You said it, yes, but you are wrong. It is not equal to a pin-prick, because Earht's mass is very much larger. The gravity changes in a 3km borehole, and it changes enough to show if the law of gravity is faulty. It isn't.
And that include the weight of the inner iron part of the Earth, that you only can estimate,
based on a wrong thesis...
Steel ball?? What are you babling about??
What I just wrote above, - The inner iron core...
My claim (and that of Newtonian Law of Gravity):
The mass of the building will influence the experienced gravity, so that the gradient inside the building will differ from the free air gradient (FAG) in the following way:
1) At the top of the building, the entire mass of the building will pull down, and thus add to the FAG.
2) At the bottom of the building, the entire mass of the building will pull up, and thus subtract from the FAG.
3) Between these points, the contribution from the building will gradually change, passing zero in the building's center of gravity (COG).
This is nothing but a dead thesis.
4) The total contribution of the building depends on its mass, which is not known, but based on earlier calculations made in this thread, we can expect between 0.3 and 1 mGal.
No, you shall not expect more that 15 µgal at GF...
The estimation aome time I did before was not correct either .
It is VERY important to understand; - the more a body deviate from a ball shape, the weaker the ADG you’ll get.
For example a 500 ton cable between UK and France will not cause the same ADG as a 500 ton steel ball, -
at the surface.
For example ask why astronomic bodies ball are ball shaped.
Answer:
Because of the strength of gravity depend of how effective you can
encircle surround a central point of space.
If Domus Vista would have been a ball shape, the ADG would have been probably 5 times stronger.
You can say that building deviate approximately 80% from a ball shape.
THIS make a building so difficult to estimate / calculte.
5) The COG cannot be objectively determined, since we do not know the baseline gravity, before the building was erected.
(In case you forgot, you already acknowledged this fact):
Anyway you should be able to point to a place where the measured ADG line is crossing the FAG line.
My friend you CANNOT, unless manipulating everything to a different planet. –
PLEASE – RESPECT – You have a limit (very few percent) to adjust for "disturbances", and this will NEVER make it possible to adjust the increasing 160µgal negative ADG towards the 3 rd floor, - out in the BUSH.
Yes the COG is VERY low in that building it do ALSO surprise me.
BUT when you begin to understand the NEW theory, it is NO surprise.
The new theory have its own logic, and ITS OWN COG.
I too is LEARNING to understand the new theory...
6) In the ideal case (a homogeneous mass), the slope mentioned in #3 will be a straight line. However, since the actual building is not homogeneous, we must expect some deviations. In particular, since there is a very massive separation between the 2nd and 3rd floor, we must expect a steeper slope for the lowest 3-4 floors.
The heavy concrete floor at 3rd floor, (mainly) only disturbs t
he measuring on 3rd floor.
It will give you a local pull
downwards.
All you need to do is just to add (estimate) some more negative ADG to that floor, - and this brings the COG near 5th floor.
According to YOUR creed, Bjarne, what is your prediction?
My prediction has all the time been that ADG is stable towards to the COG.
BUT from the surface and outwards everything is correct understood.
Furthermore the COG is NOT determinate by the center /balance of mass, - BUT only by how fast you’ll sink into the space vacuum, - and THIS depend on 2 things;
- the amount of mass on your path towards the center (COG)
- and /r2 from the surface and to the COG...
These 2 factors give you the ADG per distance, - and this MUST be
conteracted by the
same law (1+2) from the oppesite direction
It’s a
completely new understanding.
Do you self the favor FORGET the old creeds, - it will only prevent you to understand and confuse you.
!
