bigfoot is real I have the proof

I did not see them becouse I was not looking for them . just a case of over looking them yes I did upload them to the computer I had at the time it blew and I lost everything . This is why I asked TF to do it for me . Then I bought this computer for 50 bucks and it will not support the program so one more reason to ask TF to do it for me . If you dont beleave me about what i am runing the mods of this site have acess to everybodys browser you will see I am runing windows 95 and I am dail up .

I have stated the eyes and face will show up without adding anything to the photo all that has to be done is adjust the colors in the photo . I have done this myself and it is not hard to do .

Since you don't currently have a computer on which you can do it yourself, you must have done it yourself on the other computer you had that blew up on you. So you must have already enhanced the photo before you went to TF because your computer blew up.

So the internet girl told you bigfoot was there, then you enhanced the photos yourself on your other computer, and then you knew what you had.

Then that computer blew up, and you bought another one for $50, which only had W95 on it. The Simmons software won't run on W95, so you could no longer look at the picture.

So then you took the SD card over to TF, who uploaded them and looked at them, and told you what you already knew.

The question is, did TF know you already knew bigfoot was in the photos?
 
Last edited:
My my things have taken a downward sprial since MABRCs analysis of Creeks' pic.

Creek - Take a look at DKs last post; read it, pay attention to it....you've reached the stage of embarassing yourself, which is never pretty.
 
Creekfreak actually said that the pictures had been analyzed by the "leading photo experts in the country" and authenticated.

Dear sir My name is Gary carlsten I am contacting you about a creature I have had 2 face to face incounters with . My first encounter was 1 ft away it was a young one standing 3 ft tall one of my freinds was with me at the time and we both where face to face with it . The secound ecounter was with a grown one over 8 ft tall less then 15 feet away he was diging through my trash . Recently I have taken some photos of the creatures during a forsest fire in my area , In the photos there is a state forestry helichopter hovering right in front of a grown one and a young one . These pitures have been analized by the leading photo experts in the country and have been proven to be legit . At this time I havent put the photos out for the pubilc to see except for members of a bigfoot research center I am a member of . I have been in contact with investers that are very intrested in buying the photos . But I wanted to contact you before I sold them and they where made public . I would be willing not to sale them but there would have to be a conditon and that is I would have to be given a job with the state to study these creatures with a buget to buy equipment to do the job . One way or another I will be studying this creature with or with out help from the state . I am willing to work with you if you are willing to work with me . The photos are very good of the creatures I am sure you would not want them out there it could start a lot of trouble for the pilots and yourself . My phone # is ...on the return of this email let me know when it is a good time for you to call . Thank you I will look forward to working with you on this matter I dont want to work aganst you but I will if you start denying this .
 
Last edited:
I'm still waiting to hear who the "leading experts in the country" (Note the plural) were that authenticated the photo, and what they had to say. I think we've repeated this question 30 times and have not had a direct response. Correct me if I am wrong...
 
Thank you I have been working on that I even got it right one time . Folks I have a hard time seeing some of the simplest words in my mind . This does not mean I am stupid . It shows a lack of class to make fun of a person that is trying to over his inabilities to spell correctly . You cant fault a person for trying that is not cool .
actually at your age that would make you illiterate
 
Darkwing had hopes at first. We mods were less charitable when we saw the first pic. I'm the one who noticed the outlines are nothing but tree branches; no enhancement needed there.

What proof do you have of this your statments about them being branches are unfounded lal .Look at the pictures of the area I sent to dark and you will not find any thing that backs your statement up . Dark is protecting your opinion and others on the forum I dont blame him for that its kind of hard keeping a group together on a bigfoot forum . Calling it a hoax is way out of line I would expect more from you .

I don't think much was added unless the chopper was 'shopped. I see no lake nor sign of a bucket. I've watched a helicopter fight a fire and it didn't get that low to dip water.

no lal the choper was not shoped in even darks assesment of the history has made that clear nothing was added to the original or the enhanched version . just becouse you have seen a fire being fought doesent mean you saw this one . the choper is over water the creek is on the other side of the tree line .

Only you know the truth on this, Creek, and it doesn't look like you're telling it.

again unfounded statements

So now it's a creek instead of a lake? Still no wash and no sign of a bucket.

DW pretty much stayed out of it while we gave our opinions. He was protecting no one, except possibly you. There's no problem keeping the group together; it's growing daily.

He regretted having to ask you to resign, but your actions since have shown that was the nicest thing he could do. You really let him down after all his kindness to you.

DW has clearly stated there's no sign of features in the unenhanced version. Don't take my word for it; ask locknar what he said.

The lines I refer to are branches; they seem to form a left shoulder, neck and head on the "figure" we can't see through. The "eyes" were added.

Try auctioning off the bungee cord. Maybe someone will buy that.

How's Stumpknocker these days?
 
Last edited:
I'm still waiting to hear who the "leading experts in the country" (Note the plural) were that authenticated the photo, and what they had to say. I think we've repeated this question 30 times and have not had a direct response. Correct me if I am wrong...
Oh the question has been asked a lot of times...and even though he is not refusing to answer anything, he never provides answers.

At this point, taking a strictly scientific stance...if he can not provide documentation then it didn't happen seems to be a reasonable stance.

That is to say, if he can not provide names...or at least their comments, then nobody (other then DK) looked at the high-res photo.
 
At this point I'm out of reasons to give Creekfreak the benefit of the doubt. I resign as apologist.

I'd like to thank Darkwing for his participation in this thread and say that I don't blame him or MABRC for this debacle. I think Darkwing handled the situation as fairly and objectively as possible. I know that MABRC members have expressed a concern that Creekfreak's behavior reflects negatively on all of them as a group, but I don't think it has. As a matter of fact, MABRC has shown more skepticism than I expected from a dedicated, pro-Bigfoot forum, so I personally see Bigfoot enthusiasts as a little less kooky than I'd imagined before I visited MABRC.
 
Don't be so hard on the Bigfoot believers. There's more proof of Bigfoot than there is for the holohoax.
do not post off topic, if you wish to discuss your historical revisionism please do so in the conspiracy theory sub-forum
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: brodski
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Huge post - I recommend skipping to the next!

Can I take over as apologist for Creekfreak?

Wowser, my head is spinning. I've just re-read the entire thread, taking notes, in an attempt to understand who Creekfreak showed the photo to, who spotted the bigfoots/bigfeet and brought them to Creekfreak's attention etc.

However, I got sidetracked and my notes turned into more of a potted history of Creekfreak's posts in this thread than a who-what-where-when. I've pasted these notes at the end of this post, just in case anyone may be interested in reading them. I don't claim these to be an accurate reflection of what Creekfreak has said here, they're just things he said which grabbed my attention at the time. Whatever, re-reading the thread and then reading my notes made me suspect I may be wrong in my initial impressions that Creekfreak was a scammer/hoaxer.

FWIW, I now suspect that he's playing fairly straight with us even if he does have a tendency to - ahem - exaggerate. My current opinion of what's happening here is that -

CAUTION - Speculation Ahead!

Creekfreak likes to hunt for Bigfoot. Maybe not the best use of his time, but not particularly harmful in itself. His friends and colleagues humour/encourage him because basically he's a nice guy.

He took a photograph of a helicopter, which he showed to at least two people - the internet friend "she" and ThunderFoot.

Someone he trusts has possibly Photoshop'd the pic to include vague bigfoot-like creatures, or has simply put the idea into Creekfreak's head that there are two bigfoots/bigfeet visible in the photo.

His friends and colleagues have encouraged this.

Creekfreak really believes he has a photo of bigfoot, that this photo is genuine and is worth a lot of money.

His friends and colleagues have encouraged this.

Creekfreak feels he is sitting on a potential goldmine - photos which he now thinks prove the existence of bigfoot. He wants to maximise any potential earnings from this photo.

His friends and colleagues have encouraged this.

Creekfreak is very wary of showing the original/enhanced photo to anyone (other than trusted people such as "she", Darkwing and ThunderFoot) as he is fearful of losing his rights to any potential earnings from this photo.

His friends and colleagues have encouraged this.

Darkwing has indicated that the photo is possibly not as valuable as Creekfreak hoped it was. Creekfreak has trouble accepting Darkwing's assessment of the photo.

His "friends" and colleagues have encouraged this.

[End-Speculation]

Of course, your mileage may vary.

Here are the random snippets of Creekfreak's posts in The Thread So Far, in chronological order -


... I disided to take some pictures of the chopers that where flying real close to us . After showing the pics to a freind of mine on the internet she pointed out there was 2 creatures ... After haveing them enhanced the face of the larger one was ...

... I have hair samples also . If you would care to pay for dna testing by an expert Ill be happy to send some of it to anyone you choose fit to do the job . ...

... I am not claming this is the best picture ever taken but its good enough to open some eyes to what is out there . ...

... It doesent matter if I show it or not you people will shoot it down no matter what . Its not worth the agrevation of fighting with you about it . ...

... I most likely will not be posting any more unless I see something positive to post about ...

... 4. From your vantage point, how far away was it to the helicopter?
about 50 yards ...

... Oh and yes they do understand english and can speak it also . And yes they are a lot smarter then a lot of people Ive met . ...

... This one understands english and he even said a few words of it from a distance that I understude perfectly . He said who you 3 times in different octives it wasent my imagination . He could have been mimicking me though becouse I did say who are you when I walked up on him . ...

... Now we come to the facts as far as I know no one has ever found a bear that has died naturaly in the wild . ...

... I do beleave there is one that likes to watch me work . He even pounds on my door early in the morning to let me know he is here to watch me . ...

... I have to protect my intrest everything I have is tied up in this . ...

... Like I said they mess up sometimes and get seen . The grown male I saw got bold and was diging trough my trash in the daytime . ...

... You know except for the insults you guys are not a bad bunch I have to respect your thinking . I would never expect anything less from anyone I came to with my claims . I must say I commend you for your critical thinking . ...

... A man can only take so much ridicule before he just says the hell with it I am about at that point . ...

... put it this way if I would have had a boat the day of the fire we would not be talking about this I would have been able to get right in there face . ...

... I am in the field of bigfoot research not some troll out of the gutter of the internet . I am as real as it gets people if you think you can better come on down to the swamp and get ya some . ...

... my name is Gary carlsten AKA Creekfreak this photo belongs to me . ...

... You people have a lot of nerve asking to see the original . Well there you have it this photo is real I give my word that it is . I am willing to show it to the worlds best photo experts . Find them and I will show it to them ...

... lock I have answered every question that has been asked by the mabrc . I have not withheld anything they just have not received all my imformation and that is an original unenhanced copy . ...

... I told Dark it was a man that did the enhanceing he made the mistake of saying it was a women not me get your facts straight . I women brought it to my attention but she had nothing to do with enhanceing it . ...

... yes there is a record it was a big fire with alot of fire fighters and many witnesses . I even know who started it . ...

... I am geting tired of defending myself I really dont owe you people any explanation for anything . The photo is real get the experts on it . ...

... what i have presented to you is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God with my hand on a bible . ...

... if your not a prof what do you do ? where is your lab and what are you studying ? ...

... One last thing noone has realized is . The helicopter could have been air lifting them out with his bucket . ...

... and the fact it was naked and covered with hair he was not a pretty sight folks . I know its insencitive but he had **** hanging off his ass and matted in his hair .I guess the reason I did not smell him is becouse he was down wind from me . ...

... And why hasent the palm dates that I have in my frezzer that could have dna on them that I think a bigfoot has sucked the juice out of have not been asked for ? ...

... Come on down to my swamp and ill train you to be the main man in bigfoot rerseach ! I am geting old and I need to pass on what I know or it will be lost . ...

... It must keep them up all night thinking of ways to trip me up but they cant . When you tell the truth you dont have anything to worry about . ...

... I say this is a picture of some bigfoots or bigfeets I came here to debate it but no one has proven it is not . If it is not bigfeets then what are they ? ...

... I say I have the proof prove that I dont its pretty simple . ...

... why dont you get the experts to take a look at it ? ...

