Huntster. He´s a classic troll, if you ask me. Yes, I know nobody asked, but I’ll say it anyway. He was brought here ages ago by LAL when she asked BFF folks to join JREF to help her defending bigfoot and bigfootery. Fire support was his perceived role, I guess. He entered and left my ignore list a couple of times.
He admitted being a troll– I once questioned him if he could present something other than offenses; anything of any use to contribute to the discussions or counter my arguments. He said no. He said since he could not counter my arguments, all that he could do was to be offensive, attempting to somehow change the situation. So, he tries hard to be a cyber bully, playing the though guy role. He’s not the single and only footer to act like this.
I lost my temper with him one too many times before learning how to deal with the situation; I probably would have already received a fair share of warnings and suspensions if our dialogues were happening now. I actually have, however, to thank him by showing me how to handle people like him. Seeing his obvious frustration and the many gaskets he blew once I stopped feeling annoyed and offended by his offensive behavior was, I must admit, rather fun.
He couldn’t admit being wrong, at least online and at JREF. He once accused me of stalking him at other subforums and also of being a Kitakaze sockpuppet. I said something like “OK big boy, show your cards. Tell the mods/admins. Both things are against the rules. They will investigate it and if you are right, I and Kitakaze will be banned. You’ll at last will be proven right in something and shut us up for good.” His answer was pathetic. He said “In his mind that’s all we are and he needed nothing else but this”. Typical footer behavior. Claims to be quite close to proving his point, bigfoot is right there behind the next tree, at last its time to shut up all the skeptics, at last the day of reckoning will dawn… And then… Whoops, sorry, gotta stop right now and go home.
But the worst aspects of his personality surfaces when discussion religion. His defenses of the genocides described in the Bible are disgusting. How a person can defend slaughtering children “because they are the sons of the enemies” while living in the XXI century under a democracy and enjoying all the privileges of a modern society is beyond my understanding. Disgusting, again.
The odds are he’s reading what we are writing about him and will blow some gaskets and enter in to some sort of tantrum. Too bad for him. Well, maybe he’ll become happy because we are paying attention to him. Bet not few footers crave for attention.
That's a really good question actually. Both have that same attitude huh (i.e. indefatigable ignorance of their shortcomings?). They both believe that if they think it, then it's instantly and irrevocably legitimate because they "thinked it". How much more legitimacy do you need? Actually, they're both on an interstate ego trip in a dilapidated '62 VW bus that's low on oil and leaking gas.
