• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Bigfoot follies

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet more follies: http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/

Scroll down to the Ds.

I suggest we write an article and submit it to DeNovo under assumed names with fake credentials, full of sciencey sounding rationalizations for entertainment purposes only.

How about " Inference of Genetic Mutations Required in the Tapida Lucidum to Enhance Broad Spectrum Visual Fields"?
 
Last edited:
Oh I doubt he leaves for good, the first whiff of some new money and back on the bandwagon he goes.
 
I heard she hired calwaterbear as a proofreader... :D :duck:

Actually Cal water bear is presently engaged in chasing the story that Melba has now been retained to run DNA for a small group of people who believe that the "elongated heads" are highbrids with - as far as i can tell aliens!
Can't say for sure yet, still developing!

See what happens when you step outside the echo chamber? you actually hear new information, and have time to check it out.

Proof reading and spell checking - thats your specialty right ? As I told you privately, thats below my pay grade. Thats why I have copyboys to do that job!
cal watter Bare
 
I suggest we write an article and submit it to DeNovo under assumed names with fake credentials, full of sciencey sounding rationalizations for entertainment purposes only.

How about " Inference of Genetic Mutations Required in the Tapida Lucidum to Enhance Broad Spectrum Visual Fields"?

great idea, whos going to front the 1500 buck submission fee? which in itself is unique to an "open source" Journal.

Kal Whater Bare
 
great idea, whos going to front the 1500 buck submission fee? which in itself is unique to an "open source" Journal.

Kal Whater Bare

You mean Melba's charging 1500 for submissions to her non-existant journal for non existant papers of no substance? I bet she'll take monopoly money.
 
You mean Melba's charging 1500 for submissions to her non-existant journal for non existant papers of no substance? I bet she'll take monopoly money.

She can charge the marks $1500 dollars for submitting her papers to herself, I kinda admire it.
 
The picture in the gallery of the braided horse tail is outstanding. In my opinion, the hair looks matted to me. Perhaps the big fellas don't possess similar manual dexterity to humans, so the brading attempt ended up looking like matted hair. Also the stick structures are outstanding. There are a couple on the hill behind my house that must have been constructed by Bigfeet. Time to set up camera traps, NOT.

Ketchum is claiming that Bigfoot is braiding the hair on her horse? That isn't as original as it sounds. There was a book written years ago by a new age woo woman who claimed that Bigfoot braids the hair on her horse. I think we discussed it here.

Two different women in different decades. Both claim that Bigfoot braids the hair of horses.
 
Well, I'm actually worried about Sykes going down the rabbit hole.

I'm not mocking anything at all. I'm beginning to worry about Sykes and his apparently growing association with woo-meisters.

If he goes down the rabbit hole I won't regret putting him in a pigeonhole.

We'd need to hear him actually talk about his belief. This is because we learned a lesson from Jane Goodall. Don't believe what the Bigfooters say about you. They only tell you that she is a believer and she said so. They won't tell you exactly what she said. Which is...

I'm certain that they exist. Maybe they don't exist, but I want them to.

For the most part, it is so firmly established that Bigfoot is a myth, that it doesn't matter what the hell Sykes thinks. We still don't have a body and Sykes is going to say that they exist? Please not again.
 
When you read exactly what Goodall said about Bigfoot you instantly realize that she is just woo kook on Bigfoot. That she is a chimp researcher is meaningless for this specific topic.

The Footers brag about her believing because she is a famous smart person who works with wild apes. But by bringing attention to her, they've only shown that she has a woo streak running through her.

I read Goodall throughout my youth. But I never knew she was a gobsmackingly gullible woman until she opened her mouth about Bigfoot.
 
If he goes down the rabbit hole I won't regret putting him in a pigeonhole.

We'd need to hear him actually talk about his belief. This is because we learned a lesson from Jane Goodall. Don't believe what the Bigfooters say about you. They only tell you that she is a believer and she said so. They won't tell you exactly what she said. Which is...

I'm certain that they exist. Maybe they don't exist, but I want them to.

For the most part, it is so firmly established that Bigfoot is a myth, that it doesn't matter what the hell Sykes thinks. We still don't have a body and Sykes is going to say that they exist? Please not again.

It would be a little scary if the cult sucks another scientist in.

Will we find out later that Sykes has been a footer all along?

But as I hinted at earlier, footers need a truly objective scientist to release results favorable to them to get anywhere. (Which isn't going to happen, but Sykes was supposedly their next chance)

If Sykes is another believer, then they have lost another round.
 
If you go to this Cryptomundo link, you will find this snippit. http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bigfoot-braids/

We know of the several ID's of Robin Lynn, could this be another?


First there is the theory promoted by Robin Bellamy and Lisa A. Shiel that some horse hair braids are Bigfoot playing with the ponies. Perhaps, perhaps not, but Shiel’s book, Backyard Bigfoot deals with her thoughts, and is there for all to digest. Lisa knows I disagree with her mixing of UFOs and the hairy ones, so exploring that avenue any further is up to you. Been there, done that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom