Bigfoot - serious, not follies

[erikbeckjord]

Mr. Beckjord - why, exactly, are you here? What has caused to you to inflict yourself upon us?

1_Because I cannot stand moronic thinking, 2) to rescue the intelligent 2%

 

[erikbeckjord]

So were you serious in the other thread when you said this:



If so, the popular reaction seems to be this:

It was once popular to say the world was flat., that man would never fly, that we would never get to the moon. BONK!

BUT I SEE SOME DECENT AND INTELLIGENT PEOPLE ARE HERE, AND ARE COMING FORTH. BRAVOS!

 

[TjW]

1_Because I cannot stand moronic thinking, 2) to rescue the intelligent 2%

Well, then, I think you ought to sit down.

 

[varwoche]

I sorta enjoy sincere, goofy incredulity like this, from the web site..

Beckjord
Note in the sequence above, the baby head, or baboon/critter head on upper left side of the adult head. How do you fake THAT????

 

[Ipecac]

Re: Reply to absurd post

Reply:

what the majority (popular) thinks is flat-a** wrong.

I have 29 years in the field that show this.

Now, how about some mature, adult, reasoning?

Is this forum full of 13 year olds? If so, go back to your
X-Box games.

But you never answered my question. Which was this:

So were you serious in the other thread when you said this:

yes, cameras may get good photos of a FUZZY BEING..

as shapeshifters, they may shift at 100,000/sec
and so appear fuzzy
to us

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

But you never answered my question. Which was this:

REPLY: 100% SERIOUS.,

DID YOU THINK I AM BULLSH*TTING YOU PEOPLE>>???

FOR WHAT IN GOD'S GREEN EARTH MAKES YOU THINK

I AM NOT SERIOUS?

 

[erikbeckjord]

Well, then, I think you ought to sit down.

Edited by Darat: 

Content removed for breaching your Membership Agreement.

You have been suspended until the matter is reviewed by the Moderating Team.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat

 

[erikbeckjord]

How can you tell the difference, especially considering you've already admitted you don't have proof? I think you're just looking for closed minds who share your unfounded beliefs.


A rivalry between two people without evidence. Aside from the possibility of a few funny ad hominems, this should be quite boring.


Then please do so. With evidence.


I'm on this forum for multiple reasons: To try and save people from their delusions by pointing out other possible explanations or the absence of good evidence. To learn about some scientific matters. The only place here I specifically go to for laughs is the humor forum. Laughs from the other portions of the forum are just a common side bonus.

Oh, and a friend wanted me to ask you: Why would bigfeet shapeshift so much? Seems like a big waste of energy.

Personally, I think that question is pointless because you haven't proven they exist.


Of course not: We have yet to see evidence that bigfoot exists. Without that, there's no point in speculating.

REPLY: TOTALLY MORONIC Q. \

Oh, and a friend wanted me to ask you: Why would bigfeet shapeshift so much? Seems like a big waste of energy.

====ARE ALL OF YOU THIS WAY?

BONK!

 

[SezMe]

Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

REPLY: 100% SERIOUS.,

DID YOU THINK I AM BULLSH*TTING YOU PEOPLE>>???

FOR WHAT IN GOD'S GREEN EARTH MAKES YOU THINK

I AM NOT SERIOUS?

Hmm, here are a few reasons, just for starters:

- ALL CAPS responses. Yelling does not imply validity.
- Multiple "?" does not imply validity.
- Lack of independently verifiable evidence.
- Argument from Authority ("I have been at this for X years").
- Lack of logical, rational, scientific evidence.
- Wacky web site with numerous unrelated claims that are, well, silly.
- Photos that are blurry, subject to interpretation, etc.
- Personal hubris ("rescue the intelligent 2%")

and on and on and on and on.

That, erik, is an example of what we here call "evidence". Got some?

 

[Yeah_Right]

Erik doesn't have evidence he's just like the other woos that want us to believe without question. It's either that or he's got nothing better to do than goof around on this message board.

 

[H3LL]

Re: Re: Re: HUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM

Evidence of bf in a manifested state. Which is not full time.

Hmm!

I'm curious about your estimations of time intervals while out-of-phase/manifested.

We had the Yeti clearly walk through a 10cm brick wall.

Curiously, it walked around temple buildings. One can only speculate that living with this creature for so long they may be familiar with its limitations and how long it can be out-of-phase before re-manifesting without slipping into temporal-transfer. The temple walls are noticably thicker and the monks are curiously tight-lipped when trying to get construction details.

As for evidence. We still have the wall. These so-called sceptics can stick that in their collective pipes and smoke it.

I'm assured that a latent field (possibly quantum) indicated that it may have left either hair or, with luck, part of a claw embedded within the wall, but the field faded fast.

The wall has been left intact. "Only a fool will destroy something to see how it works."

They just SO don't understand.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Erik doesn't have evidence he's just like the other woos that want us to believe without question. It's either that or he's got nothing better to do than goof around on this message board.

Exactly what are you doing here that is worth while? At least you got rid of that silly dog. All you skeptix destroy, but you never build. Never do research.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Re: Re: HUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM

Hmm!

I'm curious about your estimations of time intervals while out-of-phase/manifested.

We had the Yeti clearly walk through a 10cm brick wall.

Curiously, it walked around temple buildings. One can only speculate that living with this creature for so long they may be familiar with its limitations and how long it can be out-of-phase before re-manifesting without slipping into temporal-transfer. The temple walls are noticably thicker and the monks are curiously tight-lipped when trying to get construction details.

As for evidence. We still have the wall. These so-called sceptics can stick that in their collective pipes and smoke it.

I'm assured that a latent field (possibly quantum) indicated that it may have left either hair or, with luck, part of a claw embedded within the wall, but the field faded fast.

The wall has been left intact. "Only a fool will destroy something to see how it works."

They just SO don't understand.

Bigfoot never told me. Nor you.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Erik doesn't have evidence he's just like the other woos that want us to believe without question. It's either that or he's got nothing better to do than goof around on this message board.

Appearantly you skeptix are too dumb to see that I never claimed to have the final proof, at all, or ever.

You guys asleep???



BONK!

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Hmm, here are a few reasons, just for starters:

- ALL CAPS responses. Yelling does not imply validity.
- Multiple "?" does not imply validity.
- Lack of independently verifiable evidence.
- Argument from Authority ("I have been at this for X years").
- Lack of logical, rational, scientific evidence.
- Wacky web site with numerous unrelated claims that are, well, silly.
- Photos that are blurry, subject to interpretation, etc.
- Personal hubris ("rescue the intelligent 2%")

and on and on and on and on.

That, erik, is an example of what we here call "evidence". Got some?

rEPLY -- GO BACK AND READ ALL MY POSTS.

As for style, who cares? This is a trivial board.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Well, then, I think you ought to sit down.

Trivial post. Trivial guy.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Summary to date

You guys do no research.
You jump to conclusions about what is claimed, or not.
You wallow in trivial discourse.
You have not read any of the relevant books.
You do not know the major or minor authors.
You do not contribute, except to try (badly) to tear down.
Some of you babble.
One person had a good idea -- brava... re sharp photos of a fuzzy
life form.
One person promotes out of date ideas..LAL (Lu-Woo)
None of you seem to know why you are here.

I'm not very impressed.

EB

 

[LAL]

If being interested in Sasquatches since 1968 makes me a newbie, I'm a newbie, but Beckjord is completely wrong on my gender. Odd, since I made it clear on the other thread, which he seems to have read. I'm as up-to-date as I can get, especially regarding incidents in April this year in two countries.

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

 

[Psiload]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire.

It sounds like this guy should have done likewise:

http://www.24hourscholar.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is_6_23/ai_57533282

Looking for Mr. Goodape
Skeptical Inquirer, Nov, 1999 by Robert Sheaffer

Pretty funny.

And check this out:

http://www.ufowatchdog.com/vile.html

Also: in air, to disable hijackers, as a LAST resort, open emergency door or emergency window a crack, if you can, try to be tied in with seat belt or other straps, and DECOMPRESS THE PLANE. Pilot will have to dive plane to get to lower altitude. In some cases, this may crash the plane, but this is better than dying by smashing into the Empire State Building and killing thousands.

Also: the Beckjord Blanket Blocking technique can enable you to fend off a knife with folded blanket while you and others hit hijackers with anything you can - fists, laptop, trays,bottles, your pulled-out belt with heavy buckle at end, even shaken champagne (in first class),etc.

Also: Muslims abhor pig meat. Do not laugh, but if you bring on canned Spam, which is pig meat, you can open it and throw bits at them, to force them back. You must chant: "Pig meat!" over and over. Some, not all, will recoil and back off.

 

[Bronze Dog]

REPLY: TOTALLY MORONIC Q. \

Oh, and a friend wanted me to ask you: Why would bigfeet shapeshift so much? Seems like a big waste of energy.

====ARE ALL OF YOU THIS WAY?

BONK!

Fallacy: Appeal to Ridicule