bigfoot is real I have the proof

Creekfreak, if you are going to pretend to be an illiterate rube, could you at least try to be consistent? Sometimes you know how to start a sentence by capitalizing the first letter, sometimes you don't. Sometimes you know how to place a period at the end of a sentence, sometimes you don't. At least put a little effort into whatever game you are playing, o.k.?
 
Never heard of nifong is he a good lawyer by chance ? No never been a part of any inventing clubs . I was involved with invent tech out of miami I was coned out of about 10 inventions . Thank God I held 20 better ones back !! I was just out of haveing one of my lungs removed and I needed money to survive so I tryed to cash in one some of my ideas .They promised me the moon so I sent them the plans for some of them . they told me my ideas where worth billons . Of course I was pumped up about it . But then they wanted money from me to do the enginering and a bunch of other crap after they told me it would not cost me anything just to get me to send them the plans . Now thats a damm con go after those basterds . I cant afford to sue them but someday I will if I ever get the chance . Thats ok I learned not to show what youve got from that . I know this may sound very far fetched to some but today myself and a buddie of mine may have watched an ivory bill woodpecker . He was the bigest woodpecker Ive ever seen the light was not very good so hard to see the color of his bill I did get a few glances and it looked to be white . I took about 10 pictures of it with a film camara and got close to 9 min of audio of his hamering of the tree he was working . What gets me is they will spend 50 million to study a bird that nobody has seen but they wont spend anything on an 8 foot creature that walks on two feet many have go figure .
 
So to sum up:

You are the creator of at least 30 inventions, some that are worth "billions".

You have hard evidence of Bigfoot.


You may have seen the ivory billed woodpecker.

Am I missing anything?

Edited for inaccuracy.
 
Last edited:
So to sum up:

You are the creator of at least 30 inventions, some that are worth "billions".

You have hard evidence of Bigfoot.


You have photographed the ivory billed woodpecker.

Am I missing anything?

I think the term "attention-whore" springs to mind here.

Norm
 
No I said I may have seen one today there is a big difference . I cant be sure its an ivory bill the light was not very good but it was the bigest woodpecker ive ever seen . So it is a rare sighting even if it is not one . No I could care less about attention but I do kind of injoy proveing people worng that are so sure of themselfs its kind of a hobby of mine .
 
Hey, Creek.

I see you're a bit of Burger King fan? Love whoppers?

Surely the fact that the guys in Bigfoot Forums didn't give you the time of day might have been some kind of guide that a skeptics' forum probably isn't going to be any easier to get help from?

creek at BFF Feb 2007 said:
Yes maybe I am a little crazzy for puting up with all the jabs that have been thrown at me on this forum I wouldent be here if I was not confident of what I am doing

No posting there for 8 months...
 
I am not worried about looseing my rights to it Ive got the sd card you cant duplicate that . Beleave me it would be easyer just to show it but if I do the value goes down . In other words if everybody has seen it then nobody will pay to see it in a magazine or where ever it is published . There is more to it I gave my word to the state I would not sale it with there choper in it . I told them I would crop it out . But that doesent mean someone else cant sale it with it in it . That seperates me from it if someone else owns the rights for one year they can do what they want with it . That way I wont get in trouble with the state for not following through on my word . just in case they try and convict me of threats to them or blackmailing or what ever else they can come up with . I am just protecting myself thats all I dont want a big leagle fight and if I can make money from it I think its worth trying . I would like for you all to see it but there is going to be some hoops to jump through first before everybody sees it . I am in no hurry someone may come along that wants to buy it if that dosent happen I might show it someday untell then I have to try and sale it fiirst . I have a lot invested in this over 4 years of intence study and field work . I have goten no help from anyone I think I desearve a little pay back for my efforts so I can keep going with better equipment to get more and better photos and video .No posting for 8 months but it has goten over 40 thousand hits being closed for that time . Last I saw before being baned from even looking it was over 52 thousand hits. It must be intresting reading to be geting more hits then any thread in there history
 
Last edited:
The state can't do anything about their helicopter being in the photo. The helicopter was flying in public, and you are free to photograph it in public. So that is not a valid reason.

The Shipton photos just sold for a lot of money, despite being posted all over the place and being available in hundreds of books.

The PGF would command a lot of money were it to be put up for sale.

There is no valid reason for you not to post your photos, except that you don't have them.

You can put a watermark on them. You can put your name on them. You can post small versions only. Etc.

There are shareware watermark programs that won't cost you anything. A friend can put the trademarks or watermarks on for you. You can email them to a friend who will do it for you.

Many photographers post their work on many potography sites all over the internet. They have no trouble maintaining the copyrights and selling copies of their photos to people who want to buy them, while still allowing the public to see what they are buying.

So stop prevaricating and let us see what you have.

Stop lying about not being able to sell them if you post copies of them.

Stop lying about a state owned helicopter that was flying in public keeping you from posting copies of the photos.

Put up or shut up.
 
I have given a private showing to the mabrc researchers in a private section of that site . it was water marked and had my name copyrighted on it .The reason for this is becouse I did not want them to be shown on the bff site . I have a very big dislike for them and feel they do not desearve to see it . You can go over there and ask about it and see what they say but I dout they will comment on it outside of the member ship they are people of there word also .ill be back in a few with what the managment of that site said about it if I still have it on file brb
 
http://www.airliners.net/

CF, here is a site chock full of the hard work of hundreds of photographers taking photographs of other people's aircraft, including state owned helicopters, government owned aircraft, and military aircraft. There are even photos of JANET flights to area 51 posted here.

All of these photos are copyrighted by their photographers and you can buy prints of them.

CF, the helicopter you photographed had a tail number by law. What was it?
 
Just to answer any questions before they get asked. When Creek sent this pic to me, I enlarged it 500% to see if I could tell if it had been photoshopped, and usually, when you add something like this, it will not blend into the surroundings, this did. I also compared the color of it to the surrounding area, and it appeared to be the same (Black areas). I also noted the lighting on the trees and the back of the head on the creature, from my view, it appears that the lighting is the same. I then spent a whole day going through Google Image Search and Yahoo Image Search looking for different ways for helicopter, fire, forestry, fire fighting, green, etc. and searched approx 8000+ pics to make sure this wasn't taken from a picture off the net and manufactured. This all goes into the verification of any picture I receive, so it should not be taken as distrust of Creek and what he said it was, I simply had to dot the i's and cross the t's before we could put it out there for anyone to look at. I took Creek at his word, but still had to verify all this like I would do on any picture. From what I have done and seen on this pic, it appears to be legit. I'm waiting on the person that did the enhancements to reply to my e-mails to see what was actually enhanced.
 
I'm assuming that is a quote from a person who examined the photograph. Link please, showing where this person wrote this.
 
yes but how many have 2 bigfoot creatures in them ? I can take photos of fighters all day I live by a base . Like ive said i dont have a problem showing them just not over the internet I will choose how people see them and that will be in person at this time .
 
sorry that could take a long time to find but it is from the mid america bigfoot research forum . If it is not in the general membership section it is in the private membership section that I dont have access to at this time . You can search there site if you want I dont think they have taken it down . I am on dail up so it would take me a while to find it its there though somewhere.
 
All of the numbers on the side of the choper are not visable becouse of some trees covering them where they where hovering . I would think though there are not very many forestry chopers to have to search through to find out witch one it is
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom