Jodie
Philosopher
- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 6,231
Who is SY?
Southern Yahoo
Who is SY?
I think they are referring to Southern Yahoo from the BFF boards.
Dr. Ketchum and her team of scientists and laboratories have been able to sequence three complete genomes, getting identical results independently verified by different labs. This is not a casual everyday finding, this will cause the scientific community to stand up and take notice. Many people have claimed to know what our results were, nearly everyone was wrong, even some high profile media people that have just recently made comments, all were wrong.
Dr. Ketchum originally found the combination to unlock bigfoot DNA and utilized top scientists in various fields to validate her results. The results were independently verified with the group silently sitting on these findings for months, as the results were validated a third and fourth time. Remember, this isn’t one total genome sequence; it’s three with dozens and dozens of other findings validating the results.
I'm totally going to get skewed for asking this, but what if? What if the DNA thing comes out as "whatever"? Will it change anyones mind on the JREF?
BTW - I feel it would not really matter, need a type specimen, as I have stated for years.
she's publishing it in a russian journal dude..... do you think that' because it's of too high a quality for American Journals?
or do you think that's because her paper got kicked back for being garbage?
Don't get me wrong, if a legit scientist like Sykes coms out and says "there might be something to this" then you have my attention, but anyone who takes this broad and her Bigfoot shell game seriously is losing more than a few screws.
seriously, somwhere PT Barnum is blushing
she's publishing it in a russian journal dude..... do you think that' because it's of too high a quality for American Journals?
or do you think that's because her paper got kicked back for being garbage?
Don't get me wrong, if a legit scientist like Sykes coms out and says "there might be something to this" then you have my attention, but anyone who takes this broad and her Bigfoot shell game seriously is losing more than a few screws.
seriously, somwhere PT Barnum is blushing
Sounds like we may be back to my original Hoopa theory.
she's publishing it in a russian journal dude..... do you think that' because it's of too high a quality for American Journals?
or do you think that's because her paper got kicked back for being garbage?
Don't get me wrong, if a legit scientist like Sykes coms out and says "there might be something to this" then you have my attention, but anyone who takes this broad and her Bigfoot shell game seriously is losing more than a few screws.
seriously, somwhere PT Barnum is blushing
...scientific magazines refuse to publish her manuscript which deserves to be published.
I think Burtsev* is blowing smoke, conflating and inflating some statements from various sources including Paulides. And it may have worked, because apparently Ketchum, from wherever she is, has responded. But I do agree that no quality American peer reviewed scientific journal will publish the idea that human DNA is proof of bigfoot. There are many offshore journals that will publish almost anything, and I do think that she, like Roger Patterson, is both determined and desperate. Having said that, there is no evidence that a Russian journal is involved.
* not a scientist; more like a Russian John Green, and his "International Center of Hominology" may be nothing more than he and his fellow Russian bleevers sitting around a cheesy kitchen table, putting things on the internet. I mean, just like the dozens of cheesy bigfoot "organizations" on this side of the ocean.
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=491&pictureid=6968[/qimg]
Dmitri Bayanov (also not a scientist) "Science Director" of the "InternationalKitchen TableCenter of Hominology."