tell: What is the difference between lost speed and ... deceleration?
Hans
OK, I think I understand what Bjarne is trying to claim. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, it is wrong.
Let us say the sun would suddenly vanish.
So for some 8 minutes, we would notice nothing on Earth, then the sun would wink out, and a gravity wave would hit us.
This is a BIG problem, without imagination... no understanding, - all the brian can understand is “pictures” (imagination).How exactly we would sense that gravity wave, I'm not sure,
No this is wrong, the problem is that;but after it had passed, Earth would no longer 'feel' the gravity of the sun, so it would proceed at a straight line into space, (snipped).
Why not ask what the difference is between linier and not linear.
RR is not linear resistance.
... all the brian can understand is “pictures” (imagination).
Also even though these picture are numbers.
...
...
imagination
I mean if you really want to understand something.
...
Imagination is all you have, plenty of it. And you still don't understand anything...
... Waves
... wave ... wave ...
... imagination ...
It is not a BIG problem - it is an extemely SMALL problem.This is a BIG problem, without imagination... no understanding, - all the brian can understand is “pictures” (imagination).
Also even though these picture are numbers.
That is right for once: A fantasy is nothing and so can never be 'linear resistance;:Why not ask what the difference is between linier and not linear.
RR is not linear resistance.
What does this gibberish mean?I have found the right found you could not after asking you plenty times.
Wait a minute, if gravitation effects space itself in a resilient manner there would be a huge through following our solar system through space.
And nobody noticed?
More Advanced Gibber Science
With your "model" a laboratory with a gravity meter would not be able to measure if the snow on the roof had been removed or not.And this mean that gravity will still be there..... towards the Sun, towards the centre of a Universe, and towards a grain of sand, - billion of years after the objetcs are gone.
Bjarne,
Your explanation of gravity does not make sense.
With your "model" a laboratory with a gravity meter would not be able to measure if the snow on the roof had been removed or not.
And there is still the issue of the solar system moving through space with no noticeable gravitational residue left behind.