psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
'Robust' recovery? Or dead cat bounce.

'Robust' recovery? Or dead cat bounce.

It's now at 14200, and still fluctuating vigorously, so it's far from proven that the recovery to 16000 was lasting. What does your algorithm have to say about that?Absolutely, but it may be weird enough to screw people all ways, judging by the robust recovery to 16,000.
Can the brand beat off competitors, like Amazon in the selling space, and so on, despite there being no barriers to entry?
I do note it responds to my TA algorithm superbly, check my thread that was rubbished by my friend Psion.
There was a significant DCB immediately after the big day of the 1929 NYSE crash, which was on Tuesday October 29. Says Galbraith.'Robust' recovery? Or dead cat bounce.
Bad? Good?
I fully admit that I can't figure out your theories which to me resemble more the ravings of an obsessive than the result of profound meditation. Your idea, repeated in this post, but already stated hereWell, untold trillions have been looted by the issuance of fiat currencies throughout history. The Federal Reserve Note relies on the petrodollar scam, which itself relies on the US Military to do violence against anyone who would dare sell oil in a non-dollar currency, as well as domestic legal tender laws and the full force of government.
On the other hand with a float of roughly 17 million bitcoin at a price of roughly $15,000, the bitcoin market cap is roughly "only" $255 billion. On top of that, it's a decentralized and completely voluntary system. No one is holding a gun to the head of anyone deciding to buy bitcoin for whatever reason. I'll leave it to you to decide which is "bad" or "good". I doubt you will be able to figure it out, though.
is startling. Here in the UK people point guns at other people not in order to force them to accept Sterling, but to force them to relinquish as much of it as they happen to be carrying at the time.Bitcoin is a digital asset that was designed with the intention of one day being a currency. Whether or not something becomes a medium of exchange takes time, and acceptance, unless you're a government who can force people to do things at the barrel of a gun.
Why don't you post something that wasn't already posted a million times in 2011? The numbers may change but the ridiculousness never does.It's now at 14200, and still fluctuating vigorously, so it's far from proven that the recovery to 16000 was lasting. What does your algorithm have to say about that?
I admit the recovery was impressive in its way. Who is buying now? Is it libertarians maxing out their credit cards to destroy the hated fiat scam counterfeit dollar imposed on freeborn Americans by the Rothschild-dominated conspirators of the Federal Reserve? If that is what's happening then this is more serious than the 1636 Tulip mania.
RJ made the same post on 5 September 2017. (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11984488&postcount=860)I see your friend psion is having a snooze. Very wise.
What is it you are claiming is ridiculous and jackass? That the recent Bitcoin behaviour is a speculative bubble? You are saying that is not merely incorrect, but ridiculous. You're saying that the best strategy is to buy at any market price and hold indefinitely?Why don't you post something that wasn't already posted a million times in 2011? The numbers may change but the ridiculousness never does.
RJ made the same post on 5 September 2017. (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11984488&postcount=860)
He frequently pops in to say that "this time it really is the bubble (truly ruly)" - just like you do.
I'm sure that you know I was referring to the differences between 2011 and 2017. What the posters were saying in 2011 proved to be wrong but you repeat them (ad-nauseum) in 2017 and suddenly it becomes correct?< ... totally OT response deleted ...>
ftfy.The idea of a purely digital currency that cannot be hacked, cannot be controlled, and is purely a medium of exchange has been realized.
Who said it should?Bitcoin does not have the features of an ideal digital currency.
So what? The point here is that Bitcoin is not a means af avoiding currency crimes perpetrated by the guvmint against honest freeborn Americans. Bitcoin is a theatre of criminality like the Nigerian 419 scams or the drugs trade as you correctly suggest. All speculative bubbles have that element. But libertarians exculpate these scammers: It's their victims who "fail to exercise due diligence" who are at fault.ftfy.
Who said it should?
Naturally, scammers are on the wings ready to fleece would be investors in this medium who fail to exercise due diligence. They also flog "get rich quick" schemes over currency trading, day trading in stocks, marijuana, rich Nigerian relatives etc etc etc.
You won't confront this, will you? It will go up forever? It's the God Bubble. Nobody has to go to the trouble of creating real wealth or value again, if that's correct. We can all simply wait for Bitcoin to rise in price forever ... can you not see the fallacy in that reasoning?I'm sure that you know I was referring to the differences between 2011 and 2017. What the posters were saying in 2011 proved to be wrong but you repeat them (ad-nauseum) in 2017 and suddenly it becomes correct?
I don't have a crystal ball and neither do you.You won't confront this, will you? It will go up forever?
It is not just the dishonest schemes that are the purvey of scammers. A lot of scammers suggest that you can game legitimate investments (you may have seen a poster here recently who believes that "technical analysis" is a guaranteed winner).Bitcoin is a theatre of criminality like the Nigerian 419 scams or the drugs trade as you correctly suggest.
Why? Because they will always go up and up? For if they ever stop and crash then you are the one who will be blushing, and you expect never to be doing that.I don't have a crystal ball and neither do you.
What I can say with a high degree of probability is that at some point in the not too far distant future, bitcoin prices will be such that whenever you remember the posts you are making now you will blush with embarrassment.
If you are referring to these words of yours, I still have a problem, which I will explain again.
My algorithm I use to make suggestions, and bitcoin trades accordingly. I saw a great buy indication a few days ago, which I would not mention on this thread.It's now at 14200, and still fluctuating vigorously, so it's far from proven that the recovery to 16000 was lasting. What does your algorithm have to say about that?
I admit the recovery was impressive in its way. Who is buying now? Is it libertarians maxing out their credit cards to destroy the hated fiat scam counterfeit dollar imposed on freeborn Americans by the Rothschild-dominated conspirators of the Federal Reserve? If that is what's happening then this is more serious than the 1636 Tulip mania.
I see your friend psion is having a snooze. Very wise.
ftfy.
Who said it should?
Naturally, scammers are on the wings ready to fleece would be investors in this medium who fail to exercise due diligence. They also flog "get rich quick" schemes over currency trading, day trading in stocks, marijuana, rich Nigerian relatives etc etc etc.
Your feeble attempt to turn this around on me won't work. I am not the one making a specific prediction. You are. The onus is on you to prove your claims. So far you haven't been able to come up with a single argument that wasn't thoroughly discredited way back in 2011 and every year since.If you are referring to these words of yours, I still have a problem, which I will explain again.What I can say with a high degree of probability is that at some point in the not too far distant future, bitcoin prices will be such that whenever you remember the posts you are making now you will blush with embarrassment.What does this mean? It means that you will be embarrassed if the price ever falls significantly. It will be you who will blush in that case. Therefore you must either be saying that you will blush as much as you say I will, or alternatively you're saying that the price will not crash at all ever. Which of these alternatives do you have in mind?