Bigfoot - serious, not follies

[jmercer]

Mr. Beckjord - why, exactly, are you here? What has caused to you to inflict yourself upon us?

 

[Bronze Dog]

Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

You understand that Bigfoot is not proven by science to be an f&b animal. It is also not proven by science (nor me) to be
a supernatural being.

It hasn't been proven to even exist by science.

All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods with me and you ain't.

Show us a DNA sample, or better yet, a specimen. Then we'll believe that Bigfoot exists. From what you're showing us, however, there doesn't seem to be anything going on.

BUT on my website there are photos of such tracks from Brian Smith's video.

Very unimpressive photos that could be just about anything.

Many of you will sluff this off and call me a liar.
(I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.)

I won't. I suspect you're in the category of delusional.

Now if this is not enuff, and stills never are, I will not lose sleep if you do not accept it. (as if I care...)

Photos never are enough. DNA, specimens, or equally extraordinary evidence, please.

My respect is for field researchers who GO OUT and share and witness this stuff...

Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla,
StanGordon and others.

(but not anonymoist posters)

I also respect field researchers. Too bad I've never heard of a Bigfoot field researcher coming back with anything worthwhile. Like DNA or specimens.

 

[SpaceFluffer]

Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods
with me and you ain't.

Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire.

Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla,
StanGordon and others.
(but not anonymoist posters)

Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters.

Many of you will live in denial, a place in Egypt.

Denial of non-existent evidence you mean? And as opposed to you, who seems to live in a sparkly dream world populated by magical elves and pixies?

 

[Starrman]

From Web-Site

SPIRIT PHOTOS OF NICOLE B. SIMPSON & RON GOLDMAN - they tell us OJ DID IT !

You should write for the 'Weekly World News'. You don't seriously believe this, do you?

 

[jmercer]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire.

Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters.

Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!!

 

[erikbeckjord]

Mr. Beckjord - why, exactly, are you here? What has caused to you to inflict yourself upon us?

I am here to save you from the error(s) of your ways.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!!

Youse do unnerstan a deliberate malaprop,

don't youse?

Or are skeptics too dense for puns?

 

[CurtC]

Mr. Beckjord -

Here's an HTML trick that you might not know about - the "blink" tag. You can use it anywhere on the page that you want to draw attention to a certain set of words. Put those words between "blink" an"/blink" tags. It's even more effective when it's used a lot on a page.

(I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.)

When does schizophrenia usually strike - the early 20s?

 

[erikbeckjord]

From Web-Site



You should write for the 'Weekly World News'. You don't seriously believe this, do you?

Why should you doubt me? (Go see the books of ghost photos at
Gettysburgh civil war field.)

I don;t put lies on websites.

Besides, Nicole got her revenge...

OJ has lost his hair.



WHEN DO I MEET SOME INTELLECTUAL SKEPTIX??? I'VE DEBATED THE MAJOR ONES OFF THE NET.

Most of you guys think name-calling is actual debate.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Mr. Beckjord -

Here's an HTML trick that you might not know about - the "blink" tag. You can use it anywhere on the page that you want to draw attention to a certain set of words. Put those words between "blink" an"/blink" tags. It's even more effective when it's used a lot on a page.

When does schizophrenia usually strike - the early 20s?

Thanks for html blink info.

Now, why is my signature website address not right?

Ought to be http://www.beckjord.com/bigfoottribephotos

but did did something wrong in html in the profile.

Hmmmm??? Please assist.

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!!

As I had planned .....

after all, I am in Mensa.

EB

 

[Ladewig]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Youse do unnerstan a deliberate malaprop,

I want to make sure I understand your position. Correct me if I am wrong. You come to skeptic board to present a theory so revolutionary that it would irrevocably change science and the world as we know it and you decide the best way to do that is by deliberately misspelling words for humorous effect?

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire.

Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters.

Denial of non-existent evidence you mean? And as opposed to you, who seems to live in a sparkly dream world populated by magical elves and pixies? [/B]

Fluffer -- describes you well,

but there is another definition, used in the porn industry,

for a lady who , uh, "prepares" the male actor......

if you get my drift....

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

I want to make sure I understand your position. Correct me if I am wrong. You come to skeptic board to present a theory so revolutionary that it would irrevocably change science and the world as we know it and you decide the best way to do that is by deliberately misspelling words for humorous effect?

You have to disguise the cod liver oil with sugar and cream...

GET IT?

Besides, lots of trivial folks here....

who play for the laffs.

COMPRENDO?

but credit for seeing this is a major, revolutionary idea. AND IT IS!

 

[Bronze Dog]

Why should you doubt me? (Go see the books of ghost photos at Gettysburgh civil war field.)

I'm doubting you because you say fuzzy blobs that could be anything are proof of bigfoot. Give me DNA or a specimen.

I've seen a large number of "ghost" photos. They only feature dust, hairs, .jpeg compression artifacts, or nothing at all. Ask mayday about them. Maybe you can show me some of those photos you're talking about. I need a good laugh.

I don;t put lies on websites.

No one's accused you of lying (at least no one I've seen). I think you're just plain wrong.

WHEN DO I MEET SOME INTELLECTUAL SKEPTIX??? I'VE DEBATED THE MAJOR ONES OFF THE NET.

Most of you guys think name-calling is actual debate.

You're the one with the most ad hominems going on, and no evidence. You only have a handful of photos that you haven't even attempted to show aren't the result of pareidolia.

 

[erikbeckjord]

I'm doubting you because you say fuzzy blobs that could be anything are proof of bigfoot. Give me DNA or a specimen.

I've seen a large number of "ghost" photos. They only feature dust, hairs, .jpeg compression artifacts, or nothing at all. Ask mayday about them. Maybe you can show me some of those photos you're talking about. I need a good laugh.


No one's accused you of lying (at least no one I've seen). I think you're just plain wrong.


You're the one with the most ad hominems going on, and no evidence. You only have a handful of photos that you haven't even attempted to show aren't the result of pareidolia.

nOW,NOW,NOW, where did I ever say the photos are proof of Bigfoot, ??? Where?
I presume you can read, so did you NOT read my disclaimers???? Tsk! I expect more from skeptix.
The photos are indicators that something alien or weird might exist in some form or another.And I never,never,never said this is proof. TSK,TSK!

Ad hominems? Count them.....all by others, I just reply and then people cry.

 

[Bronze Dog]

My apologies, then... So, what are you doing here?

 

[Mr. Skinny]

Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Now if this is not enuff, and stills never are, I will not lose sleep if
you do not accept it. (as if I care...)

If you already know stills are not enough, and never are, and you also don't care if we accept your evidence, why, exactly, have you come here?

Just curious.

Also, didn't someone admit that he faked that "famous" bigfoot video?

 

[erikbeckjord]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

If you already know stills are not enough, and never are, and you also don't care if we accept your evidence, why, exactly, have you come here?

Just curious.

Also, didn't someone admit that he faked that "famous" bigfoot video?

1) so you believe any statement as long it implies a hoax.

2) you believe anything you read in the papers?

3) bonk!

4) I am here to fish for the 2% intelligent ones to bring to our side. MOST OF YOU DO NOT QUALIFY

BUT it is worth it.

Already have 6 favorable PMs --- complimenting me for having the guts to post here. The lions den, the BELLY OF THE BEAST.

 

[Bronze Dog]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

1) so you believe any statement as long it implies a hoax.

Nope. I don't believe the moon landings were hoaxed. It'd be a lot easier to go to the moon than to construct such a huge conspiracy.

2) you believe anything you read in the papers?

Yes. I believe a sizable piece of what's in there. I also disbelieve a sizable piece.

3) bonk!

Ow.

4) I am here to fish for the 2% intelligent ones to bring to our side. MOST OF YOU DO NOT QUALIFY

How do you intend to fish without bait? Skeptics respond to evidence. You've already admitted you don't have proof.

BUT it is worth it.

Already have 6 favorable PMs --- complimenting me for having the guts to post here. The lions den, the BELLY OF THE BEAST.

They're probably trolls. Trolls are only interested in supporting their closeminded ideological agenda. Skeptics are only interested in evidence.