bigfoot is real I have the proof

Well, as long as Creekfreak has an apologist, shall I act this once as LAL's apologist?

Having occasionally been accused of settling for poor evidence, I think she'd go pretty far for good evidence if there were even an inkling of hope that you have it. Creek, if Lu says your claim is junk, you're sunk.
 
and a belated "Welcome to the forum" to Creekfreak's friend and colleague, ThunderFoot

Thanx Snow, I have known Creek for a good while and I do have faith in him. I do believe in the photgraphs and I do know the person who enhanced them for us. I trust John very much and know he would never put his name on the line if there had been any photoshopping done to this photograph. He has too much to loose over something like this.

Looking back over this thread there have been a LOT of disrespect to Creek in attempts to get him to crack and give up hope. I credit him for holding to his guns, although sometimes going off on tangents, LOL. But, that's my buddy and ya just have to know him. All the disrespect and cracks on his spelling, gramer and lack of computer skills have been nothing more than an attempt manipulate his anger, or "get his goat" as some would say. This is childish and is not in the best intrest of this thread.

There is nothing I would like more that to see a TRUE expert in the field of photography inspect these photographs and enhance them in a way that would be acceptable to the people on this site. I have missed a lot on this thread, after all there have been well over 800,000 posts. If there is some way or is some one knows of a person that could do this please e-mail me and I will talk to Creek and have this done. My e-mail is [email protected] and I invite any help with this. And yes my name is Cliff BTW.

Thanx again Snow for the welcome.
 
sorry Normal,, I'm not sure what the 800,000 thing was I must have seen but that is still too dog gone many for me to go back over.
 
Having watched Creekfreak tap dance as his story unraveled like a cheap sweater, I'm sorry I expended any effort at all preparing a license agreement. That's a dead issue now. I'm still willing to evaluate the photo but within the limitations of Fair Use under U.S. copyright law.

That's your protection, Creekfreak. The moment you created that photo, the copyright belonged to you. U.S. intellectual property law provides that statutory penalties may be imposed on violators. Take a look at the case Corbis won just last year...$30,000 per image plus $2500 for each act. Total damages awarded: $20,000,000...yeah, that's right, twenty million dollars. But you can only sue for statutory damages if you've registered your copyright with the United States Copyright Office.

Um, you have registered your photo, right? If you're really serious about protecting your rights, that's step numero uno. You don't absolutely gotta register it but if you don't and you successfully take an infringement case to court, you can only recover compensatory damages, rather than statutory. The cost of filing is $45 and you don't need a lawyer to make it binding. Free info.

So, you've got some decisions to make:

1. You can take the out I just gave you and claim that you won't provide the photo to anyone until you register it. Interested observers can make bets on whether you'll follow through or not.

2. You can provide the requested photos to me for evaluation under the constraints of Fair Use. If you want a license agreement, you provide it. There are examples all over the Net. If I find it acceptable, I'll sign it. If not, keep your photo. No skin off my nose.

3. Peddle it somewhere else.
 
All the disrespect and cracks on his spelling, gramer and lack of computer skills have been nothing more than an attempt manipulate his anger, or "get his goat" as some would say. This is childish and is not in the best intrest of this thread.

The comments on his spelling and syntax are not childish attempts to manipulate his anger. A careful reading of this thread shows that there are a number of places where Creek's writing becomes perfectly lucid. He is playing a game. Our pointing out that he is playing a game has nothing to do with "getting his goat." I, for one, will acknowledge out that that Creekfreak is an expert at this game. The post count is already over 1000. Creekfreak, you are a troll extraordinaire. Your kung-fu is the best. I bow to your wicked bitchin' troll skills, Creekfreak.
 
Last edited:
TF, all we need at this point is a picture of the spot showing the place where "bigfoot" was standing. Since there isn't anything of interest there anymore, there should be no copyright problems, right? All someone has to do is drive over there, take some good pics of the area, and post them so we can see them.

This should be no problem at all.

By now, "bigfoot" has had time to remove any offending stumps that might have been in his way, so we'll need good pictures of the spot so we can tell if "bigfoot" occasionally carries a Husqvarna.
 
Anyone who actually reads this thread will see that most of us have been unduly patient with creekfreak, and that creekfreak dug his own hole and has no one to blame but himself.
So true....so true.

More or less this thread has gone the typical way of the woo...outlandish claims & statements, followed by the promise of proof, followed by excuses, followed by “you are picking on me”, followed by more excuses, etc.

Creek only has himself to blame, as I suggest he has dealt with folks in a less then honest/credible way.

In spite of Thunderfoots plea, comments wrt Creeks claims & writing are fair game. There are times he appears quite lucid, there are others when it is pure gibberish (a language I do not speak/read well). While there could be medical reasons behind the lucid/gibberish changes (in which case comments on this would be off the table), it is typical woo’er behavior.

In the end, his conduct makes it clear he is simply playing a game. He avoids answering the most basic of questions, and the games he has played wrt his picture are simply silly…and continue to cast him in a scam/deceitful light.

Anyone with a basic understanding of Copyright law, NDAs, or even common sense knows his excuses for not letting folks like PetersCreek, myself, or others access to the originals simply does not add up. More to the point, as Creek found in dealing with DK (who did an excellent job at remaining neutral and sticking to just facts)….we are just the kind of folks he does NOT want to see the originals. Not because we are “experts”…but because we will take a critical, “skeptic” look at his photos and see what is really there – nothing.

And then there is Thunderfoot…the sudden appearance of an ally, acting as an interpreter (if you will) for Creek; gotta say something just seems out of whack.

Creek/TF – Read DK’s last post & take heed…it is sound advice from someone that is trying to help (why I don’t know, as you’ve done nothing but embarrass him). If you want to “save face”, gain any type of credibility, etc. he’s given you a clear game plan.

Sticking to the avoidance, double talk, rants, tangent talk about your boat, etc. does nothing to help your cause.
 
I tryed it myself on a freinds computer useing photoshop and I was even able to make the eyes show up without adding anything just by adjusting the blues .

Well, there we have it. CF knows how to use Photoshop. That was one of the questions we had concerning your abilities.

How about posting the picture so we can try this ourselves?
 
Well, there we have it. CF knows how to use Photoshop. That was one of the questions we had concerning your abilities.

How about posting the picture so we can try this ourselves?
Nice catch. Interesting other times he's denied that.

He's also made the claim that adjusting the color on the monitor has the same effect.

Be it via photoshop or adjusting the monitor color, adding distortion to get the user driven/expected/desired result you are after; sounds just like what our buddy George (ie. ET Corn God) might do.
 
O'tay let me get this right for you. There are 7677 threads and 308,213 posts as of this one.

Exactly what are you trying to get right for whom? THIS THREAD is the only one relevant to CF's claim. As of my post there is exactly one thread, and 1,094 posts.

What has every other thread and post on the forum have to do with CFs claim on this particular thread, which from your point of view is the only one that matters?

Norm
 
Not sure where TF is getting the info. There is indeed one CF claim thread with just over 1K posts and over 18K views.

Posters in this thread by number of posts:

Creekfreak 172
LTC8K6 133
Locknar 102
Normal Dude 52
kitakaze 44
mikeyx 32
madurobob 32
AudioFreak 26
Drewbot 24
Apology 24
Correa Neto 21
ThunderFoot 20
DrewD 19
William Parcher 17
PetersCreek 16
historian 15
chillzero 15
tsig 13
sthomson 12
darkwing 12
Michelle 12
slingblade 11
GT/CS 10
J. Arthur Hastur 9
fromdownunder 9
Snow 8
drapier 8
TjW 7
Belz... 7
Huntsman 6
TX50 6
Starthinker 6
Metullus 6
Aepervius 6
LAL 6
-Fran- 6
Zep 6
Babylon Sister 5
Crossbow 5
Z 5
grayman 5
SweatyYeti 5
firecoins 5
D'rok the Lacone 4
mangler 4
Diogenes 4
RayG 4
Spektator 4
Marquis de Carabas 4
Gord_in_Toronto 4
Biscuit 4
ChaoticLimbs 4
ben m 3
Ladewig 3
wahrheit 3
imjohn 3
Marcus 3
spc476 3
Cuddles 3
eir_de_scania 3
Kilgore Trout 3
athon 3
Jeff Corey 2
Drudgewire 2
In My Spare Time 2
Space_Ed 2
Alice Shortcake 2
Cainkane1 2
sinclairmcevoy 2
Czarcasm 2
Tirdun 2
Flo 2
CLD 2
Terry 2
Raja 2
B.S 2
Lynx2174 1
WDB 1
Diamond 1
Arkan_Wolfshade 1
Dazed 1
CptColumbo 1
Persiflage 1
The Atheist 1
Hindmost 1
Calcas 1
baron 1
WildCat 1
fagin 1
sackett 1
Cueshark 1
Skeptic Guy 1
Hokulele 1
Blue Mountain 1
Elizabeth I 1
lordofwaffles 1
PBTree 1
Zygar 1
Monza 1
NobbyNobbs 1
baron_army 1
autumn1971 1
Szin 1
Psi Baba 1
bruto 1
Dale 1
Lensman 1
Grimes 1
moopet 1
JoeEllison 1
vidiviciveni 1
Wowbagger 1
yitzhak 1
boojum 1
hmmm... 1
strathmeyer 1
tuc0 1
 
LTC you are correct. I am very new to this site and was looking at the thread and post listing when I first came in on the site. I do stand corrected.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom