Merged Bigfoot follies

Status
Not open for further replies.
BronzeDog said:
Skimmed some of the websites and I'm underwhelmed by all the photos. Even with stuff circled, I don't see anything that can't be explained by pareidolia. Maybe you should get some higher resolution pictures, so the close-ups will be something other than indistinct blobs.
Click to expand...

1) fyi, bigfoot does not pose for you.

2) what you see is damn lucky . You can't just go out and
get high defi photos of A SHAPESHIFTER...(as someone noted on this forum....)

and the camera was good qual 35mm. f1.8 lens, 50 mm.
Range 235 feet. On a tripod yet. ASA 200.

It shifts at more than 1/10.000 sec so you cannot get
freeze frame. (exception - Patterson Film).

What did you think these are? A panda ? A chimp? A cow?

3) Pareidolia is a BS term and it is not valid.

Ditto Similaricum (spell).

eb
 
erikbeckjord said:
3) Pareidolia is a BS term and it is not valid.
Click to expand...
So, are you saying that the cloud I once saw that looked exactly like Evangelion 02 actually was a message from Studio Gainax, the makers of Neon Genesis Evangelion?

GX15_80w.gif
 
BronzeDog said:
So, are you saying that the cloud I once saw that looked exactly like Evangelion 02 actually was a message from Studio Gainax, the makers of Neon Genesis Evangelion?

GX15_80w.gif
Click to expand...

No. However it may have been (I was not there)
a temporary image made of water vapour, that changed ten sec later.

I have somewhere on my sites a rainbow taken in Maui

that has two demon-type heads RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE,

and I once got shots of a Christ in the Clouds image

on the day the Gulf War II started.

Ten min later they changed to reg clouds. (Of course)
:D
 
erikbeckjord said:
No. However it may have been (I was not there)
a temporary image made of water vapour, that changed ten sec later.

I have somewhere on my sites a rainbow taken in Maui

that has two demon-type heads RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE,

and I once got shots of a Christ in the Clouds image

on the day the Gulf War II started.

Ten min later they changed to reg clouds. (Of course)
:D
Click to expand...
So, you saw stuff in clouds. That's pareidolia. If I had my camera I could have photographed it and preserved its "Eva 02ness" Is it too much of a stretch that shadows, leaves, depressions in the ground, etcetera, could look like fuzzy apes and footprints?
 
BronzeDog said:
So, you saw stuff in clouds. That's pareidolia. If I had my camera I could have photographed it and preserved its "Eva 02ness" Is it too much of a stretch that shadows, leaves, depressions in the ground, etcetera, could look like fuzzy apes and footprints?
Click to expand...

No.

Not pareidolia.

That term implies there is no real image of a real thing.

I say it is there., albeit briefly, put there by spiritual entities, FOR YOU TO SEE.

Happened on my grandma's death, and many times as omens to not go to certain places I was headed for.

Each time, it was right and I was right to have turned back.

Clouds, like water and like rocks, or cliffs,

are an easel for spirits to work with.

Now, are you saying that
Bigfoot rracks I followed for three miles in snow are fake images? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Youse guys be nutz.
 
Those particular "footprints" might be something else mundane. But pareidolia seems to be your thing, judging from the photos on your website.
 
BronzeDog said:
Is Krantz correct?
Click to expand...


He was an anthropologist. He had as good a chance of being right as anybody.
Giganto is known from a couple of jaws and a thousand teeth. A foramen magnum would be useful, or better yet, a femur. Ape fossils are frustratingly rare.
 
Cleon said:
Chhhh-prrrrr....Welcome to the dark side....Chhhhh-prrrrrr

This thread is going to get really, really funny when LAL gets back.
Click to expand...

It is?
So Voldemort is here, in the flesh........er, post.
You guys wanted a "Bigfoot woo"? You got him.
 
erikbeckjord said:
I spotted the spoor of a Bigfoot back in 1970, when I was a student at Miskatonic University, in Arkham, Mass. On a brisk December morn, oh yes, I remember it well. Professor Cristopher Robin pointed out that a suspicious tract had appeared across the virgin field of snow in front of of us. He claimed it to be words from the original Wholey Babble, but I demurred. "It is a spoor of the Sasquatch or Big Foot," I demurred, redundently.
"Besides, it's track, not tract."
"But it's a mere 19 centimeters long!", he apostrophised!
"Must be a baby Bigfoot."

This dedicated to Wayne Tytell, who first told this joke.
Click to expand...
 
erikbeckjord said:
1) fyi, bigfoot does not pose for you.

2) what you see is damn lucky . You can't just go out and
get high defi photos of A SHAPESHIFTER...(as someone noted on this forum....)

and the camera was good qual 35mm. f1.8 lens, 50 mm.
Range 235 feet. On a tripod yet. ASA 200.

It shifts at more than 1/10.000 sec so you cannot get
freeze frame. (exception - Patterson Film).

What did you think these are? A panda ? A chimp? A cow?

3) Pareidolia is a BS term and it is not valid.

Ditto Similaricum (spell).

eb
Click to expand...


I have one thing to say: Most of your links don't work.
And one thing to ask: What are you on?
 
LAL said:
He was an anthropologist. He had as good a chance of being right as anybody.
Giganto is known from a couple of jaws and a thousand teeth. A foramen magnum would be useful, or better yet, a femur. Ape fossils are frustratingly rare.
Click to expand...

I knew Krantz, all too well. You don't.

He was a dishonest scientist who ignored data that he did not "like".

Giganto was never BF since the jaws DO NOT MATCH.

BF has slender jaw ad seen in PG Film, frames 368.369.370.372.372

Anthropologists are not God and Krantz was the devil.

EB
 
BronzeDog said:
Those particular "footprints" might be something else mundane. But pareidolia seems to be your thing, judging from the photos on your website.
Click to expand...

You judge too quickly, young Jedi.

Take five hrs and read the entire site.

Footprints are passe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom