• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bigfoot Follies: part trois

Considering, yes, and in seriousness, though the likelihood is remote, I admit.

I will progress no further in considering it, though, without foreknowledge of all the requirements on my part, and the NDA is one of them.

Do you have access to it?

I went back through some old emails and found a copy. I would be happy to email it to you if your intentions become something more than remote. Please let me know.
 
Does it contain any language that requires the signee to remain silent even if they suspect foul play or fraud?
 
So what the hell are you guys even doing on their land if you're still unable to deliver literally any proof of the existence of giant ape-men? lol. :rolleyes:

"Look, there's a Squatch, in plain sight, in broad daylight! Quick, get the camera! Ah, shucks, he just made off into those trees, what're the chances of that?"

Any day now, eh?

Fingers crossed!

Warning: NSFW language. Might just be closing in on winning our bet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft7nBx9oRl4
 
Does it contain any language that requires the signee to remain silent even if they suspect foul play or fraud?

No, it doesn't and I don't think it can. Not a lawyer but I don't think you can sign something that requires anyone to not report illegal activity.
 
Oh dear.
Have you looked at his other vids?
That "mother and cub" one is hilarious.

And the "bigfoot hand" one as well.

Yep...any day now...any day.
 
Yeah... The foot video.

Wow, this is not the video you're looking for.
 
NL would you be willing to disclose the name of the public land the Bigfoots are located.
Having been down this road before with Chris, I'd love to know if it's a national/state park that I have not visited and may have other interest of mine, if I made the trip.
 
The guy, Peter Caine works in Fiberglass and animatronic artwork sculptures.

http://www.derekeller.com/exhibitions/peter-caine/press-release

He is also known as a comedian.

http://www.artweek.com/events/unite...ew-york/peter-caine-let’s-print-****-walmart#

http://www.lorenmunk.com/writing/peter_cain.html
As a child, Peter Caine dreamed of three career paths. One was to be a veterinarian, which he’s pursued through a love of, and caring for, animals. Second was to be a stand-up comedian. He’d stay up late and tape comic routines from the “Johnny Carson Show,” then work up his own acts. Third, after visiting a Van Gogh exhibition, the child Caine knew he wanted to be an artist. (Poor Vincent. If he could see what his work inspired, he might well chop off his other ear.) A fourth career the artist might have picked is cinematographer. Each of his ambitious tableaux is designed with an eye for the dramatic. Characters are cast, the staging is blocked, actions programmed, costumes chosen, props selected, lighting devised, dialogue written and recorded. Smoke and bubble machines, electric balls, antique fans, and mechanical gizmos of all kinds lend the shebang the sensation of a grungy mad professor at work on some diabolical passion play.

Making art is a process, it's like Andy Kaufman, it's so calculated, he wants the viewer to think they are looking at a trainwreck.

All things he says in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOeqnqw56yA

Classic, the bigfooters hitching their hopes to this guy.
 
I went back through some old emails and found a copy. I would be happy to email it to you if your intentions become something more than remote. Please let me know.
Then we are at an impasse, and one I suspect you are intentionally manufacturing. The content of the NDA is a key component of my determination of whether to take this seriously. I am not yanking your chain; I am attempting to determine whether my chain will be yanked.

I have signed many NDAs in my life in both the civilian and government worlds. With rare exception, the NDAs have never been treated as sensitive documents themselves, and I can conceive of no legitimate reason why the NDA for this trip would be one of the exceptions.

Therefore I will ask directly: What is your reasoning for not sharing the NDA now?
 
You can't be serious.

EDIT:ok, just watched the mother and cub video. Now I know you are just fooling.

I hadn't seen the full bigfoot...it's extraordinarily bad. But it looks really bad only because we have a good clear view of it.

It would still fool the footers if taken into the woods and filmed poorly.
 
You can't be serious.

EDIT:ok, just watched the mother and cub video. Now I know you are just fooling.

Between his rock on a stump photo, his link to the BLAARGin' Town of Remer, and this fake-foot video, it's clear NL is having some fun with the scofftics. Good for him. It takes the sting out of the no bigfoot reality.
 
Then we are at an impasse, and one I suspect you are intentionally manufacturing. The content of the NDA is a key component of my determination of whether to take this seriously. I am not yanking your chain; I am attempting to determine whether my chain will be yanked.

I have signed many NDAs in my life in both the civilian and government worlds. With rare exception, the NDAs have never been treated as sensitive documents themselves, and I can conceive of no legitimate reason why the NDA for this trip would be one of the exceptions.

Therefore I will ask directly: What is your reasoning for not sharing the NDA now?

Because I'm not one of the three owners of the SRA group and it's not mine to send. How about this? As I said earlier, I do have a conference call with all three next Tuesday so I will ask them if they have any objection to me forwarding it to you. If not, I will be happy to send it your way.
 
Please tell us all that you realize those videos can't possibly win the bet.

Yes, the only way I can win the bet is for the scientific world to accept the existence of Sasquatch and not because of some knucklehead on YouTube. The clock is ticking and runs out at midnight on December 31st this year.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom