Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bjarne, not all about the universe is known, more questions will arise in the future.

But clearly, you will not be part of finding the answers. But that's okay, there will be others who can or at least make a valid effort.
 
Dark flow was discovered in 2008 and not confirmed yet.
No. The clusters flow - they do not orbit. Even intellegent cows know this. I suggest you ask your pet cow to explain this to you.

Really!
This sounds almost like an ant that would claim that the Earth not is round.
 
13 billion yeaers ago "something" was not as we expect it to be

http://www.space.com/2132-flash-beginning-time-reveals-strange-event.html

More small craks in our "understanding"

More
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hst_img_20090106.html

Big expansions in our knowledge and understanding of the universe. This is science at work.
  1. The formation of black holes in the early universe may not be a straight forward supernova explosion and collapse as previously thought. The massive size of Population III stars is a possible cause.
  2. SCP 06F6 is an observation of a possible new type of stellar event, e.g. the collision of a white dwarf with a black hole.
 
Last edited:
Really!
This sounds almost like an ant that would claim that the Earth not is round.
Really!
An ant could claim that the world is not round.
It is lucky that I am not an ant and can read English and understand what I read.
Bjarne: The word flow is different from the word orbit. They mean different things.

Dark flow
Dark flow is an astrophysical term describing a peculiar velocity of galaxy clusters. The actual measured velocity is the sum of the velocity predicted by Hubble's Law plus a small and unexplained (or dark) velocity flowing in a common direction.
According to standard cosmological models, the motion of galaxy clusters with respect to the cosmic microwave background should be randomly distributed in all directions. However, analyzing the three-year WMAP data using the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, the authors of the study found evidence of a "surprisingly coherent" 600–1000 km/s[1] flow of clusters toward a 20-degree patch of sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela.
...
NASA's Goddard Space Center considered that this could be the effect of a sibling universe or a region of space-time fundamentally different from the observable universe. Data on more than 1,000 galaxy clusters have been measured, including some as distant as 3 billion light-years. Alexander Kashlinsky claims these measurements show the universe's steady flow is clearly not a statistical fluke. Kashlinsky said: "At this point we don't have enough information to see what it is, or to constrain it. We can only say with certainty that somewhere very far away the world is very different than what we see locally. Whether it's 'another universe' or a different fabric of space-time we don't know."[8]
 
Last edited:
No, of course not there are excellent works on the subject.
Here is one of the more easily assessable.

I didn't notice anything about Geodesics in your reference.

An alternate view is that time is gravity. If you are orbiting a mass in a tracked bulldozer, it is like the tread on the inside is going slower than the track on the outside. So you keep turning to the inside.

Time slows down as you get closer to the mass.
 
I didn't notice anything about Geodesics in your reference.

An alternate view is that time is gravity. If you are orbiting a mass in a tracked bulldozer, it is like the tread on the inside is going slower than the track on the outside. So you keep turning to the inside.

Time slows down as you get closer to the mass.
The real view is that most of your post is gibberish.
However: Geodesic
 
Dark flow was discovered in 2008 and not confirmed yet.
No. The clusters flow - they do not orbit. Even intellegent cows know this. I suggest you ask your pet cow to explain this to you.

Moooving On. Does the flow seem to be away from these holes? Or are the holes unrelated to the flow?
 
You have something against beings from Gibber?
I have something against people writing gibberish. It makes them seem stupid which is a bad thing. But if you want people to think that you are some kind of random text writing robot rather than a real person then feel free to continue :rolleyes:.
 
I have something against people writing gibberish. It makes them seem stupid which is a bad thing. But if you want people to think that you are some kind of random text writing robot rather than a real person then feel free to continue :rolleyes:.

Actually I was trying to use a more common experience to present an analogy. I am more of a Faraday than a Maxwell. I tend to follow an older and somewhat disparaged method of thinking.

Maybe that is why physics is such a mess, with undetectable "Dark Matter" hiding under the bed.

All you Maxwell, pure mathematical types, are terrible at making discoveries.

But you are damned good, at tying all the loose ends, into knots.
 
Last edited:
Wrong: Dark matter has been detected (see my signature).
It has just not been detected (yet) in experiments.

A contradiction between observation and theory that leads to the conclusion that matter which hasn't been detectable in labs, exists in massive quantities in the universe. The dinosaurs are not gone, they are just hiding.

If a lot of resources, time, and money, hadn't already been spent on looking for "Dark Matter" I would let it lay, but the time for ridicule is now here.

"Dark Matter" sounds a lot like like many of the commonly believed dead ends, that has hung up science in the past.
 
Really!
An ant could claim that the world is not round.
It is lucky that I am not an ant and can read English and understand what I read.
Bjarne: The word flow is different from the word orbit. They mean different things.
Dark flow

Dear the universe is so huge you probably can see that Flow / Motion is not as expected, - but of course too big that you or an ant can see the orbit.

The fact that you don't see the orbit doesn’t mean it is not there.

Nothing comes from nothing, also not the "flow" - all you (like usual) have to explain it is; fantasy.

I have a coherent theory that predicts that excactly must happen, as well as I predict we will disovover a lot more from such "flow" of clusters in orbit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom