Yeah. I read your post. That is why I wrote the reply. I take it you have no response.
Bill Gates and Vaccines
- Thread starter Deetee
- Start date
Yeah. I read your post. That is why I wrote the reply. I take it you have no response.
!Kaggen
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,874
Well then I can't help you and if your on a witch hunt I suggest you find someone more entertaining than me.
Let me guess, it causes autism?
Actually vaccines don't save lives, that's what the medical system wants you to believe, so they can make more money off of you.
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/pubhealth/rosner/g8965/client_edit/readings/week_2/mckinlay.pdf
So if you want to spend a lot of money on one way to save lives, you have to spend lots of money on every other ways to save lives otherwise there is something wrong with spending lots of money to saves lives.
Stupidest argument ever.
At least you'll admit to being a nutjob.
KoihimeNakamura
Creativity Murderer
It's not the only 'adverse reaction' you can have, but generally yes, that's what I was looking for.
KoihimeNakamura
Creativity Murderer
You're only 10 years out of date too~
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
!Kaggen
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,874
Nope that is your strawman and yes it is stupid.
Kid Eager
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 7,296
tell me again, what were you actually looking for?
Then you should have no problems citing scientific studies showing that it does in fact cause autism. Ready. Go.
You were asked what wrong with spending lots of money on vaccines. You responded:
Thus my post is a completely accurate description of your stated position.
Perhaps you now realize how stupid it is and are trying to distance yourself it.
oh great! well that's done then.
For a group of skeptics who use science to back up their claims, you are the actual gullible ones. It's funny that you'd trust and defend a huge corporation that makes billions of dollars, but attack smaller entities and individuals trying to break out what they think is the truth about all this, as nutjobs. Honestly, if you were skeptics, logically you'd be more cautious about the big corporation that could be affecting your life, instead of attacking people that won't affect your life.
This isn't even a society of skeptics, it's a society of blind authority followers, and you just get angry when someone breaks out from what you believe to be right, because you've been told it is.
No, he means that if you're trying to help people, doing so in a way where you're guaranteeing yourself billions of dollars is kind of fishy. There are ways of helping people in other ways.
Travis
Misanthrope of the Mountains
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 24,133
So your evidence is that vaccines are made by a large corporation and therefore they must be bad?
Oh and thimerosal is a good thing. It was very, very stupid to ban it since there was no reason to get rid of such a valuable preservative.
No, I get angry because anti-vaxxer nutjobs kill people by encouraging them to not get vaccines which prevent deadly diseases.
If you were alive that long ago, and you read something like that I'm sure you wouldn't care.
What was true then, is true now unless proven different.
Proper procedure would be to show how vaccinations have changed since the release of that paper.
But great argument, the ridicule question... are you serious...?
haha
What the **** are you talking about. Bill Gates already has tens of billions of dollars. He is giving away a big chunk of that to save lives via vaccines.
I've provided you with evidence as to how diseases had decreased substantially and were on a huge decline when penicillin etc was discovered. Obviously you just ignored my 'mumbo jumbo' article.
If you have an article on antivaxxer nutjobs killing people by encouraging them to not get vaccines your welcome to share. If you also have one on people dying because they didn't get a vaccine you can share that as well.