Fault? The point is Coburn was not prepared to back-up his claim, and then immediately backed down when told he was in error. Obviously, O'Reilly actually believed what he said was true. His staff let him down.
Fault? The Speaker of The House, a major crafter of the health care insurance reform bill, didn't know jail time was not a condition for failure to comply. It is not Pelosi's fault that she is a benighted botoxer. While O'Reilly should know better, Pelosi can't help herself.
... pointless BS ...
I can't speak to the veracity of your links but the two statements are not quite the same:
I don't have the exact quote, but didn't Pelosi say something like
something very close to what I wrote
"you won't" vs "we won't.."
So, what O'Reilly is saying now: nobody at Fox News has claimed that the Health Care Bill as passed will actually send you to jail. There was a lot of talk on Fox News back before it passed that jail time was a possible result of not complying with the proposed bill at that time.
Anybody have a clue as to whether or not jail time was a possibility that wasn't actually realized (so it would have made more sense to talk about it then, but not now)?
I've not seen a single quote that shows O'Reilly wrong on this -- has anyone else?
My guess is that they did not explicitly rule out jettisoning people off into space either as punishment for not having purchased jail time.
Let me understand you here. You want someone to find a quote, I assume, from a draft bill that explicitly says that jail time is not a possibility. Is that the evidence you are looking for?
I'm looking for evidence that there was or was not a change in the bill on this point, or at least a change in understanding about the bill on this point, so it would or would not have made sense for the Fox News pundits to talk about the bill in late 2009 but not since it passed.
What Bill claimed is that no one on Fox News has never said, "you'll go to jail if you don't buy health insurance".
If Fox News only talked about it prospectively (as a possibility in the coming bill) but not in actuality (never as an actual consequence of the bill having passed), then I'm inclined to say that O'Reilly was correct. There is a distinction between saying that the health care bill would do this before it passed (and nobody could know exactly what would end up in it), and saying that the health care bill has done this once it passed. Again, is there any evidence that the Fox News folks have said the latter?
Or, she could have felt that her job at the time was to sell the bill to the American public and in politics it often happens that addressing a lie, even to refute it, just gives the lie credence and dilutes the message she is trying to get out. So she did what any politician (right or left) would have done. She ignored what in her mind was a lie and went straight to pre-planned talking points.
I've been in Mexico for two weeks on a work trip and have been watching CNN as the news channel on the box. Came in tonight to catch up on the travel chaos in the EU for my return home and that lying sack of crap O'Reilly is on that channel on Fox. As you can imagine the manager has just had an earful and told in no uncertain terms to get it changed back.
The "mandate" isn't even a real mandate. Read the bill, people. You can download it for free. It states that:
1. People are mandated to pay. If not:
2. There is a fee/tax to be paid. If someone does not pay the fee/tax:
3. They will really be fined.
4. The fine cannot be garnished from pay. Nor can any assets be collected, nor can the person go to jail for the fines..
That is the final bill that passed. Not what was considered to be part of the bill back in October/November, 2009 when FOX News hosts/punidts/contributors pointed out the inclusion of "civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance."
Do you not comprehend this distinction?
Right. So the Republicans must've helped to change it to the current status..........
That would be another thread. This one concerns the "dishonesty" of Bill O'Reilly in denying that FOX News on-air people ever said Americans can go to jail for health care non-compliance. O'Reilly should apologize to Coburn and to all those at FOX News who were completely correct to say what they did regarding a possible penalty for non-compliance when they said this before the final bill became law.
Better stick to the BBC. Their brand of bias won't give you colic.
So it should be easy to find the line in the bill that specified those criminal penalties. While you're off finding it, we'll stay here and keep reality warm for you.
All kidding aside, it's a complete fabrication and you know it.
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter...vative-group-says-youll-be-imprisoned-not-ha/