• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bitcoin - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
My point is that even if person A says it's not a currency and it's terrible, and person B says it's the worst currency doesn't mean A's argument is inconsistent.
Of course it is! It makes no sense to compare bitcoin to a currency if it isn't a currency (and this thread has had many a passionate argument about this) so, let's suddenly start calling it a currency.
 
Of course it is! It makes no sense to compare bitcoin to a currency if it isn't a currency (and this thread has had many a passionate argument about this) so, let's suddenly start calling it a currency.

You do realise that you are saying that one person's argument is invalid because of another person's argument, which you also disagree with, right ?
 
You do realise that you are saying that one person's argument is invalid because of another person's argument, which you also disagree with, right ?
I have no idea what you are talking about.

There is no question that bitcoin had a bad year pricewise and even buyers of the Russian Rouble would have fared better (although the Rouble has never enjoyed the spectacular gains of bitcoin the year before).

I just find it ironic that bitcoin opponents who argue themselves blue in the face that "BITCOIN IS NOT A CURRENCY!!!!" suddenly describe it as a currency because it suits their agenda.
 
I just find it ironic that bitcoin opponents who argue themselves blue in the face that "BITCOIN IS NOT A CURRENCY!!!!" suddenly describe it as a currency because it suits their agenda.

Who did that?
 
Amazing. I confirmed it with you, and you agreed, and now you don't understand.

Well, go back and read the last few posts.
I still don't see it. It must be my poor communication skills. Let me try again:
Code:
if (isCurrency(BTC)) {
   ****Happens(BTC);
} else {
   ****Happens(BTC);
}

Edited by LashL: 
Edited to properly mask profanity. Please see Rule 10.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still don't see it. It must be my poor communication skills. Let me try again:

No, it's your poor reading skills.

The person saying it's a bad currency isn't the same person saying it's not a currency. How one can be used as an argument against the other boggles the mind.
 


Maybe you guys should take it to PMs--I don't think either of you understand what the other is saying. :D ;)

ETA: Which I think says something about Bitcoin...
 
Last edited:

I have already explained it to you, but I'll try again: someone on the internet says that BTC is the worst currency. That doesn't mean that someone else, who says it's not a currency, is wrong. It sure doesn't mean that they are being inconsistent, since they are not the same person.
 
I have already explained it to you, but I'll try again: someone on the internet says that BTC is the worst currency. That doesn't mean that someone else, who says it's not a currency, is wrong. It sure doesn't mean that they are being inconsistent, since they are not the same person.
The irony is that someone who says that bitcoin is not a currency is quoting somebody who says that bitcoin is a currency (albeit the "worst" one).

I know that remirol has already implied that he always believed that bitcoin is a currency but you can be sure that jhunter1163 has never argued that bitcoin is a currency.
 
The irony is that someone who says that bitcoin is not a currency is quoting somebody who says that bitcoin is a currency (albeit the "worst" one).

I know that remirol has already implied that he always believed that bitcoin is a currency but you can be sure that jhunter1163 has never argued that bitcoin is a currency.

It's certainly not a currency in any practical sense. A theoretical argument might be made, but down here in the real world it's not what most people think of when they think of "currency".
 
The irony is that someone who says that bitcoin is not a currency is quoting somebody who says that bitcoin is a currency (albeit the "worst" one).

Not "quoting" -- "is linking to an article which says".

I don't see the problem here. I don't consider it a currency; I consider it a commodity. The article-writer chose to call it a currency. I don't agree with his terminology, but he's definitely right that if you measure it as a currency, it was a big pile of **** over 2014.

All you have to do is read the words and respond to those, instead of the ones you hear inside your mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom