Diogenes said:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LAL
I don't see why you think that's funny. One of the purposes of the expedition was to test the thermal equipment to see if it would be of use. It took the batteries down too fast and wasn't as useful as they had hoped. How long does a heat imprint last? There was frost heave in the mud hole on day eight.
I know you are a very intelligent person, but you have blinders on.
Same to you, fella.
A creature ( something ) is walking along. It manages to leave only three thermal prints.
What switched the prints on and off? Does our creature fly?
Maybe it can match it's thermal signature to the surrounding terrain at will..
Firstly, they never said the heat prints were left by a Sasquatch. They said it could have been a bear. It could not have been a hooved animal. How long would a heat print last, say, on cold, wet leaves? They found three on rock, which doesn't mean the animal had three legs. It means three heat prints were found on rock. There may have been more that couldn't be detected. That's pretty obvious, isn't it?
Why not ?
The same creature seems to have the ability to refrain from leaving it's DNA anywhere..
And how much testing has there been altogether? 25 hair samples have been found to be "unknown animal" or "unknown primate". Tissue or blood is needed and no one's been able to get that, get it to a lab and a report back yet.
So, how many people are out looking for Sasquatch DNA? Or bones? How would one spot it if camping in a "hot spot" in between downpours? How much would it cost to test every leaf and twig and strand of club moss that might have a shed skin cell on it?
Saying they don't exist because conclusive testable DNA hasn't been found yet is like saying life can't exist anywhere else in the universe because we haven't found it yet.
Remember, most encounters last about twenty seconds. If you suddenly encountered a gigantic creature that isn't supposed to exist, would you have the presense of mind to try to get a blood sample?
Amateurs bring in what they find. The semi-professional Skookum team brought in good evidence. If the hair wasn't contaminated (and contamination can happen on the vials at the manufacturer), it indicated a species very close to our own, closer than Chimpanzees, evidently.
It wasn't hair from elk, coyote, bear, racoon, wood rat, humans.......It was found in the impression. So ruling out all other possibilities, what's left?
Anything is possible, untill proved impossible.
Then it's possible they exist, isn't it?
For some reason, the quote feature isn't letting me quote much. Anyone else having a problem?
There may be hidden characters that truncate the quote.. Just post your text and include your own ' quote ' delimiters ..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried copying and pasting the whole thing and it seems to have left out all the bold type.
Weird.
__________________