Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

[Reality Check]

If this really is what GR predict there is no way GR can explain the Mercury Perihelion Precession Anomaly.. Because if distances (the meter stick) is increasing its relative length with the same rate as time ticks slower, the anomaly could not happen.

MCR_Hans does not have to answer this: You are wrong. The explanation of the Mercury Perihelion Precession Anomaly in GR has nothing to do with time dilation or length contraction.

Now me and mother cow can see you must speak about SR – this has nothing with Mercury Perihelion Precession Anomaly to do, - why do you then mention it ?

Now me and your mother cow can see that you are unable to read.

Because MASS does not change. In orbital mechanics, both velocity and distance (=spacetime) AND mass are part of the equation. Simply put, the relationship between mass and spacetime changes, and this is the explanation for the Mercury Perihelion Precession Anomaly.

is not about SR.

Now you say ; velocity and distance = spacetime, (so far I have understood you )..
So far I have understood you before; only mass / gravity are responsible for GR / space-time (and muuh-time) . So when will you make up your mind.

MRC_Hans is a bit wrong: velocity and distance happen within space-time.
In other words: The geometry of GR has includes a definition of distance. Objects that move, move in space-time.

In GR, it is the stress-energy tensor (often called the stress-energy-momomentum tensor) that is responsible for the curvature of space-time and so gravity.

 

[Little 10 Toes]

I know that you are too dumb to understand this without cow noises
but

General relativity is written in precise mathematical language. That includes

• everything happens in space-time (space and time cannot be seperated)

Exactly and this is why it would be more correct to rename the muuuhh expression to > muuuuhh-time.

Bjarne, if you are in agreement that space and time cannot be separated, why do you continue that you can?

Why do you have such a cow fetish?​

 

[Paulhoff]

He is only using you guys to do his leg work.

Paul

 

[Paul]

I wouldn't mind so much if he could put one foot in front of the other without falling over.

 

[Bjarne]

Bjarne, if you are in agreement that space and time cannot be separated, why do you continue that you can?

Why do you ?
Have you ever hear NASA have launched a space prove into space or into space-time ?

OFF COURSE time is inseparable connected to space as well as muuhh also is inseparable connected to time.
Therefore the correct expression can only be; muuuuh-time

Short muuhh-time, will then be mu-time,
and long muuhh-time will then be mmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhh-time

But still I think it would be a god idea to allow cows only to express them self as muuuuh, isolated from the time (muuuuhh-time) expression.

If you, hans and RC allow it, it could for example be allowed to research the cause of the muuuuhhh and ignore time.
In the same way it should be allowed to research the cause of space deformation for example the fact that space do have a stretching property, without it is necessary all the time to mention; - time.

MRC_Hans is a bit wrong: velocity and distance happen within space-time.
In other words: The geometry of GR has includes a definition of distance. Objects that move, move in space-time.

In GR, it is the stress-energy tensor (often called the stress-energy-momomentum tensor) that is responsible for the curvature of space-time and so gravity.

RC
And what about the quote below; , do you believe Hans in this case is correct ?

Bjarne
I wonder, - you do now admit to agree to that that time and distances are always equal proportional connected (in GR),
Hans
I do not 'now admit'. It is so, and it has always been so.

 

[Paul]

Why do you ?
Have you ever hear NASA have launched a space prove into space or into space-time... cowphilia snipped

space 1.. A property of the universe that enables physical phenomena to be extended into three mutually perpendicular directions. In Newtonian physics, space, time, and matter are treated as quite separate entities. In Einsteinian physics, space and time are combined into a four-dimensional continuum (see space–time) and in the general theory of relativity matter is regarded as having an effect on space, causing it to curve.
A Dictionary of Physics. Ed. John Daintith. Oxford University Press, 2009. Oxford Reference Online.​

time A dimension that enables two otherwise identical events that occur at the same point in space to be distinguished (see space–time). The interval between two such events forms the basis of time measurement. For general purposes, the earth's rotation on its axis provides the units of the clock (see day) and the earth's orbit round the sun (see year) provides the units of the calendar. For scientific purposes, intervals of time are now defined in terms of the frequency of a specified electromagnetic radiation (see second). See also time dilation; time reversal.

In physics, since the publication of the special theory of relativity in 1905, Einstein has frequently been said to have abandoned the concept of absolute time. In this context absolute time is taken to mean ‘time that flows equably and independently of the state of motion of the observer’. Time dilation effects and the collapse of absolute simultaneity mean that absolute time in this sense cannot be applied to the measurement of an interval of time.
A Dictionary of Physics. Ed. John Daintith. Oxford University Press, 2009.

spacetime A four-dimensional description of the Universe in which the position of an object is specified by three coordinates in space and one in time. According to the theory of special relativity, there is no absolute time which can be measured independently of the observer, so events that are simultaneous as seen by one observer occur at different times when seen from a different place. Time must therefore be measured in a relative manner, as are positions in three-dimensional (Euclidean) space, and this is achieved through the concept of spacetime. The trajectory of an object in spacetime is called its world line. General relativity relates the curvature of spacetime to the positions and motions of particles of matter.
A Dictionary of Astronomy. Ian Ridpath. Oxford University Press, 2007.

 

[Little 10 Toes]

Bjarne, if you are in agreement that space and time cannot be separated, why do you continue that you can?

Why do you have such a cow fetish?

Why do you ?

My question is to you about your beliefs or lack of beliefs, not about what I believe.

Have you ever hear NASA have launched a space prove into space or into space-time ?

Yes. Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Voyager 2, and Voyager 1.

OFF COURSE time is inseparable connected to space as well as muuhh also is inseparable connected to time.
Therefore the correct expression can only be; muuuuh-time

The rest of your incomprehensible cow-filled post is snipped.

Why aren't you answering the first question?

 

[MRC_Hans]

I have finished trying to offer Bjarne simplified explanations at cow level. He just deilberately misinterprets and distorts answers. I think what really keep Bjarne here is that he has a chance to insoult his betters. I expect that when he tried that in the real world, he got into trouble.

Still, since he has descended into total nonsesne, now, I guess we're close to ignore time.

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

I have finished trying to offer Bjarne simplified explanations at cow level. He just deilberately misinterprets and distorts answers.

I think you and RC would share the gold medal and i only would get silver

 

[Little 10 Toes]

Bjarne, if you are in agreement that space and time cannot be separated, why do you continue (to believe) that you can (separate them)?

 

[Reality Check]

RC
And what about the quote below; , do you believe Hans in this case is correct ?

Bjarne,
Yes.
GR is built on spacetime so time and distances are always connected.

The "equal proportional" part of your quote is wrong. Things can be equal. They can be proportional. They cannot be both. Or if you mean that the same thing happens to them, that is islo wrong.

 

[Bjarne]

Or if you mean that the same thing happens to them, that is islo wrong.

I mean that always when time ticks slower (GR), - let say 1%, the distances must be 1% larger.
This is the key to a coherence Universe.
Is the expression for that not; equal proportional ?

 

[Little 10 Toes]

So if a time increases by 1hr, distance increases by 1mm then?

 

[Reality Check]

I mean that always when time ticks slower (GR), - let say 1%, the distances must be 1% larger.
This is the key to a coherence Universe.
Is the expression for that not; equal proportional ?

Then you are still wrong.

Take the Schwarzschild metric as an example

N.B. r is the radial coordinate (circumference of a circle centered on the star divided by 2*pi) in meters. The curvature introduced by the mass means that this is not the distance from the origin.

It has Gravitation time dilation of

Lengths in the Schwarzschild solution are very complex. You have to integrate over the terms with r in them in the above metric. The resulting equation looks nothing like the tie dilation equation (lots of natural logarithms)

 

[Bjarne]

Then you are still wrong.

Take the Schwarzschild metric as an example

N.B. r is the radial coordinate (circumference of a circle centered on the star divided by 2*pi) in meters. The curvature introduced by the mass means that this is not the distance from the origin.

It has Gravitation time dilation of

Lengths in the Schwarzschild solution are very complex. You have to integrate over the terms with r in them in the above metric. The resulting equation looks nothing like the tie dilation equation (lots of natural logarithms)

Why was the Schwarzschild solution invented?
To solve which problem?
Remember you must explain it so that you grandmother can understand it

 

[Reality Check]

Why was the Schwarzschild solution invented?
To solve which problem?
Remember you must explain it so that you grandmother can understand it

Your grandmother will understand

1. How to click on a link Schwarzschild solution (which you obviously cannot).
2. That the Schwarzschild solution is for a synmetrical massive body.

Your grandmother should also be able to read equation 8 in this prepriint and see the distance equation in the Schwarzschild solution is very different from time dilation equation.

 

[Bjarne]

So if a time increases by 1hr, distance increases by 1mm then?

Proportional calculation / percent-wise
If time tick 1% slower that would affect 1% of the second/ minute / hour, and also 1% relative longer distance to the mm / cm / dm / meter etc ...

I am pretty sure that if Einstein have got the thought the dark matter, dark energy and the cause of gravity = a trinity, - then he would have come to few different conclusions.

It is true to say that both he and everyone else have been working in absolute darkness. If the trinity is correct that is the exact opposite, - absolute light.

I am not minded to go through all this math and details.
This what is left of my right brian can provide an overall coherence picture,- others can then do the relative few necessary changing’s that would require.'

How would the details then look like ?
Some of math necessary to that new framework I can and will do myself, for example show that RAM can explain the Mercury Perihelion anomaly (43 arc seconds) + put the Milankowich 100.000 cycle into the correct perspective.
But I am too old to start a university education to learn the entire math that more or less would be effected.
I can deliver a picture of the Universe without contradictions, without strange mysteries, without strange theories that on the one hand "must” be true, - but on the other hand no one really understand.
For example on the one hand we calculate mass increase due to speed, and on the other hand “we” deny it is real.
There are many such examples, where we have learn the math by heard (without critical questions) - and "we" did not try really understand it, - such is to my opinion not beautiful science, but screams to heaven for full and true understanding, - at least better as the case is now.

 

[Reality Check]

Are you lying about your equation uniting gravity and the string force,Bjarne

Proportional calculation / percent-wise
If time tick 1% slower that would affect 1% of the second/ minute / hour, and also 1% relative longer distance to the mm / cm / dm / meter etc ...

But as already mentioned - you are wrong for GR.

In SR the Lorentz factor is the same for time dilation and length contraction. But you have the delusion that the Lorentz factor has the units of acceleration so you obviously have no idea about SR
Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)
First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no ! .

P.S.
Bjarne, show us "the equation hat unite gravity and the strong force"
Asked on 16 March 2011 (6 days and counting)

 

[Bjarne]

Are you lying about your equation uniting gravity and the string force,Bjarne

I am not.
Start to think about 2 facts
Fact 1.
The cause of gravity and the cause of the strong force is a unity, so you do not need to unite these. It is done not by mother cow but by mother nature.
Fact 2
We have not units for; the amount of space matter absorbs / and one day again is released.
We need that...
For example we could say 1 kilo matter absorbs 1 unit space, we could call that 1 KG = 1 Mu absorbed space.
Now what is 1 kg mass
Well it is
Mc² + M*Mu
Which mean the energy release we are used to (EM-waves) which cause can be explained with the billion of interactions processes that 1 KG mass releases, - that is broken / interrupted / separated small pieces of contracted space "waves" - if you prefer...
+
The ""energy"" release of space (M*Mu)
And that it.
No I am not joking, I am serious.
You was there when it happen.
There is no matter as such, - only space and space that play with itself. - Therefore the outcome of the equation is just THAT, and NO particles or what so ever..

 

[Reality Check]

I am not.
..gibberish..

Yes you are because there was no equation in that gibberish:
Bjarne, show us "the equation hat unite gravity and the strong force"
Asked on 16 March 2011 (6 days and counting)