It's not my claim. Check out their links.
And presto! Bitcoin has become a currency.
It's not my claim. Check out their links.
Of course it is! It makes no sense to compare bitcoin to a currency if it isn't a currency (and this thread has had many a passionate argument about this) so, let's suddenly start calling it a currency.My point is that even if person A says it's not a currency and it's terrible, and person B says it's the worst currency doesn't mean A's argument is inconsistent.
Of course it is! It makes no sense to compare bitcoin to a currency if it isn't a currency (and this thread has had many a passionate argument about this) so, let's suddenly start calling it a currency.
I have no idea what you are talking about.You do realise that you are saying that one person's argument is invalid because of another person's argument, which you also disagree with, right ?
I have no idea what you are talking about.
I just find it ironic that bitcoin opponents who argue themselves blue in the face that "BITCOIN IS NOT A CURRENCY!!!!" suddenly describe it as a currency because it suits their agenda.
I still don't see it. It must be my poor communication skills. Let me try again:Amazing. I confirmed it with you, and you agreed, and now you don't understand.
Well, go back and read the last few posts.
if (isCurrency(BTC)) {
****Happens(BTC);
} else {
****Happens(BTC);
}
I still don't see it. It must be my poor communication skills. Let me try again:
So?The person saying it's a bad currency isn't the same person saying it's not a currency.
Why?
Why?
The irony is that someone who says that bitcoin is not a currency is quoting somebody who says that bitcoin is a currency (albeit the "worst" one).I have already explained it to you, but I'll try again: someone on the internet says that BTC is the worst currency. That doesn't mean that someone else, who says it's not a currency, is wrong. It sure doesn't mean that they are being inconsistent, since they are not the same person.
The irony is that someone who says that bitcoin is not a currency is quoting somebody who says that bitcoin is a currency (albeit the "worst" one).
I know that remirol has already implied that he always believed that bitcoin is a currency but you can be sure that jhunter1163 has never argued that bitcoin is a currency.
The irony is that someone who says that bitcoin is not a currency is quoting somebody who says that bitcoin is a currency (albeit the "worst" one).