Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

[MRC_Hans]

How about we create a new 'unit' called the Bjarne (short version Bj) which is basically meters per meter or seconds per second or even cows per cow. This could be assigned to any number without changing it in any real way, so he could assign it to any unit-less number without causing problems. And it might even flatter/please/shock him enough that he stops talking via his underpants.

I'm afraid Bjarne has already tried something like that:

The KE and mass increase happens because of relativistic resistance, so soon there is no force pushing an object forward, - deceleration will take place, like shown by the Lorenzen equation.

The Lorenzen equation, indeed!
(Bjarne's last name is Lorenzen)

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

- And this:



Only one little irritating problem about that : This assumption is wrong. Cows may come out of the corners, but space doesn't.

But, that's what you get when you insist on equating astrophysics with cattle.

Hans

This is a contradiction Hans.
Cows are made of space.
So a cow are in fact nothing but absorbed space, (you know that too doesn’t you ? )
Cows and therefore absorbed cow-space will certainly resist being bended up in a corner.

Bjarne claims to have made a discovery that would be sure to earn him a Nobel and a place in history right beside Einstein and Bohr, but .... unfortunately he is busy this summer.

Yes busy Hans, rebuilding house we just bought.
But well not more busy than I also can spend some time here to get you into the corner, the cow out, and also tell you I have also time to search a >>

Copy paste ;;

Astrophysicist & Programmer Wanted
The job is to program and calculate the orbit of the Moon to be able to compare the data with the data from the Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment.
The reason for this is that a new theory predict that the Moon do have an undiscovered orbit anomaly.
The new theory claims that the Moon during the half of its Perigee Precession period (4½ year / 54 orbits) is approaching the Earth more as expected ( total about 150 meter during 4 ½ year) and that the anomaly gradually cancelling out the rest (the following 4 ½ year) of the precession period .
This have never been discovered because there have never been reason to be suspicion, and hence also not to research it.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Astrophysicist & Programmer Wanted
The job is to program and calculate the orbit of the Moon to be able to compare the data with the data from the Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment.
The reason for this is that a new theory predict that the Moon do have an undiscovered orbit anomaly.
The new theory claims that the Moon during the half of its Perigee Precession period (4½ year / 54 orbits) is approaching the Earth more as expected ( total about 150 meter during 4 ½ year) and that the anomaly gradually cancelling out the rest (the following 4 ½ year) of the precession period .
This have never been discovered because there have never been reason to be suspicion, and hence also not to research it.

Good luck with that. The data you need is here:

http://physics.ucsd.edu/~tmurphy/apollo/norm_pts.html

Have fun!

Hans

 

[Reality Check]

Astrophysicist & Programmer Wanted
...
This have never been discovered because there have never been reason to be suspicion, and hence also not to research it.

How idiotic and ignorant.
It has been researched and not found.
You cited the paper that researched this very subject and found no such effect:
On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon
This found:

A recent analysis of a Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data record spanning 38.7 yr revealed an anomalous increase of the eccentricity of the lunar orbit amounting to de/dt_meas = (9 +/- 3) 10^-12 yr^-1.

And then ther ei the idiocy of

 

[Bjarne]

How idiotic and ignorant.
It has been researched and not found.
You cited the paper that researched this very subject and found no such effect:
On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon
This found:

And then ther ei the idiocy of

Why have you not long ago bought a cow?
If you did you would not wrote something so crank stupid, idiotic and ignorant as you just did.
Now go and buy that cow, and you will see that if you measure the length and the height of the cow in 30 years, you will see that the cow grow 5 mm longer every year as expected according to cow science. We will refer to that as; the well known cow eccentricity anomaly.

This theory predict that the teeth and the intestinal canal of your cow every year (during a 4½ period) is "pushed" a little bit backwards into the month of the cow, and in the following 4½ years period cancelling out. We will refer to this as the cow perigee/apogee anomaly.

BUT, - NOW be a little awake, the cows perigee/apogee anomaly does not NOT cause a proportional length grow of the Cow.

Maybe this analogy is too difficult for you.

Do you se the >>>>>>>>> A and B ?

Now imaging a cow would jump between position A and B

This doesn’t mean that the cow is longer at position B as it si in position A
Even though the cow is jumping all the time, it is at no position longer as before.
Was that easier to understand this analogy?

So even if you every day would measure the length of you new cow and you would now exactly how much the length and the height and the width and the teats are growing, this aspect of cow-science must not be mixed with the aspect of what happen with you cow when the cow jumps from A to B.

So just keep things simple and separated and cow science and the astronomy are really not so idiotic ignorant difficult as you believe.

Does that make sense?

Or do you still believe that cow science is idiotic, ignorant, crackpot, liars crank science misk mask.

I think steep 1 is really to understand cow science perfectly, so soon you are ready you will also understand that no one have ever measured if Perigee / Apogee happens exactly at that distance it "should"
Such calculation does not exist because no one has ever suspected any anomaly, exactly as no one has ever suspected that cows in the night jumps between position A and B.

 

[Reality Check]

Why have you not long ago bought a cow?
...snipped yet another cow fetish rant....

The facts remain that your fantasy has been not found.
You cited the paper that researched this very subject and found no such effect:
On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon

 

[Bjarne]

The facts remain that your fantasy has been not found.
You cited the paper that researched this very subject and found no such effect:
On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon

This shows that we today exactly know how much the orbit is increasing, as well the proportionals between the semi majors and minor axis.

The perigee / apogee anomaly is not a extension anomaly..

 

[Little 10 Toes]

If it does show "proof" to your "claims", please cite where in the paper.

 

[Reality Check]

The perigee / apogee anomaly is not a extension anomaly.

On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon shows that the orbit of the Moon is very well known.

The perigee / apogee anomaly does not exist.
You have presented no actual calculation for this. Since you show ignorance of the basics of science and mathematics is is clear that you are incapable of doing that calculation correctly.

And the killer point is that this anomoly is based on your delusion of RR:

Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)
First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no !
​

Two years, 7 months and counting!

 

[Bjarne]

On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon shows that the orbit of the Moon is very well known.

Only the size and eccentricity of the orbit is well know.

The perigee / apogee anomaly does not exist.
You have presented no actual calculation for this.

http://www.science27.com/english/IrregularMoonsNew.html

 

[Reality Check]

Only the size and eccentricity of the orbit is well know.

Wrong as usual: Orbit of the Moon, Lunar precession

http://www.science27.com/english/IrregularMoonsNew.html

You use the idioicy of RR:

Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)
First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no !
​

Two years, 8 months and counting!

That has been experimentally debunked:

• Experimental proof that Bjarne "kinetic resistance" is wrong
  First asked 2 November 2009
• Why particle accelerators disprove Bjarne's impossible "kinetic resistance" (the above post expanded).

and the easy question that you still cannot answer:
Why does relativistic mass have the units of mass
First asked 23 November 2009

From The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)
this anomoly is based on your delusion of RR:

Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)
First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no !
​

Two years, 7 months and counting!
__________________

 

[Daylightstar]

...
http://www.science27.com/english/IrregularMoonsNew.html

↓

Average deceleration speed per ½ orbit. due to RR
1,209,600 s. * 5,6 * 10-12 m/s = 0.000003387 m/s.
..................2

5.6 * 60³ = 1,209,600 ...
Could you walk us through your calculation and explain what the numbers mean?

 

[Reality Check]

Average deceleration speed per ½ orbit. due to RR
1,209,600 s. * 5,6 * 10-12 m/s = 0.000003387 m/s.

5.6 * 60³ = 1,209,600 ...
Could you walk us through your calculation and explain what the numbers mean?

Bjarne: Also include the units of measurement in your calculation, e.g. the Lorentz factor is a number so that RR is a number (not an acceleration).

And treat the units correctly - that snippet suggests that seconds multiplies by meters per second = meters per seconds which is obviously wrong.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Bjarne: Also include the units of measurement in your calculation, e.g. the Lorentz factor is a number so that RR is a number (not an acceleration).

And treat the units correctly - that snippet suggests that seconds multiplies by meters per second = meters per seconds which is obviously wrong.

Hellooo, everybody: Bjarne simply makes stuff up as he goes. There IS no sense to it. Like any 9 year old, he can plug numbers into a calculator, but he doesn't know what they mean, and he has no idea where they are taking him.

- And I don't really think he cares. He "knows" he is the smartest person on the planet, and whatever he claims is per definition right.

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

Hellooo, everybody: Bjarne simply makes stuff up as he goes

No no no
As I told
We have bought a old farm.
Now we are busy to rebuild it.
So soon we can have have a dog and som cats, and properly also some cows.
I will be back....

 

[MRC_Hans]

No no no
As I told
We have bought a old farm.
Now we are busy to rebuild it.
So soon we can have have a dog and som cats, and properly also some cows.
I will be back....

That's good, Bjarne! You need to spend more time with real life stuff, and with your family. Sell your computer and forget about all this nonsense!

Cows, good! Of course, you may then find out that they are not as smart as you thought.

Have a nice summer.

Hans

 

[Complexity]

Why have you not long ago bought a cow?
If you did you would not wrote something so crank stupid, idiotic and ignorant as you just did.
Now go and buy that cow, and you will see that if you measure the length and the height of the cow in 30 years, you will see that the cow grow 5 mm longer every year as expected according to cow science. We will refer to that as; the well known cow eccentricity anomaly.

This theory predict that the teeth and the intestinal canal of your cow every year (during a 4½ period) is "pushed" a little bit backwards into the month of the cow, and in the following 4½ years period cancelling out. We will refer to this as the cow perigee/apogee anomaly.

BUT, - NOW be a little awake, the cows perigee/apogee anomaly does not NOT cause a proportional length grow of the Cow.

Maybe this analogy is too difficult for you.

Do you se the >>>>>>>>> A and B ?

Now imaging a cow would jump between position A and B

This doesn’t mean that the cow is longer at position B as it si in position A
Even though the cow is jumping all the time, it is at no position longer as before.
Was that easier to understand this analogy?

So even if you every day would measure the length of you new cow and you would now exactly how much the length and the height and the width and the teats are growing, this aspect of cow-science must not be mixed with the aspect of what happen with you cow when the cow jumps from A to B.

So just keep things simple and separated and cow science and the astronomy are really not so idiotic ignorant difficult as you believe.

Does that make sense?

Or do you still believe that cow science is idiotic, ignorant, crackpot, liars crank science misk mask.

I go away for about a year, come back, and bjarne is still excited about cows and his unique style of thinking.

I'm awestruck and somewhat afraid.

 

[MRC_Hans]

I go away for about a year, come back, and bjarne is still excited about cows and his unique style of thinking.

I'm awestruck and somewhat afraid.

Well, he's out in the good fresh air, doing sensible work (repairing a house they've bought). Let's hope it does him good.

.... Hopefully he is better with his hands than with his head.

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

I go away for about a year, come back, and bjarne is still excited about cows and his unique style of thinking.

I'm awestruck and somewhat afraid.

Right now we are replacing an old wood construction (for the roof) .
The walls of the building was before carrying that construction, and is now replaced with a steel construction.

Cows instinctively and intuitive knows that the foundation is very important.
If the foundation is too weak the new construction can sink so soon the roof begins to carry snow.

Cows also know that if the foundation of our picture of the world is build on a much too weak foundation, but also that it is born to sink, so soon just a simple stupid heavy cows begins to ask even stupid questions.

For examples these questions;

1. We know that energy cannot disappear, it MUST be converted to a different kind of energy; - So how can photon energy disappear? (Cosmological redshift) - what happens to the energy that within the prevailing framework must be lost ?
2. We have never really measured that distances really are expending, due to the so-called; - Expanding Universe (for example between the Moon/Earth/ Sun) why not?

Even a brain dead cow with the head full of concrete would not be asking such question and expect turbo fantasy, or creeds, - for acceptable answers.
BUT only accept objective FACTS.

I know there are a lot of (naive) humans here on the planet that not agrees with mother cow and also that there are many “guessing-factories” here on Earth, (but this have not much with objective science to do, - I belive).

All what we for certain can say is; - that the whole foundation whereon science is build; the so called; expanding Universe, is so dangerous weak, that there can be no doubt that even a heavy smoker (smoking 350 cigarettes per day) would be able to smell the stench of rotten rubbish, inside that foundation.

And it gets worse. We have no idea why the so called alleged expanding Universe “should” be accelerating (“so called; “Dark Energy”.)

We can as an analogy say that the “foundation” whereon all science now is build, is not only (indeed) in conflict with science itself, - it is also apparently cracking, and even with increasing speed.

The foundation we are speaking about is as I expect everyone should have discovered is; …. SPACE,….. - or to be more exact, - the property of space.
Notice I did not wrote; “properties”, but only “property”. (because there are / is in fact only one property…..witch mean; a flexible space, - nothing more than that. )

Now add to the sick expanding universe idea, that we also not any have knowledge of; the cause of gravity, and also not about the cause of; so called Dark Matter.

If we allow us self (just for few minutes) to keep all the so-called “properties” of space, (dark energy, dark matter and the cause of gravity) - within a framework that can be comprehended only by general relativity, - the self created mysteries, such as dark matter and dark energy (as well as the cause of gravity) will almost automatically melt together, - to a simple flexible space, - not in conflict with anything.

The only “problem” left is that at the time BigBang went of, - gravity must have been huge. Science is in fact already able to answer how that was possible; - the answer is; huge speed of matter just before BigBang.

Heavy Cows instinctively and intuitive knows, that a such new foundation is safe, - but cows also knows that the prevailing idea that the Universe really expands, - only is an optical illusion, - but also that general relativity is able to easy kill that illusion instantly, - together and at the same time when so called dark matter and dark energy is melted into a deadly mix whereby the new stuff that comes out is ; a simple flexible space, ….. and nothing more than that.

Left is only to say mmuuuuhh muuuhhh mmu mmmmuhh muuh mmoo muu .
This mean; it is so simple. (But unfortunately no more business for the entertainment industry to do, and this is properly the biggest problem.)

 

[Complexity]

I see, bjarne, that you did not take my advice and immerse yourself in some good books on science. What a pity.

I truly thought that I had persuaded you that cows are not the measure of all things.

You are aware, no doubt, that not a single cow appears in any episode of the Flintstones.

This raises many questions, but I only have time for one: Why are you only interested in the female variety of cattle? What about the boys? Speaking as a gay man, this is inexcusable behavior on your part.

Are you living in an EU country? Are you aware of what the laws are regarding this sort of thing?