... And I also consider the MAN that did the color enhancing to be an expert also . If you would like to bring in your own experts you are welcomed to but you havent so ...

... I told you Dark is one of my experts the other will remain nameless at this time . ... then I will allow them to look at it untell then your just going to have to take Darks word for what he finds . ...

... I havent been given a better one so far from any of you I am still waiting where are your experts . Mine is Dark of the mabrc who are yours ? ...

... Sorry Dark but your assesment is worng I can see it plain as day even with this moniter you are mistaken my good man . All you have to do is adjust the blues in the photo and the eyes will show up again sorry but you are worng on this one . ...

... The photos I sent dark are of the same spot and it is clear that there are no bigfoots in it the next day . He has made a mistake on this and I will prove it if I have to go back and take more . ...

... This is not over yet guys I am going the distance with this everything will be proven in time . ...

... All that has been proven here is that Dark and I disagree on his assessment . ...

... I said it was good not the best it needed to be enhanced to show what is there . no hoax just makeing it better I dont see anything worng with that ...

... It is very clear Dark did not intend to give this a positive reveiw from the start ...

... peter wheres is that agreement ? you may get to see it after all I need to know your real name and any other imformation you can provide me . Web sights that have your work ,back ground, military experience ect

... And at this point I will go with out a lawyer but I need to know who this man is with out a dout . ...

... I dont disagree with all he [darkwing] has said just some of it . And what Ive said I disagree with has not been proven not to be true . ...

... I have not refused any one anything you are twisting my words this is very common with people like you . ...

... the creatures where pointed out to me by some one I sent them to before I knew they where there . I was telling her about the intresting few days I had ...

... Dark let me talk to TF about this first I value his judgement as well as yours ...


ETA - and a belated "Welcome to the forum" to Creekfreak's friend and colleague, ThunderFoot.

ETA2 - What Apology says -

I'd like to thank Darkwing for his participation in this thread and say that I don't blame him or MABRC for this debacle. I think Darkwing handled the situation as fairly and objectively as possible. I know that MABRC members have expressed a concern that Creekfreak's behavior reflects negatively on all of them as a group, but I don't think it has. As a matter of fact, MABRC has shown more skepticism than I expected from a dedicated, pro-Bigfoot forum, so I personally see Bigfoot enthusiasts as a little less kooky than I'd imagined before I visited MABRC.
 
Can I take over as apologist for Creekfreak?

I will gladly name you my successor as you seem to have the basic spirit of the thing. I always felt that Creek was somewhat misguided and had been misled by people that he trusted deeply, possibly for their own amusement. He's also not exactly Shakespeare, so I think some of the confusion stems from his inability to express himself clearly rather than from outright deceit. The fact that we found so many things to quibble about from his posts didn't necessarily imply that he was deliberately lying.

However, it's gotten to the point where Creek needs to either give us the photos for analysis or abandon his claim.

Apologism is a thankless job, but it's too late, you've already accepted. Haha. Sucker.
 
Snow, you didn't include all the junk on other forums, though. The wacky stories of bigfoot visiting him, the claims of inventing the weed eater and bungee jumping, the photos of the Ivory Billed Woodpecker, etc.

CF didn't get started here. His fantasy motor has been going for a long time.

:deadhorse

:s2: Somebody wake me when it's over.
 
Check us out on Jacob's photos, too, speaking of being skeptical.
 
Last edited:
That reminds me, LTC, just where did I say I thought the Wallace feet were a match for anything? I've never thought that. (Yes, I know I'm off-topic.)
 
That reminds me, LTC, just where did I say I thought the Wallace feet were a match for anything? I've never thought that.

Huh?

Somebody must have thought they were a match for something because the idea was that Wallace had copied a track, rather than Wallace making the track. This was the explanation for the match.
 
I would like to point out one more thing. Creek has claimed a few times that he did not notice the bigfoot in the pictures. However, he also said several times that he thought he saw a stump.

all I saw was a black figure above the marsh grass I thought at the time it was just a stump

I kept seeing something black but in my mind it was a stump .

So I believe he did notice the bigfoot, he just called it a stump until it was enhanced. :D
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom